Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo

Check Point CloudGuard WAF Reviews

Vendor: Check Point Software Technologies
4.4 out of 5
Badge Leader
Leave a review

What is Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers advanced security for web applications and APIs with features such as intrusion prevention, bot prevention, and AI-driven threat detection, ensuring organizations achieve high-level protection and efficient security management.

Get the Check Point CloudGuard WAF Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard WAF, SonarQube, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and more!
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is the #5 ranked solution in application security solutions and #8 ranked solution in top Web Application Firewalls. PeerSpot users give Check Point CloudGuard WAF an average rating of 8.8 out of 10. Check Point CloudGuard WAF is most commonly compared to SonarQube: Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs SonarQube. Check Point CloudGuard WAF is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 49% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 18% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Check Point CloudGuard WAF
January 2026
Get the report
Helped 881,455 peers since 2012

Featured Check Point CloudGuard WAF reviews

Read more reviews

Check Point CloudGuard WAF mindshare

Product category:
Application Security Tools
As of February 2026, the mindshare of Check Point CloudGuard WAF in the Application Security Tools category stands at 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Check Point CloudGuard WAF0.5%
SonarQube16.9%
Checkmarx One9.9%
Other72.7%
Application Security Tools

PeerResearch reports based on Check Point CloudGuard WAF reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Security ToolsFeb 3, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersFeb 3, 2026Download
ComparisonCheck Point CloudGuard WAF vs SonarQubeFeb 3, 2026Download
ComparisonCheck Point CloudGuard WAF vs Checkmarx OneFeb 3, 2026Download
ComparisonCheck Point CloudGuard WAF vs VeracodeFeb 3, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
SonarQube4.016.9%83%134 interviewsAdd to research
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks4.2N/A98%113 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Dec 28, 2025

Valuable Features

Check Point CloudGuard WAF stands out for its scalability, easy API integration, and AI-driven threat prevention. Users appreciate its high-grade security features, including Intrusion Prevention System and bot prevention. The automated management and machine learning capabilities reduce false positives and manual configuration. It offers comprehensive protection against OWASP Top 10 threats and zero-day attacks, enhancing application and data security. The intuitive dashboard and compliance support improve workflow efficiency and threat management.
  • "Check Point CloudGuard WAF provides great visibility and flexibility to use multiple FQDNs in a single load balancer."
  • "The main benefits that I have seen from using Check Point CloudGuard WAF is that the security posture is very good, it analyzes and delivers the threats, enriches the intelligence, and I get proper clarity in my organization."
  • "Check Point CloudGuard WAF has been especially helpful here, automatically learning and adjusting protection without requiring constant manual tuning."

Room for Improvement

Check Point CloudGuard WAF requires enhancements in cost efficiency, interface usability, and customization. The user interface needs simplification and real-time monitoring features. Technical support and documentation are insufficient. Initial setup is complex and integrations can be improved, especially with DevOps. Advanced threat protection, API security, and mobile application support need attention. Pricing models are seen as complicated and high. Users also desire faster response times from support teams and more comprehensive reporting features.
  • "I see areas for improvement primarily on the reporting functionality front, as there are very limited functions in the reporting section."
  • "Check Point CloudGuard WAF's support is only available in English."
  • "Check Point CloudGuard WAF is a strong solution, but there are a few areas where it could be improved, particularly the user interface for managing custom rules and exceptions, which could be more intuitive and streamlined to reduce the learning curve for new users, especially when deploying for the first time."

ROI

Check Point CloudGuard WAF delivers substantial returns with investments showing over 70% and sometimes close to 90%. It enhances application security and reduces costs by decreasing server management. Companies see time savings and increased efficiency by eliminating manual tasks. CloudGuard WAF consolidates tools, saving significant annual expenditures. It improves security posture and NIST compliance scores and saves time and resources, reducing total cost of ownership. Some observe benefits in budget management and risk reduction despite having no exact metrics yet.

Pricing

Enterprise users find Check Point CloudGuard WAF's pricing competitive, though it may appear costly compared to some competitors. Licensing is often described as flexible and subscription-based, with some noting complexity in initial cost estimation. Setup costs are generally straightforward, with positive experiences reported. Many appreciate the included features and support, justifying the price. While some believe costs could be reduced, the bundled packages and features offer perceived value, helping organizations manage security needs effectively.
  • "The sales team or account managers from Check Point are top-notch. As I am using other products as well, my pricing was competitive compared to others."
  • "As Infiniti customers, the pricing is manageable, as we have allowances dedicated to each Check Point product. The price is not as high compared to other options I have dealt with in the past."
  • "The base solution costs approximately 30,000 euros, with an additional 2,000 euros per year for licenses and support."

Popular Use Cases

Check Point CloudGuard WAF is primarily used to safeguard web applications and APIs from threats like SQL injections, cross-site scripting, and bot attacks. It enhances API protection, intercepts malicious traffic, and ensures compliance across various platforms, including Azure and AWS. Users appreciate its ease of deployment, resource optimization, and real-time threat detection, which helps organizations protect sensitive data and meet security standards efficiently.

Service and Support

Check Point CloudGuard WAF receives mixed feedback for customer service and support. While many find technical assistance prompt, knowledgeable, and effective, others experience delays, especially with more complex issues. Some users appreciate the cooperation and dedication of staff, rating support high. Others suggest enhancements to reduce deficiencies. Despite some seeing room for improvement, many users agree on satisfactory interactions, often rating the service between eight and ten out of ten.

Deployment

Check Point CloudGuard WAF's setup is generally straightforward and easy for users with some background knowledge, thanks to simple configurations and guided onboarding. However, users highlight the need for familiarity with the system for seamless configuration, citing challenges if new to the platform. While most users find deployment efficient and intuitive, others mention complexities with virtual machine setup and documentation, especially in cloud environments like AWS and Azure.

Scalability

Check Point CloudGuard WAF is praised for its high scalability across different environments, with many users highlighting its adaptability and ability to handle growth without issues. The SaaS model provides inherent flexibility, allowing for easy scaling based on traffic needs rather than the number of applications. The licensing model based on traffic makes it practical for various organizational sizes, receiving consistently high ratings for its scalability capabilities.

Stability

Many users describe Check Point CloudGuard WAF as stable, with excellent performance. It reportedly has had minimal interruptions, remaining functional across various devices. Some note occasional issues during configuration, but stability often scores high. Despite a few cases of lag or system downtime linked to licensing, the platform mainly provides reliable service, catering well to needs without significant errors. Users praise its robust and responsive performance, enhancing their peace of mind.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Check Point CloudGuard WAF Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business21
Midsize Enterprise15
Large Enterprise12
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business106
Midsize Enterprise59
Large Enterprise160
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Government
6%
Security Firm
5%
Outsourcing Company
4%
Educational Organization
4%
Transportation Company
4%
University
3%
Healthcare Company
3%
Marketing Services Firm
3%
Performing Arts
2%
Retailer
2%
Non Tech Company
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Construction Company
2%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
2%
Logistics Company
2%
Non Profit
1%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Insurance Company
1%
Media Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Sports Company
1%

Compare Check Point CloudGuard WAF with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Check Point CloudGuard WAF integrates with APIs, providing a seamless security enhancement while reducing false positives. Its scalability supports rapid deployment, valuable for companies aiming to secure resources in clouds like AWS and Azure. Enhanced threat prevention, comprehensive compliance support, and advanced threat protection methods such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting prevention are key strengths. Despite its robust capabilities, there are opportunities for improvement, such as lower costs, improved third-party tool integration, and a more intuitive interface to enhance usability.

What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard WAF?
  • Intrusion Prevention System: Effectively detects and blocks unauthorized access attempts.
  • Bot Prevention: Shields applications from malicious bot traffic.
  • AI-driven Threat Detection: Uses advanced algorithms to identify and mitigate threats.
  • Log Management: Offers extensive logging capabilities for tracking and analysis.
  • Scalability: Supports rapid deployment across different environments, including multi-cloud.
What benefits should users expect from Check Point CloudGuard WAF?
  • Security Efficiency: Combines high-grade protection with ease of use to simplify security management.
  • Cost Efficiency: Aids in effective resource utilization, minimizing overhead.
  • Compliance Support: Helps meet various industry standards effortlessly.
  • Enhanced Threat Protection: Provides robust safeguards against common web vulnerabilities.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF is predominantly applied within industries requiring stringent security standards, such as financial services, healthcare, and e-commerce. Its deployment strengthens the defense of critical APIs, facilitates compliance, and supports efficient multi-cloud security management, aligning well with evolving industry demands.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF was previously known as Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

Related questions

  • 138
If you had to both encrypt and compress data during transmission, which would you do first and why?
  • 46
When evaluating Application Security, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 103
What are the Top 5 cybersecurity trends in 2022?
  • 135
What are the threats associated with using ‘bogus’ cybersecurity tools?
  • 56
We're evaluating Tripwire, what else should we consider?
  • 42
Which application security solutions include both vulnerability scans and quality checks?
  • 385
Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?
  • 40
Why Do I Need Application Security Software?
  • 78
Which Email Security enterprise solution would you choose: Cisco Secure Email vs Forcepoint Email Security vs Barracuda Email Security Gateway?
  • 39
SAST vs. DAST: Which is better for application security testing?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Application Security Tools
Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
SonarQube vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
SonarQube vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Checkmarx One vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Checkmarx One vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Imperva Application Security Platform vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Imperva Application Security Platform vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Fortinet FortiWeb vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Azure Front Door vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Azure Front Door vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF
F5 Advanced WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
F5 Advanced WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Mend.io vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Mend.io vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF
AWS WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
AWS WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF
F5 Distributed Cloud Services vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
F5 Distributed Cloud Services vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Radware Alteon vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Radware Alteon vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF
NGINX App Protect vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
NGINX App Protect vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF
See all alternatives
 
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Assistant Manager at a computer software company with 201-500 employees4.0I've used Check Point CloudGuard WAF for a year to secure web apps and APIs, seeing reduced threats and manual effort, though initial setup and policy tuning were complex, and deeper DevOps integration would enhance its overall effectiveness.
Principal Cybersecurity Specialist at Unitel S.A.4.5We selected Check Point CloudGuard WAF to protect our web applications and APIs without relying on signature updates, providing peace of mind with AI-based features. However, it needs improvement in mobile application protection. The solution integrates well with our existing infrastructure.
Assosiate Vice President at Novac Technology Solutions4.5I've found Check Point CloudGuard WAF flexible, reliable, and cost-effective, with strong FQDN support and low false positives, though its reporting features and SaaS portal latency need improvement. I’d rate it nine out of ten overall.
Sr. VP of Creative & Development at a non-tech company with 51-200 employees5.0I've used Check Point CloudGuard WAF for six years to protect critical web APIs, finding its AI-driven zero-day threat prevention effective and resource-saving, though I’d prefer multilingual support; overall, it’s a reliable, scalable solution.
Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees4.5I use Check Point CloudGuard WAF for its simplicity and effective protection against zero-day attacks. Despite lacking false positives, it improves our security. The solution offers a straightforward interface compared to alternatives like Radware, ensuring a reliable defense.
Ciso at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0I use Check Point CloudGuard WAF for fast assimilation of new marketing products. Its simplicity aids quick deployment, enhancing time to market. While more complex function analysis would be helpful, its ease and speed outweigh past solutions like Radware and Reblaze.
Team Leader, Cloudops & Cloud Architect at a consultancy with 501-1,000 employees3.5I manage a complex global infrastructure across 98 countries, using Check Point CloudGuard WAF to protect thousands of websites and APIs. It effectively blocks threats, reduces false positives, and cuts costs, although further integrations could be beneficial.
Information Technology - Infrastructure and Security at Cyprus Development Bank4.5I use Check Point CloudGuard WAF for our customer-facing servers. It quickly secures services, blocking zero-day attacks and reducing false positives by 90%. However, reporting accuracy needs improvement. Transitioning from on-premise to cloud-based has been notably different.