3scale API Management vs Pipedream comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Red Hat Logo
5,114 views|3,544 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Pipedream Logo
62 views|23 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between 3scale API Management and Pipedream based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed 3scale API Management vs. Pipedream Report (Updated: March 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The standard deployment is very simple.""The most valuable features are the gateway and security features.""The solution is quite lightweight, and the installation is very easy. It's like a two-click installation.""It's good that they aren't adding a lot of features like ESP, etc. It's okay with just being a gateway.""The product is stable.""3scale API Management's best feature is API management.""The gateway is the most valuable feature because it makes it possible for us to gather all traffic into one proxy, which is a good thing.""I like the API automation."

More 3scale API Management Pros →

"The most valuable features of Pipedream are the prebuilt integrations that require no coding.""The most valuable feature of Pipedream is the ability to use Python code in general.""It is a developer-friendly platform that allows writing custom scripts.""The solution enables users to integrate several things."

More Pipedream Pros →

Cons
"3scale API Management only supports restful APIs and doesn't support SOAP.""We tried to use the portal, but we decided that it wasn't enough. The content management system (CMS) is not easy to use if you want to customize things, and it's hard to get someone who has the knowledge to work with the CMS.""The user experience could be better. The developer portal is too complex and hard to configure.""What I'd like to improve in 3scale API Management is its route-limiting feature. Currently, I don't know how to do that effectively on the solution, but in Kong, I know how to do it, so I would love to see route-limiting being easily done on 3scale API Management. It would also be good if there was some authentication that you could do from 3scale API Management because Kong offers that functionality out of the box. What I'd love to see in the next release of 3scale API Management is the ability to integrate more plug-ins easily onto the platform, so you'll be able to extend it, and even do customs management. If Red Hat could offer that extension where it allows the internal organization where 3scale API Management is deployed on-premise to integrate its tools on top of 3scale API Management and provide an API for that, that will make the solution very powerful.""The product is not that flexible for developers. It's less flexible and rigid. It's not easy to make changes or customize it.""It would be helpful to improve the customization features so that the customer can do it based on their own needs.""What was suggested by Red Hat was a crucial part of the configuration, but when we started to ask about the supportability of this configuration, Red Hat said only some parts of the configuration would be supported.""I believe the CMS part of it has room for improvement though. That is where you write a couple of things if you want to publish your API. It's based on liquid scripting, which doesn't seem like the obvious ones to script with."

More 3scale API Management Cons →

"They should give more information about trigger failure.""Documentation isn't available for everything in the solution, so you may have to figure out a lot of things by yourself.""We faced some server timeouts.""There is a potential area for improvement in handling loop operations over items."

More Pipedream Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I don't think that 3scale is very expensive."
  • "3scale API Management has reasonable pricing, judging from its competitor, Kong. My organization pays yearly for the 3scale API Management license, though I'm unable to give the exact figure because every single day there are new clusters deployed. I'm in charge of three to four clusters in my team, but give or take, it costs a few thousand lakhs."
  • "The cost was around $45,000 per year."
  • "The pricing is affordable, it's cheap."
  • More 3scale API Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Price-wise, for a company, it is a nice product, but for personal use, it is not very beneficial."
  • "The product price is fair and inexpensive than one of the competitors."
  • More Pipedream Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution is affordable. I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap.
    Top Answer:The tool can improve API management and UI.
    Top Answer:It is a developer-friendly platform that allows writing custom scripts.
    Top Answer:The product price is fair and inexpensive than Zapier.
    Top Answer:They could provide seamless integration with Jira, similar to classic code integration. Additionally, they should give more information about trigger failure.
    Ranking
    12th
    out of 66 in API Management
    Views
    5,114
    Comparisons
    3,544
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    441
    Rating
    7.2
    18th
    out of 66 in API Management
    Views
    62
    Comparisons
    23
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    611
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    3scale is an API management platform that delivers flexible, highly scalable solutions to package, distribute, control, and monetize your APIs, giving you the power to make the most of your API program.

    • Share company data, content, or services through Web or mobile applications.
    • Provide an API to external organizations, internal teams, or both.
    • Avoid the hassle and constant maintenance of building a solution from scratch.

    3scale delivers centralized API management features through a distributed, cloud-hosted layer. The platform includes built-in features to help you build a more successful API program, including access control, rate limits, payment gateway integration, and developer experience tools.

    Pipedream is an innovative workflow automation platform designed to streamline and simplify complex data integrations and workflows. Its primary use case is to connect various applications, services, and APIs, enabling seamless data transfer and automation across different systems.

    The most valuable functionality of Pipedream is its ability to create and manage workflows using a visual interface. Users can easily build and customize workflows by connecting different actions and triggers, without the need for coding. Pipedream supports a wide range of triggers and actions, allowing users to automate tasks such as data extraction, transformation, and loading, as well as event-driven actions like sending notifications or updating databases.

    Pipedream helps organizations by reducing manual effort and improving efficiency. It enables teams to automate repetitive tasks, freeing up valuable time and resources. With its extensive library of pre-built integrations and connectors, Pipedream simplifies the process of connecting and integrating various systems, eliminating the need for custom development. This empowers organizations to quickly build and deploy complex workflows, accelerating their digital transformation initiatives.

    Furthermore, Pipedream provides real-time monitoring and debugging capabilities, allowing users to track the execution of workflows and troubleshoot any issues. It also offers advanced features like version control and collaboration, enabling teams to work together on building and maintaining workflows.

    Sample Customers
    Victor Ops, Coca Cola, The Telegraph, Skava, Orange, Typeform
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business45%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise65%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    3scale API Management vs. Pipedream
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about 3scale API Management vs. Pipedream and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    3scale API Management is ranked 12th in API Management with 10 reviews while Pipedream is ranked 18th in API Management with 4 reviews. 3scale API Management is rated 7.4, while Pipedream is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of 3scale API Management writes "Useful as it lets you add a backend to the product, it integrates well with clusters, and it has exceptional technical support, but route-limiting isn't easy to do on it". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pipedream writes " A tool that ensures that its users see a return on investment from its use". 3scale API Management is most compared with Amazon API Gateway, Kong Gateway Enterprise, Apigee, IBM API Connect and WSO2 API Manager, whereas Pipedream is most compared with . See our 3scale API Management vs. Pipedream report.

    See our list of best API Management vendors.

    We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.