Polarion ALM Reviews

Name: Polarion ALM
Brand: Siemens
Rating: 3.9 (23 reviews)

3.9 out of 5

23 reviews
88% willing to recommend

What is Polarion ALM?

The world’s first 100% browser-based ALM enterprise solution, which enables seamless collaboration across disparate teams, multi-directionally linked work items, full traceability, accelerated productivity and automated proof of compliance.

Get the Polarion ALM Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Polarion ALM, GitLab, Microsoft Azure DevOps and more!

Polarion ALM is the #6 ranked solution in top Application Lifecycle Management Suites and top Enterprise Agile Planning Tools. PeerSpot users give Polarion ALM an average rating of 7.8 out of 10. Polarion ALM is most commonly compared to GitLab: Polarion ALM vs GitLab. Polarion ALM is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 65% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 28% of all views.

Helped 864,053 peers since 2012

Featured Polarion ALM reviews

Dina Bindi

Information and Communication technology at CNH Industrial

It's extremely flexible. Configuring items is straightforward and doesn't require involving the supplier each time. We find the requirement management, test management, documentation, and dashboards very effective. However, we don't use DevOps-related features, such as integration with tools like SVN or Git, because we use Azure DevOps. The aspects related to requirements, testing, changes, tasks, and agile methodology are excellent, which is why we've been using it for a long time.

Read full review

Davide Messia

Co Founder at CieDIWEB

It is a scalable solution. Scalability- I don't know now about the tool's scalability because I am not the admin or on any projects with the tool. I am just using the product since it is a compatible tool. Around 100 people use the tool in my company. I use the product every day. Mostly, I am connected to Polarion ALM because it is used for product testing and to make dashboards. With Polarion ALM, I can start off with Excel and do some of the classic management stuff. I am a test manager who is the main user of the tool.

Read full review

Michael Hengst

Vice President Operations and acting Head of Safety at HyperloopTT

It is an effective solution to improve development processes with a single, unified platform requirements, coding, testing, and release. Nevertheless, the user interface is not yet optimized. Import functions could be improved also to make the upload of structured requirement documents easier and to import those into the database. It works yet requires effort during customization. Future versions should support better workflows and task management.

Read full review

Polarion ALM mindshare

Product category:

As of August 2025, the mindshare of Polarion ALM in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category stands at 8.3%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

PeerResearch reports based on Polarion ALM reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites	Jul 31, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Jul 31, 2025	Download
Comparison	Polarion ALM vs Jira	Jul 31, 2025	Download
Comparison	Polarion ALM vs Microsoft Azure DevOps	Jul 31, 2025	Download
Comparison	Polarion ALM vs Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM)	Jul 31, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
GitLab	4.2	N/A	97%	85 interviews Add to research
Microsoft Azure DevOps	4.1	14.8%	95%	135 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

Polarion ALM's most valuable features include robust traceability, comprehensive requirement management, and effective document control. Its user-friendly interface supports seamless workflow configuration and offers strong integration capabilities. Users appreciate the all-in-one nature, facilitating real-time collaboration and project tracking. Document management is particularly praised for its flexibility. The system supports agile practices, enhances task monitoring, and provides efficient planning resources. Its adaptability and control over product changes make it beneficial across various industries.

"Polarion ALM is excellent for tracking who is working on what and how many people are involved in a project."
"Polarion ALM delivers both document views and table views simultaneously and organizes configurations according to norms and standards."
"It's extremely flexible. Configuring items is straightforward and doesn't require involving the supplier each time. We find the requirement management, test management, documentation, and dashboards very effective."

Room for Improvement

Polarion ALM requires a more intuitive interface and enhanced integration with various external tools, including JIRA and Azure DevOps. Import processes need simplification. High pricing, limited user-friendly features, and outdated tutorials pose issues for smaller companies. Performance improvements are necessary for loading times and database migrations. Planning, task management, and reporting capabilities require enhancement. Continuous enhancements in automation and collaboration features are needed, along with improved technical support and cost-effective licensing options.

"The user interface of Polarion ALM needs improvement as it can experience changes that disrupt workflows, especially during major updates."
"The system’s technology is not the most current, leading to missing features that are common in web-based applications."
"I also recently suggested that CMS consider incorporating generative artificial intelligence into the system."

Pricing

Polarion ALM's pricing is perceived as expensive, particularly for smaller enterprises. It follows a yearly licensing model with added maintenance and support costs. While some find it comparable to other solutions like Integrity, others say it is one of the most costly options. Optional plugins and third-party solutions can further increase expenses. Multi-year subscriptions may offer better rates, and costs generally vary depending on user needs and existing agreements.

"It is an expensive product."
"You have to pay around 50-60 euros per user."
"Software for medical devices is always expensive."

Popular Use Cases

Polarion ALM is used primarily for requirements engineering and application lifecycle management across various industries. Teams utilize it for task planning, documentation, and testing. It supports software and medical device development, assisting in compliance and regulatory needs. It integrates with SVN and GitLab for version control. Organizations use it in development, project management, and testing processes, ensuring effective requirement tracking and validation. Its versatility and integration capabilities make it popular for complex multi-project environments.

Service and Support

Customer service and support for Polarion ALM receives mixed assessments. Some find it good and quick to respond, while others experience varying levels of expertise. Hidden resources can be accessed through direct inquiries. Pre-acquisition support was noted as better. Several companies use their own support teams alongside Siemens for advanced needs. Some rate the support highly, yet raising tickets can be slow for minor issues. Frequent feedback highlights a need for improved direct problem resolution.

Deployment

Polarion ALM's initial setup is generally straightforward for many, taking a few hours. However, it can become complex with customization and load balancing. Some found it user-friendly, though others noted the need for good training. It involves integration time, and certain updates may lead to issues. Deployment varies by scenario and customer requirements, sometimes needing significant collaboration and ongoing configuration adjustments for smooth operations.

Scalability

Polarion ALM exhibits a mix of perceptions on scalability. Some users find it easily expandable with the right resources, including server capacity and team support. Others face architectural limitations, especially when managing complex configurations or maintaining large volumes over time. Challenges include non-user-friendly administration and the need for an expanded management team to effectively scale across projects. Despite this, many appreciate its configurability and adaptability to varied requirements.

Stability

Polarion ALM is generally stable with some challenges. Users note slow loading times, especially with over 1000 work items in one LiveDoc, requiring workarounds. Regular downtimes are rare, yet heavy resource consumption can affect performance. Users find it reliable, though deployment and infrastructure impact stability. Some prefer Git over SVN for modern technology requirements. Reporting and dashboard creation take longer, and quick vendor support often resolves minor issues. Stability ratings vary between seven and nine out of ten.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Polarion ALM Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.