Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Azure Site Recovery Logo

Azure Site Recovery Reviews

Vendor: Microsoft
4.0 out of 5
Badge Leader
Leave a review

What is Azure Site Recovery?

Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.

Get the Azure Site Recovery Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Azure Site Recovery, Commvault Cloud, VMware Live Recovery and more!
Azure Site Recovery is the #3 ranked solution in top Disaster Recovery as a Service providers. PeerSpot users give Azure Site Recovery an average rating of 8.0 out of 10. Azure Site Recovery is most commonly compared to Commvault Cloud: Azure Site Recovery vs Commvault Cloud. Azure Site Recovery is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 56% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 16% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Azure Site Recovery
August 2025
Get the report
Helped 865,738 peers since 2012

Featured Azure Site Recovery reviews

Read more reviews

Azure Site Recovery mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of Azure Site Recovery in the Disaster Recovery as a Service category stands at 23.5%, up from 21.9% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Disaster Recovery as a Service Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Azure Site Recovery23.5%
VMware Live Recovery19.0%
Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service11.4%
Other46.1%
Disaster Recovery as a Service

PeerResearch reports based on Azure Site Recovery reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryDisaster Recovery as a ServiceAug 25, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 25, 2025Download
ComparisonAzure Site Recovery vs VMware Live RecoveryAug 25, 2025Download
ComparisonAzure Site Recovery vs Commvault CloudAug 25, 2025Download
ComparisonAzure Site Recovery vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a ServiceAug 25, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Commvault Cloud4.310.4%95%111 interviewsAdd to research
VMware Live Recovery4.119.0%88%81 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Azure Site Recovery offers notable features such as seamless disaster recovery, automated file synchronization, user-friendly console, and load balancing. The system provides efficient failover and recovery, reliable performance, cost savings, and scalability. Users appreciate its ease of setup, security, visibility through dashboards, and ability to minimize downtime. Azure Site Recovery effectively handles data replication, ensuring data consistency across servers. Organizations find its cost-effectiveness and compatibility with existing Azure services advantageous for enterprise-level use.
  • "A major benefit is that you do not want to pay any more for huge costs to build a DR site."
  • "The features I find most valuable in Azure Site Recovery include the test failover, which allows us to test our site recovery without bringing down the primary; disaster recovery provides that feature."
  • "The most valuable features of Azure Site Recovery are its ease of use and speed of recovery."

Room for Improvement

Azure Site Recovery requires improvement in its pricing model and error logging. Users find the deployment complex and express concerns about replication, failover processes, and limited integration. They request enhancements in scalability, support, synchronization, security features, and automation capabilities. Integration with additional platforms and increased monitoring features are desired, alongside quicker response times from technical support and clearer communication about costs and updates.
  • "Recently, I worked with a mass issue related to Recovery Services Vault, and the VM support engineers are taking a lot of time to extend support to the customer."
  • "The flexibility of Azure Site Recovery regarding integration with different IT environments is limited; it is purely an Azure platform service for business continuity, not meant for integration with other services."
  • "The system did go down a couple of times, which impacted our operations. For stability, I would rate it a seven out of ten."

ROI

Azure Site Recovery delivers a positive return on investment by simplifying processes and enhancing reliability. It's more cost-effective than establishing a second data center and saves time by ensuring quick VM activation. Compared to other solutions, it reduces VM backup and restore time by 30%. While its service level justifies the cost, smaller companies may not actively measure return as it serves more as a security feature. Time-saving features promote resource efficiency.

Pricing

Azure Site Recovery offers flexible pricing that varies based on factors such as storage, network traffic, and resource usage. Enterprise buyers note that while the cost is neither very low nor excessively high, it can be somewhat challenging to estimate accurately due to fluctuating variables. Licensing is consumption-based, leading to some complexity in billing, yet many find it reasonably priced or cost-effective compared to traditional disaster recovery solutions.
  • "The tool is expensive. What is expensive to me might not be expensive to you. As I mentioned, we seek ways to reduce our costs. If the price goes down, that would be great. I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."
  • "Azure Site Recovery is a very reasonably priced product."
  • "Azure Site Recovery is affordable."

Popular Use Cases

Azure Site Recovery is primarily used for disaster recovery, ensuring continuity during failures. It helps organizations replicate data from on-premises to Azure, providing a backup for environments. Businesses across various sectors like healthcare and hospitality utilize it for compliance and business continuity. They manage critical infrastructure and execute migrations, occasionally conducting drills to validate recovery plans. Many find it valuable for reducing downtime and costs associated with maintaining physical disaster recovery sites.

Service and Support

Azure Site Recovery customer service and support receive mixed feedback. Many users commend Microsoft's support as helpful and professional, giving ratings up to nine out of ten. However, others report slow response times and communication challenges, leading to ratings as low as five out of ten. While some appreciate quick ticket resolution, others find the process cumbersome, especially for non-partners. Some rely on partners for assistance before contacting Microsoft directly. Satisfaction varies widely among different users.

Deployment

Azure Site Recovery's initial setup is generally easy and uncomplicated. It involves installing clients and configuring the site recovery, often completed in hours or days. Complexity can arise depending on infrastructure and data size. External support may be necessary, particularly from Microsoft or experienced partners. Many find documentation limited, making expertise vital. Synchronization takes longer, especially with large VMs, and can involve multiple team members responsible for networking and cloud tasks.

Scalability

Azure Site Recovery offers high scalability, supporting a wide range of users from small businesses to large enterprises. Feedback varies, with most finding it effective and flexible for disaster recovery. Some mention dependencies on regional capacity, but generally, it accommodates extensive usage. Some rate its scalability highly, appreciating ease of use and cost-effectiveness. Organizations experience varying scalability levels, sometimes influenced by setup and geographical factors, but generally find it adaptable for different needs.

Stability

Azure Site Recovery is widely recognized as a stable offering. Most users experience consistent performance, with ratings often ranging between seven to ten out of ten. Occasional issues have occurred, but stability remains strong. It is described as generally reliable, with some experiencing exceptional consistency. Stability is contingent upon specific situations, but the consensus highlights its robustness and dependability.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Azure Site Recovery Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise14
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business113
Midsize Enterprise66
Large Enterprise232
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
8%
University
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
Real Estate/Law Firm
5%
Media Company
4%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Construction Company
3%
Government
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Legal Firm
3%
Hospitality Company
3%
Educational Organization
2%
Retailer
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Logistics Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Agriculture
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%

Compare Azure Site Recovery with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Azure Site Recovery

Azure Site Recovery customers

Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace

Related questions

  • 50
Why is disaster recovery important?
  • 84
Can you recommend a disaster recovery automation tool?
  • 120
What is the difference between cyber resilience and business continuity?
  • 6
When should an enterprise choose a Disaster Recovery-as-a-Service (DRaaS) solution?
  • 18
Which device do you recommend to use for traffic shaping & bandwidth optimization between P2P links?
  • 2
When evaluating Disaster Recovery as a Service, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 3
Why is Disaster Recovery as a Service important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Disaster Recovery as a Service

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Commvault Cloud vs Azure Site Recovery Logo
Commvault Cloud vs Azure Site Recovery
VMware Live Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery Logo
VMware Live Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery
Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs Azure Site Recovery Logo
Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs Azure Site Recovery
Druva Phoenix vs Azure Site Recovery Logo
Druva Phoenix vs Azure Site Recovery
Arcserve Cloud Direct vs Azure Site Recovery Logo
Arcserve Cloud Direct vs Azure Site Recovery
IBM Disaster Recovery Services vs Azure Site Recovery Logo
IBM Disaster Recovery Services vs Azure Site Recovery
Lumen SafeHaven vs Azure Site Recovery Logo
Lumen SafeHaven vs Azure Site Recovery
See all alternatives
 
Azure Site Recovery Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
IT Manager at NTT DATA4.5I've used Azure Site Recovery for disaster recovery for several years. It's cost-effective with 99.95% availability, enabling efficient data replication and failover testing. However, agent updates must be current, and support response times can be slow.
Client Relationship Manager at Infomag3.5As a System Integrator and Microsoft partner, I utilize Azure Site Recovery for disaster recovery, valuing its 99.99% SLA for uptime. While patch management and support escalation need improvement, the robust service justifies its higher cost.
Chief Technology Officer at a insurance company with 51-200 employees3.5We used Azure Site Recovery to ensure uptime for our core client-facing engine. Its ease of use and quick recovery were valuable, with no significant issues encountered. While not a major expense, we didn't calculate its ROI as it was a safeguard.
Senior Infrastructure Engineer at MIC Global4.0We migrated around seventy on-prem servers to Azure using Site Recovery for disaster recovery, benefiting from easy setup and automation. While it saves time, it lacks support for shared disks and services like AppConfig compared to previous VMware solutions.
Vice President of Delivery & Deployment at TekFriday Inc3.5I use Azure Site Recovery for cross-region disaster recovery, valuing its test failover and custom dashboards. However, integration flexibility is limited, and improvements are needed in user experience and support. Overall, I find its functionality satisfactory.
Consultant at SoftwareONE4.0I rely on Azure Site Recovery to support large environments with complex applications by providing a secondary site for disaster recovery. While automated failover features are valuable, the platform could improve with better monitoring and more automation APIs for efficiency.
Senior System Administrator at Douthitt.net5.0I use Azure Site Recovery primarily for VM backup due to its ease of synchronization and quick RTO, which saves significant time over Veeam. However, it requires performance enhancements and needs to be more user-friendly for full CDP replacement.
IT infrastructure and services at United Bank for Africa3.5I use Azure Site Recovery for business continuity, replacing our previous on-prem infrastructure. The solution needs improvement in replication, failover processes, and cost baseline. Overall, it supports our needs but has room for enhancement in key areas.