Veritas Alta Recovery Vault can be improved as it is a seamless tool for integration with infrastructure on-premises because you only need an API communication to send this data locally to reply to the cloud. The single pane of glass means there is no need to deploy complex cloud storage gateways or separate cloud proxy servers. It integrates directly into the core NetBackup engine using MSDP-C. We just need to attach this storage pool, and everything works to send the replication data from on-prem to off-prem. The improvement needed for Veritas Alta Recovery Vault is to simplify multi-cloud redundancy with a single-click policy that handles cross-cloud because natively we can choose one region to replicate this data. This is abstracted from the cloud providers, and I just select in the front-end and create a bucket, while the back end directs me to AWS. I think that the involved cost to choose Azure or another cloud provider is a consideration.
I believe Veritas Alta Recovery Vault can be improved by providing another front view for access, as we face some security insurance problems with only connections through the front-end on Cohesity. I believe providing a report to verify how much data has increased or other types of reports to describe usage better would be beneficial, as we only have the total amount consumed. I want to reiterate that improving the reports is essential, as I do not have anything to verify about the data or types of files ingested, only the total usage amount. Improving the reports is essential, as that feature seems to be missing.
I think Veritas Alta Recovery Vault can be improved by changing their license model and being more flexible. Currently, they are charging us for the size of the backup storage, while some other solutions claim to have unlimited backup storage. The pricing is increasing heavily. Since it is an enterprise solution, it is okay that it should be expensive, but they need to enhance their license model because they are selling only for a minimum of 1,000 Office 365 users. For a small environment, this is not applicable. Additionally, they are providing only 2TB per user, so I need to purchase extra storage since the default storage that comes with the normal user license is not enough. They need to enhance their pricing and licensing model. The issue I face with Veritas Alta Recovery Vault is that if I need to move from their service to other solutions, there is no clear idea about the grace period to migrate the backup data to another solution, and it relies only on the user. This is also one more concern; if I want to go with them and buy their solution, I need to be careful because it feels like a one-way ticket.
AWS Marketplace is a digital catalog that hosts thousands of software listings from independent software vendors. Businesses can find, test, buy, and deploy software in one place, easing the deployment process.AWS Marketplace offers a vast range of third-party software and services for cloud-based enterprises, observable in its streamlined procurement cycle. It delivers extensive options for integration, deployment, and management of applications on the AWS cloud, optimizing agility and...
Veritas Alta Recovery Vault can be improved as it is a seamless tool for integration with infrastructure on-premises because you only need an API communication to send this data locally to reply to the cloud. The single pane of glass means there is no need to deploy complex cloud storage gateways or separate cloud proxy servers. It integrates directly into the core NetBackup engine using MSDP-C. We just need to attach this storage pool, and everything works to send the replication data from on-prem to off-prem. The improvement needed for Veritas Alta Recovery Vault is to simplify multi-cloud redundancy with a single-click policy that handles cross-cloud because natively we can choose one region to replicate this data. This is abstracted from the cloud providers, and I just select in the front-end and create a bucket, while the back end directs me to AWS. I think that the involved cost to choose Azure or another cloud provider is a consideration.
I believe Veritas Alta Recovery Vault can be improved by providing another front view for access, as we face some security insurance problems with only connections through the front-end on Cohesity. I believe providing a report to verify how much data has increased or other types of reports to describe usage better would be beneficial, as we only have the total amount consumed. I want to reiterate that improving the reports is essential, as I do not have anything to verify about the data or types of files ingested, only the total usage amount. Improving the reports is essential, as that feature seems to be missing.
I think Veritas Alta Recovery Vault can be improved by changing their license model and being more flexible. Currently, they are charging us for the size of the backup storage, while some other solutions claim to have unlimited backup storage. The pricing is increasing heavily. Since it is an enterprise solution, it is okay that it should be expensive, but they need to enhance their license model because they are selling only for a minimum of 1,000 Office 365 users. For a small environment, this is not applicable. Additionally, they are providing only 2TB per user, so I need to purchase extra storage since the default storage that comes with the normal user license is not enough. They need to enhance their pricing and licensing model. The issue I face with Veritas Alta Recovery Vault is that if I need to move from their service to other solutions, there is no clear idea about the grace period to migrate the backup data to another solution, and it relies only on the user. This is also one more concern; if I want to go with them and buy their solution, I need to be careful because it feels like a one-way ticket.