Digital solutions architect at a educational organization with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 5
Oct 6, 2026
My main use case for Reco is that it has been a valuable part of our security and SaaS visibility stack. Over time, I have found its main value to be giving us better visibility into our SaaS environment and helping identify areas that require attention. Reco is relatively straightforward to work with, and its centralized view makes it easier to investigate issues compared with checking individual applications manually. A specific example of how I used Reco to solve a problem and improve my workflow is when we were trying to understand an unfamiliar SaaS application in our environment. Instead of manually going through different systems to figure out who is using it and whether it needs attention, Reco gives a centralized place to start that investigation, which saves quite a bit of time, especially when dealing with a growing number of applications. For me, it is primarily the visibility that matters. I think another benefit is the context around the visibility because it helps us decide which findings actually need attention, rather than treating everything the same.
Gerente De Arquitectura De Ciberseguridad at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Top 5
Jul 17, 2026
I implemented Reco for cybersecurity posture management for SaaS applications, and also for AI agents posture, so SaaS security posture management and agent posture management. I am using Reco for detecting attacks and generating alerts on bad behavior in SaaS applications, not only posture. I am using the eight different sensors for SaaS application discovery in my environment, and it works well. To be honest, I am not using that in depth, the discovery module; I know the SaaS applications that I have and I integrate them directly. I see that it's discovering applications through these sensors, and I am using the email one, which works well; it checks on the emails and sees if someone is using a SaaS application. But besides that one, I am not using the other sensors. That sensor is working well, but I am not, let's say, taking advantage of that module yet, the discovery module. My impression of Reco's AI Agent Security features ability to discover and govern connected AI agents is that it works well; I am using that for my agents on Copilot Studio. I integrate Reco with Copilot Studio, and it's showing me the agents, the inventory of agents, and the posture of those agents. It's working well, but the only problem was with the integration with Copilot Studio because there was a centralized integration; I have to integrate with each environment in Copilot Studio, so it's not easy to integrate because I have to go one by one, one agent per agent. But once I am integrated, it's very good; it shows good information and posture risks on those agents, so it's working well. I am aware of the pricing aspect of Reco. I am not using Reco's agents for automating tasks in my business processes. I do not use the device management feature in Reco.
Secure the ecosystem. Enable the agents.
Reco gives security teams the context and control to govern autonomous AI activity without disrupting business operations
Reco secures AI agents and their operating environments where applications, identities, permissions, and workflows intersect. Every agent your business deploys enters a growing ecosystem it can expand autonomously. Reco maps that ecosystem, reveals what agents can reach, and detects when something deviates from policy before it...
My main use case for Reco is that it has been a valuable part of our security and SaaS visibility stack. Over time, I have found its main value to be giving us better visibility into our SaaS environment and helping identify areas that require attention. Reco is relatively straightforward to work with, and its centralized view makes it easier to investigate issues compared with checking individual applications manually. A specific example of how I used Reco to solve a problem and improve my workflow is when we were trying to understand an unfamiliar SaaS application in our environment. Instead of manually going through different systems to figure out who is using it and whether it needs attention, Reco gives a centralized place to start that investigation, which saves quite a bit of time, especially when dealing with a growing number of applications. For me, it is primarily the visibility that matters. I think another benefit is the context around the visibility because it helps us decide which findings actually need attention, rather than treating everything the same.
I implemented Reco for cybersecurity posture management for SaaS applications, and also for AI agents posture, so SaaS security posture management and agent posture management. I am using Reco for detecting attacks and generating alerts on bad behavior in SaaS applications, not only posture. I am using the eight different sensors for SaaS application discovery in my environment, and it works well. To be honest, I am not using that in depth, the discovery module; I know the SaaS applications that I have and I integrate them directly. I see that it's discovering applications through these sensors, and I am using the email one, which works well; it checks on the emails and sees if someone is using a SaaS application. But besides that one, I am not using the other sensors. That sensor is working well, but I am not, let's say, taking advantage of that module yet, the discovery module. My impression of Reco's AI Agent Security features ability to discover and govern connected AI agents is that it works well; I am using that for my agents on Copilot Studio. I integrate Reco with Copilot Studio, and it's showing me the agents, the inventory of agents, and the posture of those agents. It's working well, but the only problem was with the integration with Copilot Studio because there was a centralized integration; I have to integrate with each environment in Copilot Studio, so it's not easy to integrate because I have to go one by one, one agent per agent. But once I am integrated, it's very good; it shows good information and posture risks on those agents, so it's working well. I am aware of the pricing aspect of Reco. I am not using Reco's agents for automating tasks in my business processes. I do not use the device management feature in Reco.