I am not much aware of the pricing of NetApp ASA, but I estimate a NetApp ASA system could cost several hundreds of thousand euros or pounds or dollars.
It's more expensive than other storage vendors such as Dell, Pure Storage, HPE, Lenovo, etc. It provides the value, but some of the customers don't look at the value. They first look at the cost. It should be reduced by 20% to 30%. That's the difference I'm noticing.
Senior Client Solutions Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 10
Sep 27, 2024
It is pretty good. It is definitely cheaper than Dell EMC. It is cheaper than Pure. It is cheaper than VAST. It is definitely cheaper than HPE. The only one that is on par with NetApp's pricing for enterprise customers is IBM. IBM is good, but unfortunately, there are not as many trained people out there. It is harder to support. Most of the IBM storage people are on the IBM mainframe. As a Windows-based and Linux-based shop, not a mainframe shop, it made more sense for us to go with NetApp.
NetApp ASA is recognized for its SAN-centric architecture and robust SAN storage, providing consistent low latency and reliable solutions for mission-critical applications, virtualization, and block storage.Focused on enhancing data availability and management, NetApp ASA utilizes ONTAP 9 and NVMe disks for efficient storage solutions. Its functionality extends to supporting mission-critical applications, VMware infrastructures, Microsoft Hyper-V, disaster recovery, and business continuity....
I am not much aware of the pricing of NetApp ASA, but I estimate a NetApp ASA system could cost several hundreds of thousand euros or pounds or dollars.
It's more expensive than other storage vendors such as Dell, Pure Storage, HPE, Lenovo, etc. It provides the value, but some of the customers don't look at the value. They first look at the cost. It should be reduced by 20% to 30%. That's the difference I'm noticing.
It is pretty good. It is definitely cheaper than Dell EMC. It is cheaper than Pure. It is cheaper than VAST. It is definitely cheaper than HPE. The only one that is on par with NetApp's pricing for enterprise customers is IBM. IBM is good, but unfortunately, there are not as many trained people out there. It is harder to support. Most of the IBM storage people are on the IBM mainframe. As a Windows-based and Linux-based shop, not a mainframe shop, it made more sense for us to go with NetApp.