The solution's interface is very slow at times. The interface of the product needs improvement. I wouldn't like to see any improvements in the future since it is an already good product in the present.
From an improvement perspective, I would say that if the deployment environment and IBM Watson Studio's environment are separated, then it would be good. I would like them to be one and offer users a non-separated deployment phase. From an improvement perspective, I want IBM's technical support team to provide more specific answers to queries.
Data Architect at a printing company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 20
2023-06-22T18:30:00Z
Jun 22, 2023
I think maybe the support is an area where it lacks. From my talks with the administrator, I think the support could be improved. My usage of it was limited to Jupyter notebooks.
IT Consultant - Solutions Architect with 51-200 employees
Real User
2020-01-19T06:38:00Z
Jan 19, 2020
I'm not yet familiar enough with the product to talk about improvements but one aspect that comes to mind from what I've seen is that sometimes it's easy to get lost given the number of images the solution opens up when you click on the mouse and the amount of different tabs. It might be easy for someone to lose their way around the system. But no real complaints, so far so good. Previously we had what you call a multiple document interface so that whatever you do, you're still within the same container. You could look at the same kind of environment where you don't have to jump between different windows. You can split a window if you need to get to some other bit of information in the system. You leave your window, and then reference that information on the same window as opposed to jumping to another window. Otherwise, you end up with too many windows and they get cluttered. It becomes hard to navigate around.
Assistant Manager, Technical Engineer at MiRaeTech
Real User
2019-12-12T07:43:00Z
Dec 12, 2019
The product is already really great but for most researchers or a person like me, there are few templates to try something new. So we're limited. Also, I think to make the most of Watson Studio the user interface needs to be improved. For the developer or the engineer, it could be very easy to use but to a person or a text analyzer, they could have some problems using it. So a better user interface could be very helpful
Data Scientist at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
Real User
2019-11-18T07:22:00Z
Nov 18, 2019
When I'm exploring the data and it takes me to another page, when I want to return to my workflow, it returns me to the first step. I'm not sure if this is typical but it was my experience. It would be great to make it easier to explore the data and complete the workflow using the same method. More features in data virtualization would be helpful. The solution could use an interactive dashboard that could make exploration easier.
A data science platform provides the tools and infrastructure for data scientists to build, deploy, and manage machine learning models. These platforms provide a centralized environment for all of the tools and infrastructure that they need to build and deploy machine learning models.
The solution's interface is very slow at times. The interface of the product needs improvement. I wouldn't like to see any improvements in the future since it is an already good product in the present.
From an improvement perspective, I would say that if the deployment environment and IBM Watson Studio's environment are separated, then it would be good. I would like them to be one and offer users a non-separated deployment phase. From an improvement perspective, I want IBM's technical support team to provide more specific answers to queries.
I think maybe the support is an area where it lacks. From my talks with the administrator, I think the support could be improved. My usage of it was limited to Jupyter notebooks.
Watson Studio would be improved with a clearer path for the deployment of docker images.
The initial setup was complex.
I'm not yet familiar enough with the product to talk about improvements but one aspect that comes to mind from what I've seen is that sometimes it's easy to get lost given the number of images the solution opens up when you click on the mouse and the amount of different tabs. It might be easy for someone to lose their way around the system. But no real complaints, so far so good. Previously we had what you call a multiple document interface so that whatever you do, you're still within the same container. You could look at the same kind of environment where you don't have to jump between different windows. You can split a window if you need to get to some other bit of information in the system. You leave your window, and then reference that information on the same window as opposed to jumping to another window. Otherwise, you end up with too many windows and they get cluttered. It becomes hard to navigate around.
Improving it just like the features in Google Dialogflow and Small Talk. If these features were also in IBM Watson Studio that would work for us.
The product is already really great but for most researchers or a person like me, there are few templates to try something new. So we're limited. Also, I think to make the most of Watson Studio the user interface needs to be improved. For the developer or the engineer, it could be very easy to use but to a person or a text analyzer, they could have some problems using it. So a better user interface could be very helpful
When I'm exploring the data and it takes me to another page, when I want to return to my workflow, it returns me to the first step. I'm not sure if this is typical but it was my experience. It would be great to make it easier to explore the data and complete the workflow using the same method. More features in data virtualization would be helpful. The solution could use an interactive dashboard that could make exploration easier.