Cisco Compute Hyperconverged is good already, but something that still has potential to improve would be the performance. Performance-wise it is good, but the negative aspect is the troubleshooting, as it takes too much time to resolve issues.
Field Force Engineer at a comms service provider with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Top 10
Sep 26, 2026
Cisco Compute Hyperconverged can be improved by addressing the learning curve and being open to more open-source software, such as Proxmox, specifically allowing use with Proxmox or even just basic Debian, rather than relying on VMware. There seems to be a lot of aftermarket hardware on sale on eBay or other platforms, making it possible for persons preparing for their CCMP Data Center to buy this equipment, but hosting it on VMware may be a bit pricey, especially now with the whole Broadcom situation, so it should probably be able to open it and allow installation of Proxmox.
Sr. Manager Network Operation & Deployment Working with Airtel India at Airtel
Real User
Top 5
Dec 5, 2025
I see that the hardware side and performance concerns are prevalent, even in Cisco hardware used in the card platform. We have observed the same issues with Cisco Compute Hyperconverged platforms as well, indicating a performance issue. Regarding the stability rating, it should be around seven because the support from Cisco is nice, but the performance of the product does not meet our preferences. For additional features to enhance competitiveness, Cisco needs to improve their hardware utilization performance specifically. There is a significant gap between the throughput they recommend and what commercial enterprises experience, which is around a thirty percent gap. If we talk about Red Hat or other external platforms, in that scenario, it is better for enterprises that want a complete support package to go with Cisco. However, if the enterprise has the capability to maintain in-house, it may be better to consider different hyperscalers. Another concern with Cisco is that they are trying to bind customers to specific hardware.
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Compute Hyperconverged. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2026.
Cisco Compute Hyperconverged enhances efficiency, reliability, and performance through integrated networking, centralized management, and scalable infrastructure, making it ideal for virtualization, data protection, and automation.Cisco Compute Hyperconverged provides a comprehensive platform for managing virtual environments, offering advanced features like integrated networking and centralized management. With support for virtualization, data protection, and automation, it ensures high...
Cisco Compute Hyperconverged is good already, but something that still has potential to improve would be the performance. Performance-wise it is good, but the negative aspect is the troubleshooting, as it takes too much time to resolve issues.
Cisco Compute Hyperconverged can be improved by addressing the learning curve and being open to more open-source software, such as Proxmox, specifically allowing use with Proxmox or even just basic Debian, rather than relying on VMware. There seems to be a lot of aftermarket hardware on sale on eBay or other platforms, making it possible for persons preparing for their CCMP Data Center to buy this equipment, but hosting it on VMware may be a bit pricey, especially now with the whole Broadcom situation, so it should probably be able to open it and allow installation of Proxmox.
I see that the hardware side and performance concerns are prevalent, even in Cisco hardware used in the card platform. We have observed the same issues with Cisco Compute Hyperconverged platforms as well, indicating a performance issue. Regarding the stability rating, it should be around seven because the support from Cisco is nice, but the performance of the product does not meet our preferences. For additional features to enhance competitiveness, Cisco needs to improve their hardware utilization performance specifically. There is a significant gap between the throughput they recommend and what commercial enterprises experience, which is around a thirty percent gap. If we talk about Red Hat or other external platforms, in that scenario, it is better for enterprises that want a complete support package to go with Cisco. However, if the enterprise has the capability to maintain in-house, it may be better to consider different hyperscalers. Another concern with Cisco is that they are trying to bind customers to specific hardware.