What advice do enterprise tech users, such as systems engineers and storage professionals, lend to other IT pros that are either using or researching blade servers?
Advice from Joey Frias, Senior Systems Administrator at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees:
Question: “How has HPE BladeSystem improved your organization?”
Answer:
“The product allowed us to save physical space and energy. Initially, we only bought this product to use Integrity blades. Eventually, we used the vacant slots for HP x86 blades, which we used for vSphere. This decision allowed us to save even more physical space.”
Question: “Have you experienced any scalability issues with HPE BladeSystem?”
Answer:
“In general, I did not encounter any issues with scalability. Though we did run into incompatibility issues with a recent blade purchase that was incompatible with our existing fiber channel ports.”
Advice from Kamel Halabi, Senior Presales Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees:
Question: “What are some of HPE BladeSystem’s valuable features?”
Answer:
“Power and Cooling: It consolidates tremendous power capacity that adapts and optimizes itself, to the most efficient level for any solution. It includes more cooling capacity as well as monitoring and control, that adapt regardless of the performance and density that are thrown at it.”
Question: “What can you advise regarding HPE BladeSystem’s cost and licensing?
Answer:
“The prices for the HPE Virtual Connect Modules are expensive compared to other I/O Modules available. It's better to size the solution accurately and identify which I/O Module is needed for your environment (for example, the HPE FlexFabric or HPE Flex-10).”
Cisco UCS B-Series
Advice from Bob Whitcombe, Technical Sales Architect at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees:
Question: “What do you advise potential or existing users of Cisco UCS B-Series?” Answer:
“At the end of the day, the UCS product requires planning before just jumping in, due to its ability to scale. As a user, you need to evaluate naming conventions, IP addressing models and so forth – think about the entire enterprise as opposed to a single server or rack of servers.
Use very good hardware and innovative network elements, such as the VIC 10Gb cards that allow for traffic sequestration and partitioning across multiple virtual channels in a single link and of course, UCS Manager. Cisco took a network-vs-compute-centric perspective as they embarked on their server designs and, with a clean sheet of paper, evolved a centralized manager for deployment and systems management that enables huge scales in management productivity.”
Advice from a Technical Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees:
Question: Where do you see room for improvement in Cisco UCS B-Series?
Answer:
“Cisco is behind as far as SSD qualifications and options allowed, relative to other vendors, but that is in keeping with their philosophy of a stateless working environment. If I add a unique storage attribute to my blades, I encumber it with a state that requires manual intervention to move around.”
Advice from Brad Fluit, Data Center Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees:
Question: “How has Cisco UCS B-Series improved your organization?”
Answer:
“I have deployed 2-3 dozen UCS systems and managed many more for customers. Customers always love the unified management, speed of setup, and the improved performance after migration of workloads to UCS servers.”
Question: “What do you advise potential or existing users of Cisco UCS B-Series?” Answer:
“Cisco UCS is a fantastic product that is widely deployed with excellent support. Additionally, Cisco has developed CVD’s (Cisco Validated Designs) that assist partners and customers to properly deploy Cisco UCS with most major storage vendors. CVD’s are highly detailed deployment guides which are comprehensively tested by Cisco to ensure quick, highly reliable and predictable deployments.”
Lenovo Blade Servers
Advice from Muhammad Sajid, Sr. System Administrator at a Consumer Goods with 501-1,000 employees:
Question: “What can you advise potential or existing Lenovo Blade Servers users when it comes to initial setup, cost, and licensing?”
Answer:
“Initial hardware setup is bit difficult regarding interconnectivity and the firmware upgrade on the blade chassis and servers. I recommend that it should be done by the IBM tech team...
For servers, proper sizing should be done in terms of processing, memory, storage, etc., along with the IBM team. Sometimes the cost of product increases if it is oversized.”
Advice from Peter Muchiri, System Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees:
Question: “How have Lenovo Blade Servers improved your organization?”
For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because it uses little energy, and it also doesn’t take up a lot of space, which is a huge advantage. Setup is fairly easy and the hardware is easy to manage, which I consider to be a valuable feature. The o...
For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because it uses little energy, and it also doesn’t take up a lot of space, which is a huge advantage. Setup is fairly easy and the hardware is easy to manage, which I consider to be a valuable feature. The only thing I don’t like about Bladesystem is that there is no adaptable support. Other than that, the product is great.
The main benefit of Synergy is the deployment time. With deployment time decreased, there are fewer things to configure, which frees up your time to work on other priorities. However, ultimately I chose HPE’s Bladesystem instead because I didn’t like that with Synergy I would be forced to rely on an external product for firmware updates. For the initial setup of Synergy, training is also needed, whereas Bladesystem provides support
Conclusion
I would choose the product that provides the biggest ROI. In my case that was Bladesystem, which I found to be easy to set up and manage, and provides great support. No matter which solution you ultimately choose, you will want to make sure it is stable, reliable, scalable, and can grow with your organization as needed.
Download our free Blade Servers Report and find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Lenovo, and more! Updated: October 2026.