Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform comes with a high price point. Even though we use the platform, we need additional dashboarding tools because the complete infrastructure as code dashboard capability is missing. Red Hat introduced a new product called Red Hat Developer Hub for platform engineering. While Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is very good for automation, deserving an 8 out of 10 rating, the cost of combining Red Hat Developer Hub and Ansible is extremely high, which presents a significant challenge with the Red Hat product.
I know Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform costs money since I am using a trial license. The pricing is high, and since I'm not using all functionalities, it would be better if the price depended on the functionalities used.
System Administrator at a university with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
May 8, 2024
Everything is generally fair. No one ever likes to pay a lot of money, but we are getting the value. We also get support with it. It has been fair and worthwhile.
Learn what your peers think about Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2025.
It is an open source product but needs a license subscription to use it. The price depends on the number of nodes supported by the platform (the nodes correspond to a host which can be for example a VM or a data center). The price is really different depending on the customer's needs.
You don't need to buy agents on servers or deploy expense management when using the solution, which affected our decision to go with it. We also bought this solution because it was better than some competitors, like Puppet and Chef, and because of the automation. It has helped our organization save time when it comes to service deployment, moves, and updates. We used to have 120 employees, and now we have just 25 for the same amount of activities.
Linux Platform System Administrator at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Feb 2, 2021
We have tested out Ansible Tower, but there is a budget issue, so that is in our next phase. Red Hat's open source approach was a factor when choosing Ansible, since the solution is free as of right now.
It's opensource so it's free. But, not free as in beer. The most important cost here is the learning curve. Small targets like local user management (backup/monitoring) or monitoring configuration management (Syslog/SNMP) are some of the easiest and low-risk ones can learn from. The OPEX gain is high, though. So, the ROI is definitely there. For the UI, you might want to pay for Ansible Tower. But, there's also the opensource upstream project, AWX.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform streamlines IT operations with features like a simplified GUI and extensive module support. Its agentless architecture and YAML ease make it an adaptable choice for managing diverse infrastructures efficiently.Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a robust automation framework that supports multiple environments and integrates well with various applications. Its agentless Python-based architecture facilitates efficient server management and rapid...
For enterprise users of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, there are fees, but it is free and open-source for testing or small labs.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform comes with a high price point. Even though we use the platform, we need additional dashboarding tools because the complete infrastructure as code dashboard capability is missing. Red Hat introduced a new product called Red Hat Developer Hub for platform engineering. While Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is very good for automation, deserving an 8 out of 10 rating, the cost of combining Red Hat Developer Hub and Ansible is extremely high, which presents a significant challenge with the Red Hat product.
I know Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform costs money since I am using a trial license. The pricing is high, and since I'm not using all functionalities, it would be better if the price depended on the functionalities used.
There is a pricing associated with Ansible, however, I find it reasonable.
There is a need for more flexibility in the subscription model, but I do not have detailed insights into the pricing and licensing setup.
Everything is generally fair. No one ever likes to pay a lot of money, but we are getting the value. We also get support with it. It has been fair and worthwhile.
Ansible Tower is pretty expensive.
It’s an open-source tool.
Customers need to pay yearly for the license. The pricing is acceptable. It is not expensive.
Users have to pay a per-node cost of around $ 100 per node. The solution's pricing depends upon the volume.
It is an open source product but needs a license subscription to use it. The price depends on the number of nodes supported by the platform (the nodes correspond to a host which can be for example a VM or a data center). The price is really different depending on the customer's needs.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is an expensive solution. There may be additional fees to use advanced features.
I am using the community edition of the solution which is free.
The solution is inexpensive compared to other products.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is an affordable solution. Infrastructure maintenance of the Master server comes at a cost.
The pricing is pretty standard.
I believe the cost per node basis is around $125 per node.
The cost is determined by the number of endpoints. A license is required, if you are using Tower, we don't use it very often.
You don't need to buy agents on servers or deploy expense management when using the solution, which affected our decision to go with it. We also bought this solution because it was better than some competitors, like Puppet and Chef, and because of the automation. It has helped our organization save time when it comes to service deployment, moves, and updates. We used to have 120 employees, and now we have just 25 for the same amount of activities.
We're not paying for it, but if you were to buy it, you would get Ansible Tower. That is what they are charging for, if I recall correctly.
If you only need to use Ansible, it's free for any end-user, but when you require Ansible Tower, you need to pay per Ansible Tower server.
We have tested out Ansible Tower, but there is a budget issue, so that is in our next phase. Red Hat's open source approach was a factor when choosing Ansible, since the solution is free as of right now.
It's opensource so it's free. But, not free as in beer. The most important cost here is the learning curve. Small targets like local user management (backup/monitoring) or monitoring configuration management (Syslog/SNMP) are some of the easiest and low-risk ones can learn from. The OPEX gain is high, though. So, the ROI is definitely there. For the UI, you might want to pay for Ansible Tower. But, there's also the opensource upstream project, AWX.
Ansible Tower is free. Until they lower the cost, we are holding off on purchasing the product.
We went with product because we have a subscription for Red Hat.