Cisco UCS B-Series vs Lenovo Flex System comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo
2,034 views|1,517 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Lenovo Logo
661 views|500 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco UCS B-Series and Lenovo Flex System based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Blade Servers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Lenovo Flex System Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features of the Cisco UCS B-Series are reports for virtualization and the large memory it has.""I like that the hardware is separated from the software definition of the components.""The solution is stable.""The scalability is good because it comes with Fabric Interconnects, and you can directly add more blades as you go. Therefore, scalability is not a problem.""The most valuable feature is the ability to replace a server with another one, simply by applying the profile""The most valuable features are monitoring and processing, which can handle a lot of throughput and are more powerful than the HPE series.""The product is easy to use.""The feature that I found the most value is the abstract and stateless capacities."

More Cisco UCS B-Series Pros →

"The Lenovo Flex System is very stable.""The stability and speed are always good. The processor is good and it's still working with our loads.""The initial setup is straightforward.""The most valuable feature of the Lenovo Flex System is the storage system.""The product is very user-friendly and has many resources at the enterprise level.""Flex System's best features are its performance and stability.""One of the most valuable features of this solution is its ease of use."

More Lenovo Flex System Pros →

Cons
"The management interface needs a lot of improvement. As it is right now, it's a pain to use. It's not user-friendly.""HTML5 interface is a much needed improvement over the old Java interface, but still needs a little work.""The solution is difficult to set up.""The initial setup process is complex.""The solution’s pricing could be improved and made cheaper.""The UCS manager interface needs to be cleaned up a bit and can be streamlined, but no major complaints.""The solution’s technical support could be better.""Cisco is expensive and difficult to manage. The product is not intuitive. It also needs to improve storage management and upgrades."

More Cisco UCS B-Series Cons →

"Forced restarts due to free upgrades is an issue that needs to be resolved. We can manage this as we have high availability and redundancy, but without that it could be a real problem.""The most valuable feature of the Lenovo Flex System is the storage system.""The user-interface needs improvement, because they have an application from which we have to manage the whole system and all the infrastructure. This application is not working at our premises, because of some problem with the hardware itself. So although we brought it with our systems, and we used it to manage all the systems: the storage, the switches, and everything, nevertheless we have to support every part alone and enter the interface in one-by-one.""Flex System's integration with the XClarity Management System could be improved.""The product could improve its integration capabilities.""The solution could improve by providing more integration with other platforms.""It does not have the same module flexibility that was present in IBM Blade. On the Blade System, I was able to choose between the Cisco module, or BMC module. Since the switch to Lenovo, I have not had the same choice of modules, only the BMC modules."

More Lenovo Flex System Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It makes much more sense for individual licenses for distributed environments"
  • "Make sure you work with a vendor partner than can get you a substantial discount off of list pricing."
  • "The type of service level purchase will determine the level of support response that you receive from Cisco."
  • "The price of this solution is a little bit higher, but given that this system is Cisco, it feels more secure and dependable."
  • "Cisco products are at the high end in terms of cost, but everything is included with the licensing fees."
  • "The pricing for Cisco is less than for the HP Proliant series."
  • "The pricing for Cisco products is always high."
  • "Pricing with Cisco is very high."
  • More Cisco UCS B-Series Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We have the whole maintenance for the 3 years, starting the deployment. We also have the VMware license for 3 years and I think we have another license to buy. There are no additional costs besides licensing."
  • "The price is interesting. I am able to quote a client based on their needs and offer them either Lenovo or Dell."
  • "There is a one-off payment to buy the equipment and the support is purchased annually."
  • "The is an annual license cost to use the Lenovo Flex System. If the price was less expensive and flexible overall and for additional features, our customers would be happier."
  • "The 14 blade server allows significant room for upscaling before having to invest in another chassis. You would have to purchase another chassis much sooner in the case of an eight or nine blade server."
  • More Lenovo Flex System Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easily scalable.
    Top Answer:It is not a yearly subscription but a yearly support renewal that you need to do for Cisco UCS B-Series.
    Top Answer:There are some shortcomings in the product when you look at it from the perspective of the area involving multiple configurations, making it an aspect where improvements are required. The server… more »
    Top Answer:Flex System's best features are its performance and stability.
    Top Answer:The is an annual license cost to use the Lenovo Flex System. If the price was less expensive and flexible overall and for additional features, our customers would be happier.
    Top Answer:Flex System's integration with the XClarity Management System could be improved.
    Ranking
    3rd
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    2,034
    Comparisons
    1,517
    Reviews
    19
    Average Words per Review
    422
    Rating
    8.6
    10th
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    661
    Comparisons
    500
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    329
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    UCS B-Series, Unified Computing System B-Series
    Flex System Blade Servers, Flex System SN Series
    Learn More
    Cisco
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Based on Intel Xeon processor E7 and E5 product families, Cisco UCS B-Series Blade Servers work with virtualized and non-virtualized applications to increase: Performance, Energy efficiency, Flexibility and Administrator productivity.

    Flex System is Lenovo’s proven, 2nd generation blade, that efficiently runs your infrastructure applications with up to 80% better density than standard rack server deployments.

    Sample Customers
    Aegean Motorway, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Anonymous Banking Group, Artoni Transporti, Bellevue, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Hertz, Houston Methodist, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Lufthansa Systems GmbH & Co.KG, Outscale, Sony Corporation, Talbots
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Manufacturing Company17%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Government9%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise58%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Lenovo Flex System
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Lenovo Flex System and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco UCS B-Series is ranked 3rd in Blade Servers with 64 reviews while Lenovo Flex System is ranked 10th in Blade Servers with 7 reviews. Cisco UCS B-Series is rated 8.6, while Lenovo Flex System is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco UCS B-Series writes "Robust hardware and efficient management of hardware, creating group policies, such as scrub policies and maintenance policies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Lenovo Flex System writes "Provides a high initial ceiling before upscaling is required, user-friendly and rich in resources, but has occasional stability issues". Cisco UCS B-Series is most compared with HPE Synergy, Dell PowerEdge M, HPE BladeSystem, Super Micro SuperBlade and HPE Superdome X, whereas Lenovo Flex System is most compared with HPE Superdome X, HPE Synergy and Dell PowerEdge M. See our Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Lenovo Flex System report.

    See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

    We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.