Azure Web Application Firewall Reviews

I mainly use it for front-facing applications and maintenance work. These are the main applications that I use.

Mainly, it comes with the complete suite of Microsoft services. I can use it in conjunction with the best options and other features that come with it. Configuration is much easier than using different platforms. 

For example, if I have hosted the application in AWS and am using the Application Firewall from Azure, there are certain additional steps to follow when configuring them. With Microsoft, everything is within a single suite, making it easier to configure and plan. 

Azure continually upgrades platforms and sends us messages to upgrade to the next version, simplifying the process. Later, it's much easier if I want to upgrade the software platform, scale it, or move it to a different application host as the whole suite comes together. 

The return on investment is good. If I am doing applications for clients, I can invoice them for better costs. Most applications that I run and use have a better return on investment.

The main use case for Azure Web Application Firewall is to publish anonymous websites.

Two specific use cases come from a gas station company providing fuel and another from a cosmetics company. These are small to medium businesses.

The best features of Azure Web Application Firewall are that it provides security and protection from poorly designed web applications.

I assess the effectiveness of Azure Web Application Firewall in protecting against OWASP Top 10 threats as positive, because we have reports confirming its protection against these types of attacks. It was really effective.

It does not bring any operational impacts such as better efficiency or time-saving; it simply provides the certainty of enhanced protection without operational efficiency improvements.

When discussing protection for OWASP Top 10, Azure Web Application Firewall provides security against the most common attacks based on existing vulnerabilities, ensuring protection against external attacks.

We primarily use the solution for cloud security.

The solution has been very good at helping us avoid DDoS attacks. 

I use it in combination with other things like endpoint security and application security, along with RBAC.

AWS does not have the same level and options to protect secrets such as asset tokens and keys. In Azure, all of this resides within the platform, ensuring a very high level of security. It is almost impossible to access these assets from outside, requiring a very skilled attacker to obtain asset tokens of a customer using Azure.

We use the solution to protect our web applications. It is important to protect web applications from the core, such as SQL injection. We can leverage the built-in Microsoft application, such as Defender, to do this. Application firewalls offer many benefits.

The WAF protection is the most valuable feature.

We are using Azure Web Application Firewall to filter and analyze requests from the end-user part of our application. It also processes requests from browsers to the backend of our application, ensuring that suspicious requests are blocked.

Having the Azure Web Application Firewall installed has made our platform more attractive to customers, as it meets their security requirements. It has increased our platform's security and credibility.

I'm doing a demo of Azure Web Application Firewall for layer 7 protection of the tools I offer to my e-commerce customers. 

Azure WAF has price advantages over other WAF solutions. The pricing model is flexible because you pay on a scale based on the level of protection you need.