Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

A10 Networks Thunder CGN vs BIG-IP Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

A10 Networks Thunder CGN
Ranking in Carrier Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT)
2nd
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
BIG-IP Carrier-Grade Networ...
Ranking in Carrier Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT)
4th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Carrier Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT) category, the mindshare of A10 Networks Thunder CGN is 23.1%, down from 35.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of BIG-IP Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT) is 15.6%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Carrier Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1336776 - PeerSpot reviewer
Enabled us to collapse hardware- and software-based solutions into one
The scalability is good for us. The 5440 HW is more than capable of handling our current traffic patterns allowing us to grow and not have to do in-place upgrades in the immediate to near term. It's meeting a small portion of our overall network needs, but provides the solution that we sought out. From a hardware standpoint, it makes up a small fraction of our overall deployment, but the usage behind it is very different from what we utilize our production data center hardware for. As I mentioned, it is just providing outbound NAT-ing for us. As we grow our data center space we would expand its usage and footprint. We typically see changes in traffic due to our organic growth and ramp-up of internal services. We plan to implement the following technologies/strategies in the next three years: keeping up with PFS/ECC encryption standards as they evolve. We may or may not move more applications to public cloud. Also, it's possible we could implement cloud repatriation of applications from public cloud to private data centers.
Use BIG-IP Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT)?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Carrier Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT) solutions are best for your needs.
865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Leucom Group
Information Not Available