Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
JFrog Container Registry Logo

JFrog Container Registry Reviews

Vendor: JFrog
3.7 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Start review

What is JFrog Container Registry?

The JFrog Container Registry is a repository manager, which supports Docker and Helm registries and Generic repositories, allowing you to build, deploy and manage your container images while providing powerful features with fine-grained permission control behind a sleek and easy-to-use UI.

Get the JFrog Container Registry Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about JFrog Container Registry, Harbor, Amazon ECR and more!
JFrog Container Registry is the #1 ranked solution in top Container Registry solutions. PeerSpot users give JFrog Container Registry an average rating of 7.4 out of 10. JFrog Container Registry is most commonly compared to Harbor: JFrog Container Registry vs Harbor. JFrog Container Registry is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 68% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 16% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
JFrog Container Registry
May 2025
Get the report
Helped 853,831 peers since 2012

Featured JFrog Container Registry reviews

Read more reviews

JFrog Container Registry mindshare

As of June 2025, the mindshare of JFrog Container Registry in the Container Registry category stands at 30.7%, up from 27.7% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Registry

PeerResearch reports based on JFrog Container Registry reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryContainer RegistryJun 1, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersJun 1, 2025Download
ComparisonJFrog Container Registry vs Amazon ECRJun 1, 2025Download
ComparisonJFrog Container Registry vs HarborJun 1, 2025Download
ComparisonJFrog Container Registry vs Azure Container RegistryJun 1, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Harbor4.027.1%100%2 interviewsAdd to research
Amazon ECR4.417.7%100%21 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

JFrog Container Registry's most valuable features include code scanning and seamless integration with development and operations workflows. It supports hybrid SaaS environments and multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP. Users appreciate the integration with JFrog Xray for vulnerability detection in containers and Helm charts. It supports enterprise-grade private container registries with JFrog Artifactory and facilitates end-to-end CI/CD pipelines on Kubernetes, enhancing the SDLC lifecycle and meeting sprint targets.
  • "We have integrated JFrog Xray, and we use it for storage purposes."
  • "It supports multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP."
  • "We use the solution to compile the codes before publishing them. We utilize third-party containers and codes, downloading them to the JFrog Container Registry. Developers then access it from the JFrog Container Registry, and there's a specific job responsible for running and validating all security checks, ensuring compatibility. If there are any issues or if packages require updates, we manage those updates through this system."

Room for Improvement

JFrog Container Registry faces challenges in performance, particularly during data fetching from GitHub, and needs improvements in documentation clarity, especially for cloud offerings. Users encounter a learning curve initially and find documentation lacks transparency on pricing. Storage costs can become exceptionally high, with little guidance on plan optimization. Advanced security integrations beyond basic scanning and better vulnerability scanning categorization are necessary, along with enhanced automation for pipeline promotions based on quality and vulnerabilities.
  • "The solution's documentation available over the internet is not straightforward and customer-friendly."
  • "In my experience, there was a bit of a learning curve at the beginning. It can be somewhat challenging to install and get started."
  • "One challenge we face is related to performance. Our integration involves GitHab and JFrog Container Registry, with pipelines fetching data from GitHub and JFrog Container Registry for third-party code. However, there are instances where this process can slow down the pipeline."

Pricing

JFrog Container Registry users report that pricing is perceived as expensive, particularly compared to competitors. Some utilize the Pro version to manage 6GB data, with Enterprise plans around $750 under evaluation. Users appreciate various offerings such as self-hosted and cloud options, which factor in licenses, subscriptions, and nodes, though some rate pricing low on affordability. Annual licensing costs of $3 are deemed reasonable by a few users.
  • "JFrog Container Registry is a very expensive solution."
  • "The pricing is somewhat expensive compared to its competitors. We use the Pro version."
  • "The solution is expensive."

Popular Use Cases

JFrog Container Registry is primarily utilized for compiling codes, storing software artifacts, and managing packages and containers throughout the software supply chain. It integrates with various tools and supports build-to-release processes. Users push images and Helm charts for Kubernetes environments, deploy enterprise-grade private container registries with JFrog Artifactory, set up CI/CD pipelines, and perform security scans to address vulnerabilities.

Service and Support

JFrog Container Registry's tech support team is described as responsive, yet some users note that their response time could be improved. Many have not personally engaged with the team, relying on managers for past interactions. Others haven't needed support at all. Users find documentation straightforward and useful.

Deployment

Several users found JFrog Container Registry's initial setup straightforward, especially those with prior experience. DevOps engineers highlighted ease of use and familiarity with JFrog, estimating setup time between 15 to 30 minutes when configured correctly. Teams with previous knowledge faced fewer challenges. Others relied on documentation and online resources, noting a less developed user interface in earlier versions. Setup complexity varied with tools like Azure DevOps, GitLab, and Jenkins.

Scalability

JFrog Container Registry has a decent standing in scalability, rated eight out of ten by some users. Around half to two-thirds of teams incorporate it into their workflows. With a team of 35 developers, they praise it yet see cloud-based alternatives like Nexus as slightly superior. Users typically find no issues but mention a limitation with large file uploads, specifically with a 3.5 GB Kubernetes artifact being too large for upload due to restrictions.

Stability

Many users rate JFrog Container Registry's stability an eight out of ten. They experience reliable performance, especially for CI/CD workflows, with efficient automation. However, some encounter issues like lagging or crashing, particularly when downloading multiple artifacts concurrently. Despite occasional network exceptions, most find it stable and well-suited for integration with IoT device management.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our JFrog Container Registry Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
Retailer
4%
Government
4%
Insurance Company
4%
University
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Media Company
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
2%
Construction Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Engineering Company
1%

Compare JFrog Container Registry with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about JFrog Container Registry

JFrog Container Registry customers

Facebook, Airbus, Dell, Slack, Volvo, Netflix, Spotify, T-Systems, Mastercard

Related questions

  • 5
When evaluating Container Registry, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 30
Why is Container Registry important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Container Registry

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Harbor vs JFrog Container Registry Logo
Harbor vs JFrog Container Registry
Amazon ECR vs JFrog Container Registry Logo
Amazon ECR vs JFrog Container Registry
Azure Container Registry vs JFrog Container Registry Logo
Azure Container Registry vs JFrog Container Registry
Red Hat Quay vs JFrog Container Registry Logo
Red Hat Quay vs JFrog Container Registry
VMware Harbor Registry vs JFrog Container Registry Logo
VMware Harbor Registry vs JFrog Container Registry
See all alternatives
 

JFrog Container Registry reviews

Sort by:
SS
Senior Consultant at Mettler-Toledo International Inc.
Verified user of JFrog Container Registry
May 9, 2025
Eases artifact management and boosts SDLC efficiency with robust vulnerability scanning

What is our primary use case?

My usual use cases of JFrog Container Registry involve containerizing all our applications and storing the generated Docker containers and custom Helm charts into JFrog. We also perform X-ray scans with JFrog to segregate vulnerabilities into categories such as critical, high, medium, and low, and we take fixes for critical and high vulnerabilities while writing certain rules for tags that have been pushed into the repository.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature of JFrog Container Registry for me has been the X-ray scans because when we ship the product, we need to ensure that there are no vulnerabilities in our application, and X-ray helps us find vulnerabilities in our containers or Helm charts.

I have seen organizational value from JFrog Container Registry in our SDLC lifecycle, as it plays an important role in making the development lifecycle faster and adhering to sprint targets.
*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Read full review (874 words)
MD
Senior Cloud/DevOps Engineer
Verified user of JFrog Container Registry
Apr 21, 2025
Enable end-to-end pipeline building with improved security integration and documentation

What is our primary use case?

I am using JFrog Container Registry for various projects that involve using different Docker setups for an enterprise-grade private container registry with JFrog Artifactory. I have set up high availability JFrog instances on Kubernetes, configured local and remote repositories for container images, and more. I have built an end-to-end CI/CD pipeline with JFrog and the registry on Kubernetes, utilizing Jenkins, JFrog X-ray, and more.

What is most valuable?

I am using JFrog Container Registry for various projects that involve using different Docker setups for an enterprise-grade private container registry with JFrog Artifactory. I have set up high availability JFrog instances on Kubernetes, configured local and remote repositories for container images, and more. I have built an end-to-end CI/CD pipeline with JFrog and the registry on Kubernetes, utilizing Jenkins, JFrog X-ray, and more.
*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Read full review (546 words)
Buyer's Guide
JFrog Container Registry
Download free report
Find out what your peers are saying about JFrog Container Registry. Updated May 2025
853,831 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sai Balaji Bonagiri - PeerSpot user
DevOps Engineer at Infosys
Verified user of JFrog Container Registry
Apr 17, 2024
Self-hosted and works well in hybrid SaaS environments and automation is fast without any breakdowns

Pros

"It supports multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP."

Cons

"In my experience, there was a bit of a learning curve at the beginning. It can be somewhat challenging to install and get started."

What is our primary use case?

JFrog Container Registry acts as a single solution for storing and managing all of our software artifacts. This includes packages, files, and containers throughout our software supply chain. 

We have a central JFrog server, and we integrate various tools with it. The artifacts are stored there. It helps us manage the process from build to release.

How has it helped my organization?

There are several aspects. We use it to store container access information securely. We've also implemented authentication mechanisms like SAML, download blocking, and virtual IT consoles. 

For repository optimization, we've used the file store feature within JFrog Container Registry.

The security features in JFrog Container Registry have helped protect the integrity of the Docker images.

*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Read full review (622 words)
GO
Sr. Systems Engineer at The TCW Group
Verified user of JFrog Container Registry
Jan 5, 2024
Acts as a central repository and comes with code scanning feature

Pros

"We use the solution to compile the codes before publishing them. We utilize third-party containers and codes, downloading them to the JFrog Container Registry. Developers then access it from the JFrog Container Registry, and there's a specific job responsible for running and validating all security checks, ensuring compatibility. If there are any issues or if packages require updates, we manage those updates through this system. "

Cons

"One challenge we face is related to performance. Our integration involves GitHab and JFrog Container Registry, with pipelines fetching data from GitHub and JFrog Container Registry for third-party code. However, there are instances where this process can slow down the pipeline. "

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution to compile the codes before publishing them. We utilize third-party containers and codes, downloading them to the JFrog Container Registry. Developers then access it from the JFrog Container Registry, and there's a specific job responsible for running and validating all security checks, ensuring compatibility. If there are any issues or if packages require updates, we manage those updates through this system.

How has it helped my organization?

The product offers a centralized repository. 

*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Read full review (319 words)
Muhammad Usman Khawar - PeerSpot user
Software Engineer (DevOps/ SRE) at Sensys LLC
Verified user of JFrog Container Registry
May 18, 2024
Used for storage purposes, but its pricing could be improved

Pros

"We have integrated JFrog Xray, and we use it for storage purposes."

Cons

"The solution's documentation available over the internet is not straightforward and customer-friendly."

What is our primary use case?

We push our images and Helm charts to the JFrog Container Registry. Since we have a Kubernetes-based environment, these images and Helm charts are pulled from the Kubernetes cluster and deployed.

What is most valuable?

We have integrated JFrog Xray, and we use it for storage purposes.

*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Read full review (458 words)