2022-04-25T07:48:00Z

Top 8 Single Sign-On (SSO) Tools 2022

NC
  • 87
Published:
Explore related topics
PeerSpot user
2

2 Comments

JT
User
2022-06-03T14:09:26Z
Jun 3, 2022
rtechenthusiast85 - PeerSpot reviewer
Vendor
Top 20
2022-08-17T10:26:16Z
Aug 17, 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Ping Identity and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Related Questions
Ronald Chavez - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 20, 2023
Feb 20, 2023
In recent years Microsoft has really upped its game with Defender and Intune. As core cyber-security for an SME, keeping just to Microsoft is now a real option. The challenge is understanding the gaps / cyber security service weaknesses (if they exist) in comparison with other vendors such as ESET, Malwarebytes, Trend Micro, etc.
2 out of 4 answers
James OConnor - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 15, 2023
I believe it is a good first step, and I would say even a requirement, but in no way is it a comprehensive security solution, even for endpoints.   There are many things that need to be addressed for security. In addition to this, there is XDR, MDR, more comprehensive AV for endpoints & Servers that stop attacks, Threat Hunting, Mitigation, PEN Testing, Security Training for end users, Multi-Factor Authentication (Microsoft's MFA is good but only for Microsoft products), Patch Management for Endpoints, Servers and Cloud Workloads, Network Access Control, Firewalls for On-Premise and Cloud server workloads, Network Segmentation, Password Management, Data Backups (3-2-1-1 Rule) with Immutable Backups, Power Backups, Physical Security, Monitoring, NOC/SOC services, and working towards a Zero Trust architecture...   But there are no single-point solutions that will make you secure, so don't get complacent. And you can outspend your profits if you do everything. Just remember it's best to have a layered approach that works together and looks at everything from a security perspective and how it integrates with your overall security plans and objectives to help identify holes and possible mitigations. Healthcare must do Risk Assessments by law, but I recommend that all companies of all sizes do at least annual risk assessments since there is so such thing as being too small or inconspicuous to be hit with malware or have a cyber security attack since much of the delivery is automated and not just by the script-kiddies of years gone by... Nation States are actively engaging in cyber warfare daily, along with terrorists, and opportunists looking to make big money from you...
Gaurav Chandola - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 16, 2023
It depends on your company's infrastructure. Check with your cyber team whether you can sync your endpoints to Cloud using Azure AD as Azure Registered/ Azure Hybrid AD join/ Azure AD join, etc.        1. So, if the ask is only to enroll them in Intune to leverage defender/BitLocker services - go directly to Azure AD's join approach.        2. If you still want to manage patch management/mcm BitLocker but Defender via cloud, the approach should be Azure Hybrid AD join.         3. You can still use autopilot using both of these approaches. 
NC
Oct 8, 2023
Oct 8, 2023
To decide which of the two MFA solutions is better, Microsoft Authenticator or Fortinet FortiToken, it may be best to look into their pros and cons: Microsoft Authenticator Pros Reportedly free to use Easy to set up and use, as shared by others Tightly integrated with other Microsoft products Cons May have fewer authentication methods than Fortinet FortiToken May not be as suitable for ent...
See 1 answer
AC
Oct 8, 2023
To decide which of the two MFA solutions is better, Microsoft Authenticator or Fortinet FortiToken, it may be best to look into their pros and cons: Microsoft Authenticator Pros Reportedly free to use Easy to set up and use, as shared by others Tightly integrated with other Microsoft products Cons May have fewer authentication methods than Fortinet FortiToken May not be as suitable for enterprise environments Fortinet FortiToken Pros Reportedly has a broader range of authentication methods than Microsoft Authenticator May be better suited for enterprise environments Has more robust security features, as reported Cons Paid solution based on feedback from others May be more difficult to set up and use May not have tight integration with other Microsoft products Microsoft Authenticator and Fortinet FortiToken are powerful MFA solutions based on feedback from many users, but the best solution for you will depend on your specific needs and requirements.
Product Comparisons
Related Categories
Download Free Report
Download our free Single Sign-On (SSO) Report and find out what your peers are saying about One Identity, Okta, Auth0, and more! Updated: July 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.