I would add that I do not prefer some of the UI choices, especially when I use the LQA feature, because when I finish the translation, the pop-up messages are hiding some important buttons for me, and I often forget to confirm a specific feature, which is problematic for my end client. I would improve Phrase Localization Platform by enhancing the UI so that the most important parts, the buttons, are not hidden behind the pop-up messages. I would also add some more customization features such as colors and a dark mode, for example, changing the QA feature so that I can do it in batches instead of segment by segment because this makes me slower. Additionally, a customization of key binding would be useful. These cover my main concerns about the needed improvements.
I think Phrase Localization Platform could be improved regarding the price for freelancers who are not working with a company that provides this kind of software, as the price is relatively high. Additionally, I would say that sometimes the interface is a bit slow, with small bugs where I have to reload the page to see the updated work.
After using Phrase Localization Platform, I feel that a few improvements could be made, such as creating a more intuitive UI for new users, especially regarding project setup and workflow configuration. Faster performance when handling large translation projects for multiple integrations is required. I also believe improvements in reporting and analytics dashboards with more customizable insights would be beneficial. Additionally, better AI-powered translation suggestions with strong contextual awareness are needed. More flexible role-based permissions, approval workflows, and enhanced in-platform collaboration features such as threaded discussions and review history would be helpful. Improvements in Translation Memory search and duplicate detection are necessary, as well as more guided onboarding tutorials for our enterprise teams. I think that easier troubleshooting for failed syncs and CI/CD integration issues is required, along with more flexible role-based permissions and approval workflows.
I would like Phrase Localization Platform to improve by having the lock segments feature more handy. As a linguist, I sometimes need to forget about the few segments and focus on the rest. I would like to be able to exclude one hundred percent matches from the QA process when I do not have to check those segments. Pulling terms from translation memories would make the workflow smoother. Other improvements needed for Phrase Localization Platform include a ticketing system and improving the quality of response, as it is slow. I would like them to work on that. Phrase Localization Platform integrates with other systems or tools in my organization and is designed to be a lean system, but that means things are clustered in weird groups, and a lot of trial and error is involved in getting the settings. If something goes wrong, the first-level support is very quick and has very fast answers, which are quite typical of the first-level support, essentially asking if you have switched it off and on yet. Anything more involved is challenging for support to address.
I would love to see better filter options in the project tab to improve Phrase Localization Platform. When we have approximately 50 to 100 active projects, it can be hard to find specifics, which is something I have noticed about the needed improvements. I give it a nine because the software offers both offline and online options for translators. It has a very user-friendly interface and is easy to pick up and learn. Also, it is very cost-effective. The reason why I did not give it a perfect score of 10 out of 10 is that I would love to see better filter options in the project tab.
Phrase Localization Platform can be improved by having tags automatically arranged even if not put in order manually.I would suggest that more management features such as translator availability or invoicing are necessary. Phrase Localization Platform needs additional improvements as translators should have access to the source file within the tool.
Learn what your peers think about Phrase Localization Platform. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2026.
Phrase is an enterprise platform automating multilingual content to help organizations improve customer connections and accelerate business growth across global markets.Renowned for language intelligence, Phrase unites translation management, software localization, multimedia localization, machine translation, and language AI in one environment. It simplifies processes from marketing campaigns to apps, ensuring governance, quality control, and brand consistency. Designed for fast-paced...
I would add that I do not prefer some of the UI choices, especially when I use the LQA feature, because when I finish the translation, the pop-up messages are hiding some important buttons for me, and I often forget to confirm a specific feature, which is problematic for my end client. I would improve Phrase Localization Platform by enhancing the UI so that the most important parts, the buttons, are not hidden behind the pop-up messages. I would also add some more customization features such as colors and a dark mode, for example, changing the QA feature so that I can do it in batches instead of segment by segment because this makes me slower. Additionally, a customization of key binding would be useful. These cover my main concerns about the needed improvements.
I think Phrase Localization Platform could be improved regarding the price for freelancers who are not working with a company that provides this kind of software, as the price is relatively high. Additionally, I would say that sometimes the interface is a bit slow, with small bugs where I have to reload the page to see the updated work.
After using Phrase Localization Platform, I feel that a few improvements could be made, such as creating a more intuitive UI for new users, especially regarding project setup and workflow configuration. Faster performance when handling large translation projects for multiple integrations is required. I also believe improvements in reporting and analytics dashboards with more customizable insights would be beneficial. Additionally, better AI-powered translation suggestions with strong contextual awareness are needed. More flexible role-based permissions, approval workflows, and enhanced in-platform collaboration features such as threaded discussions and review history would be helpful. Improvements in Translation Memory search and duplicate detection are necessary, as well as more guided onboarding tutorials for our enterprise teams. I think that easier troubleshooting for failed syncs and CI/CD integration issues is required, along with more flexible role-based permissions and approval workflows.
I would like Phrase Localization Platform to improve by having the lock segments feature more handy. As a linguist, I sometimes need to forget about the few segments and focus on the rest. I would like to be able to exclude one hundred percent matches from the QA process when I do not have to check those segments. Pulling terms from translation memories would make the workflow smoother. Other improvements needed for Phrase Localization Platform include a ticketing system and improving the quality of response, as it is slow. I would like them to work on that. Phrase Localization Platform integrates with other systems or tools in my organization and is designed to be a lean system, but that means things are clustered in weird groups, and a lot of trial and error is involved in getting the settings. If something goes wrong, the first-level support is very quick and has very fast answers, which are quite typical of the first-level support, essentially asking if you have switched it off and on yet. Anything more involved is challenging for support to address.
I would love to see better filter options in the project tab to improve Phrase Localization Platform. When we have approximately 50 to 100 active projects, it can be hard to find specifics, which is something I have noticed about the needed improvements. I give it a nine because the software offers both offline and online options for translators. It has a very user-friendly interface and is easy to pick up and learn. Also, it is very cost-effective. The reason why I did not give it a perfect score of 10 out of 10 is that I would love to see better filter options in the project tab.
Phrase Localization Platform can be improved by having tags automatically arranged even if not put in order manually.I would suggest that more management features such as translator availability or invoicing are necessary. Phrase Localization Platform needs additional improvements as translators should have access to the source file within the tool.