4me vs HaloITSM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
4me Logo
406 views|229 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Halo Service Solutions Logo
516 views|314 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between 4me and HaloITSM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed 4me vs. HaloITSM Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anneri Van Der Merwe
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It offers a comprehensive set of features without requiring additional payments for each feature.""I like their request management as well as their project management.""The multi-tenancy architecture, both in terms of functionality and reporting, is the best feature. It is a really well-thought, designed, and developed part of this product."

More 4me Pros →

"The solution's initial setup process was quite straightforward... I rate the technical support a nine and a half out of ten.""The product’s UI is very good.""The most valuable aspect is that is is codeless."

More HaloITSM Pros →

Cons
"We would like to be able to customize and brand the solution, or at least the majority of its features and dashboards, particularly those that will be used by a large number of people.""We're still biased towards our previous, more mature product. 4me still needs to reach that level of maturity.""One area where I believe there's room for improvement in the 4me system is the absence of an asset discovery tool."

More 4me Cons →

"The solution's integration part needs to improve...In the future release of the solution, I expect to see certain changes in the programming of the solution. A customer of the solution should be able to customize it as per their need.""There are no improvements needed. There is very little that HALO has not already built that is not on its roadmap.""The product does not have its own orchestration engine."

More HaloITSM Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is the most affordable because it is priced per month per user."
  • "This pricing falls on the lower end of the spectrum, making it a cost-effective option."
  • "The licensing costs on the website are about $60 for pay-as-you-go. And then it decreases based on volume discounts or something."
  • More 4me Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's $69 per user per month. Only administrators need a license, and there is no limit to the number of endpoints."
  • "The solution's pricing model is good. Also, they still follow the old concurrent licensing method."
  • "The product’s pricing is competitive and less complicated."
  • More HaloITSM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions are best for your needs.
    770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The multi-tenancy architecture, both in terms of functionality and reporting, is the best feature. It is a really well-thought, designed, and developed part of this product.
    Top Answer:It's not a very cheap product, but not a very expensive one either. The competitors are certainly more expensive. Considering the bundled functionality in your license, it outperforms many competitors… more »
    Top Answer:We're still biased towards our previous, more mature product. 4me still needs to reach that level of maturity. However, for most users, the product will do what they need. It's only when you have… more »
    Top Answer:The product’s UI is very good.
    Top Answer:The product’s pricing is competitive and less complicated. There is only one license cost, which includes all the components. There's no additional cost component for separate modules. It makes it… more »
    Top Answer:The product does not have its own orchestration engine. If someone is looking for orchestration, they must look for an external tool.
    Ranking
    Views
    406
    Comparisons
    229
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    629
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    516
    Comparisons
    314
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    550
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    ServiceNow logo
    Compared 60% of the time.
    ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus logo
    Compared 20% of the time.
    Zendesk logo
    Compared 19% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    4me is the first enterprise service management application specifically built to support the Service Integration and Management (SIAM) approach. It allows the internal and external service providers of an enterprise to collaborate while 4me keeps track of the service levels. 4me also offers, by far, the fastest global response times and the most user-friendly interface.

    HaloITSM is an IT service management solution that helps businesses streamline the entire incident lifecycle, from ticket creation to issue resolution. It enables professionals to update the status of incidents and view details including ticket ID, priority level, issue summary, and date created.

    HaloITSM allows organizations to link new incidents with existing requests and share potential solutions with team members or end-users through the knowledge base. Managers can specify default values such as categories, priority, service-level agreements, or mailboxes before creating requests. Customer service agents can view upcoming tasks on a calendar and streamline approval processes by requesting validation on ticket creation or modifications.

    HaloITSM facilitates integration with various third-party applications such as Slack, Microsoft Office 365, Okta, Splunk, Facebook, Twitter, and more. Other features of HaloITSM include reporting, compliance management, status tracking, a self-service portal, collaboration, and auditing. It also helps businesses generate maintenance requests, store asset details, and set validation rules across configuration fields using IP addresses or numeric passwords.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Innocent Drinks, SKY TV, Sports Direct, Suzuki, Siemens, NHS, Cardiff City Council, Atos, AO.com, Ambitious about Autism, SEPA, York University etc.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company32%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Construction Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government7%
    Real Estate/Law Firm7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise45%
    Buyer's Guide
    4me vs. HaloITSM
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about 4me vs. HaloITSM and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    4me is ranked 20th in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 3 reviews while HaloITSM is ranked 14th in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 3 reviews. 4me is rated 8.0, while HaloITSM is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of 4me writes "Reasonably priced, easy integration, and workflow automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HaloITSM writes "An affordable and scalable solution that provides an excellent UI and many out-of-the-box integration capabilities". 4me is most compared with ServiceNow, ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus and Zendesk, whereas HaloITSM is most compared with JIRA Service Management, ServiceNow and Freshservice. See our 4me vs. HaloITSM report.

    See our list of best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors.

    We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.