Senior Solution Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
Jul 1, 2024
The pricing is a little expensive. It has a pricing model of, like $50 per developer that commits into the repository. So, if you have a large development team with many people committing to the repository, it could easily be 20 to 30 people. Multiply that by $50 per month, and it's already $1000 a month, just for this tool. In my opinion, it's a little expensive. I find it a little overpriced. It can easily cost $10,000 to $12,000 dollars a year, which is a bit much for a software company. There is room for improvement in the price. The price could be lower.
Technical Program Manager at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Nov 6, 2023
The current licensing model, which relies on active commitments, poses challenges, particularly in predicting and managing growth. This model requires constant adjustments and additional licensing requests, making it difficult to estimate usage from the start. A pay-per-use model, where charges align with actual usage, would be more ideal and flexible.
GitHub Advanced Security secures data by scanning for vulnerabilities in dependencies, secret scanning, and protecting sensitive information. It integrates seamlessly, reducing reliance on multiple tools and optimizing vulnerability detection.GitHub Advanced Security is designed to enhance security awareness by offering comprehensive tools for secret scanning, code analysis, and SCSS dependency checks. AI-driven features deliver accurate security insights while minimizing false positives. It...
I think the pricing of this tool is good.
The pricing for GitHub Advanced Security is quite high, especially compared to other solutions.
The pricing is a little expensive. It has a pricing model of, like $50 per developer that commits into the repository. So, if you have a large development team with many people committing to the repository, it could easily be 20 to 30 people. Multiply that by $50 per month, and it's already $1000 a month, just for this tool. In my opinion, it's a little expensive. I find it a little overpriced. It can easily cost $10,000 to $12,000 dollars a year, which is a bit much for a software company. There is room for improvement in the price. The price could be lower.
The solution is expensive.
The current licensing model, which relies on active commitments, poses challenges, particularly in predicting and managing growth. This model requires constant adjustments and additional licensing requests, making it difficult to estimate usage from the start. A pay-per-use model, where charges align with actual usage, would be more ideal and flexible.