Experience Technocrat driving IT initiatives at WISDOMBOWL
User
Top 10
Dec 3, 2024
Alteryx is expensive. It's beyond the budget of freelancers like me, even though companies usually purchase it for larger projects. There should be a desktop version available at a lower cost for freelancers.
Legal Coordinator at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
Nov 27, 2024
The pricing seems high for my current needs. However, considering the benefits, it is easier to justify to management for broader company usage. It has a fair price when considering a larger-scale implementation.
The product pricing is a concern. I use Alteryx because my company provides it, but it would be too expensive if I had to pay for it myself. Many customers also feel it is too costly, especially in regions like Brazil. While it offers extensive features, including predictive analytics, for those who mainly use it for data preparation and blending, the cost can be prohibitive.
In my opinion, it's actually quite expensive. I frequently encounter numerous students who approach me, seeking the appropriate path to undertake. I assist them in learning tools of this nature, which can equip them for extensive data manipulation tasks since they exhibit keen interest. They are very interested in learning how to use Alteryx, but the license price is too high for most students, especially in India, where I'm from. For business licenses, I don't really care because my organization is already paying for them. They get a subsidized rate because they have also purchased licenses for other products from Alteryx. I think if Alteryx could reduce the price of licenses for students and other younger professionals, it would help them a lot. These are the people who will promote Alteryx's solutions to others. Take me, for example. I used Alteryx in my previous company. Now I work for a different company in the US. When I first started at my new company, my team was not convinced that we needed an ETL tool. But I was able to convince them to give Alteryx a try because I had experience with it and I knew how it could benefit our company. If Alteryx could provide licenses to younger professionals at a cheaper price, it would help them learn about Alteryx and its capabilities. This would lead to more people using Alteryx, which would benefit Alteryx in the long run.
We use the free version of the solution. There are enterprise licenses available. It cost approximately $5,000 annually. It is an expensive solution and there are additional features that cost more money.
Solutions Sales and Design at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Jun 6, 2022
The designer version has a list price of $5,995 USD. The server version is even more expensive because it is only for collaboration. The designer license is needed to access the servers for collaboration, which in my opinion is expensive.
The price could be better. Though we are satisfied with the solution, we feel the price to be a bit on the expensive side. We make use of another ETL solution, the PowerCenter. We would like to improve on and escalate Alteryx, but find it too expensive at the moment to do so. The licensing costs are around 26,000 reals, perhaps $6,500 a year. The licensing is all inclusive. There are no further costs.
Data Analytics Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
MSP
Nov 16, 2021
Since we're partners, we get licenses. That said, from the feedback I hear, the price is a little bit more on the expensive side. We do yearly subscriptions. There are machine learning suites that do come at an extra cost as well.
Director at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
May 12, 2021
The licensing model that they use makes it a very expensive proposition for many companies. It requires buying a server, as it is only on-premises. In order to have designers, and, if you want to collaborate, you have to buy a server. If the designer is $5,000, and if you want a server, you have to pay $80,000.
Senior Capacity Planner at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
Apr 23, 2021
It's more expensive than Tableau, for example. There has been some scrutiny on the overall costs. We're trying to go to more open-source, with more products that don't cost so much. I have to continually work with folks on proving that the value of what we pay in licenses. The solution has recently changed its support process and is now pressuring users to pay for a higher level of support services. That could potentially be an extra charge for some companies.
Its price should be lower. The key thing that we see is that talking about ROI is an important element at the time of purchase. Cost becomes a factor in every discussion. Justifying the ROI for these kinds of workflows is always a challenge, and the only way to counter the challenge is by addressing the pricing.
Senior Data Architect, Total Rewards Analytics and Insights at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Jan 26, 2021
I don't handle the licensing aspect of the product. I can say that we have to have an enterprise license. Currently and periodically that gets challenged and they try to take it away and we honestly have a hard time finding a tool that could replace it. Therefore, we wind up keeping it. It's happened several times.
Solutions Consultant at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Consultant
Jul 5, 2020
I don't have any idea how much the solution costs. I don't deal with that aspect of the solution. I do believe the pricing is publicly listed on their website.
Technology Sales & Cybersecurity Professional at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
MSP
Dec 23, 2019
We have a yearly cost that we pay for the licensing. We do not pay any costs in addition to the licensing fees. The technical support is included as part of the fees that we pay.
Our approximate cost as we understand from the company is that the total is $5,000 per user per year for the desktop production license. So, for us and the ten licenses we need, that means the production license would be around $50,000 per year. That might not be the exact number, but I think it is close enough to be correct. With that, there are not any additional costs. Probably you can pay for support and for training if you want something like a dedicated workshop. That might cost more as an add-on but there is no additional cost for using the tool itself.
It is a little bit pricey. The desktop version is cheaper, it is on a one year license. And, if you want to do anything on an enterprise name it is quite expensive. The current pricing model may get to be too much in three to four years time.
Opt for the three year subscription. It is 20% less than the yearly one. It is $4,000 a year, so it is cheap versus other solutions. It also accomplishes three times the volume on the job in the same time (as the other solutions).
Alteryx can be used to speed up or automate your business processes and enables geospatial and predictive solutions. Its platform helps organizations answer business questions quickly and efficiently, and can be used as a major building block in a digital transformation or automation initiative. With Alteryx, you can build processes in a more efficient, repeatable, and less error-prone way. Unlike other tools, Alteryx is easy to use without an IT background. The platform is very robust and...
Alteryx is affordable.
Alteryx is expensive. It's beyond the budget of freelancers like me, even though companies usually purchase it for larger projects. There should be a desktop version available at a lower cost for freelancers.
The pricing seems high for my current needs. However, considering the benefits, it is easier to justify to management for broader company usage. It has a fair price when considering a larger-scale implementation.
Alteryx is more cost-effective compared to Informatica licenses, offering savings.
Alteryx is generally more suited for medium—to large companies due to its potentially high licensing costs.
The product pricing is a concern. I use Alteryx because my company provides it, but it would be too expensive if I had to pay for it myself. Many customers also feel it is too costly, especially in regions like Brazil. While it offers extensive features, including predictive analytics, for those who mainly use it for data preparation and blending, the cost can be prohibitive.
I rate the tool's pricing a two out of ten.
Alteryx is an expensive solution.
In my opinion, it's actually quite expensive. I frequently encounter numerous students who approach me, seeking the appropriate path to undertake. I assist them in learning tools of this nature, which can equip them for extensive data manipulation tasks since they exhibit keen interest. They are very interested in learning how to use Alteryx, but the license price is too high for most students, especially in India, where I'm from. For business licenses, I don't really care because my organization is already paying for them. They get a subsidized rate because they have also purchased licenses for other products from Alteryx. I think if Alteryx could reduce the price of licenses for students and other younger professionals, it would help them a lot. These are the people who will promote Alteryx's solutions to others. Take me, for example. I used Alteryx in my previous company. Now I work for a different company in the US. When I first started at my new company, my team was not convinced that we needed an ETL tool. But I was able to convince them to give Alteryx a try because I had experience with it and I knew how it could benefit our company. If Alteryx could provide licenses to younger professionals at a cheaper price, it would help them learn about Alteryx and its capabilities. This would lead to more people using Alteryx, which would benefit Alteryx in the long run.
We use the free version of the solution. There are enterprise licenses available. It cost approximately $5,000 annually. It is an expensive solution and there are additional features that cost more money.
The solution has a more costly license than other tools in the market.
The designer license costs 5000 euros. The server edition is 1000 euros.
I rate the solution's pricing as a ten, as it is highly priced.
The pricing is reasonable; however, if you need a lot of licenses, it will get expensive.
It's very expensive. I'd rate it a four out of ten in terms of the price. It's great for big companies but not for small companies.
It has a good price.
I don't deal with licensing. I can't speak to the exact cost of the solution.
The designer version has a list price of $5,995 USD. The server version is even more expensive because it is only for collaboration. The designer license is needed to access the servers for collaboration, which in my opinion is expensive.
I can't speak about the specifics of our licensing. Our operating costs are all shared and allocated. That helps keep the cost down.
The price could be better. Though we are satisfied with the solution, we feel the price to be a bit on the expensive side. We make use of another ETL solution, the PowerCenter. We would like to improve on and escalate Alteryx, but find it too expensive at the moment to do so. The licensing costs are around 26,000 reals, perhaps $6,500 a year. The licensing is all inclusive. There are no further costs.
The cost of the solution could be reduced.
Since we're partners, we get licenses. That said, from the feedback I hear, the price is a little bit more on the expensive side. We do yearly subscriptions. There are machine learning suites that do come at an extra cost as well.
The licensing model that they use makes it a very expensive proposition for many companies. It requires buying a server, as it is only on-premises. In order to have designers, and, if you want to collaborate, you have to buy a server. If the designer is $5,000, and if you want a server, you have to pay $80,000.
It's more expensive than Tableau, for example. There has been some scrutiny on the overall costs. We're trying to go to more open-source, with more products that don't cost so much. I have to continually work with folks on proving that the value of what we pay in licenses. The solution has recently changed its support process and is now pressuring users to pay for a higher level of support services. That could potentially be an extra charge for some companies.
Its price should be lower. The key thing that we see is that talking about ROI is an important element at the time of purchase. Cost becomes a factor in every discussion. Justifying the ROI for these kinds of workflows is always a challenge, and the only way to counter the challenge is by addressing the pricing.
I don't handle the licensing aspect of the product. I can say that we have to have an enterprise license. Currently and periodically that gets challenged and they try to take it away and we honestly have a hard time finding a tool that could replace it. Therefore, we wind up keeping it. It's happened several times.
The license is really expensive, we cannot afford to have two or three. It takes away all the budget of my area.
I don't know much about the licensing, but there are some additional costs for certain features.
I'm not sure of the exact cost of the solution. It's not an aspect of the product I deal with directly.
The price for Alteryx Designer is reasonable but the price of the Alteryx Server for universal collaborations is too expensive.
I don't have any idea how much the solution costs. I don't deal with that aspect of the solution. I do believe the pricing is publicly listed on their website.
The pricing of the solution is a bit on the expensive side. We use an Alteryx Server and Designer as well. The server itself is a bit pricey.
There are some implementation services and internal effort costs at the beginning but there is nothing else.
The server pricing is high.
We have a yearly cost that we pay for the licensing. We do not pay any costs in addition to the licensing fees. The technical support is included as part of the fees that we pay.
Our approximate cost as we understand from the company is that the total is $5,000 per user per year for the desktop production license. So, for us and the ten licenses we need, that means the production license would be around $50,000 per year. That might not be the exact number, but I think it is close enough to be correct. With that, there are not any additional costs. Probably you can pay for support and for training if you want something like a dedicated workshop. That might cost more as an add-on but there is no additional cost for using the tool itself.
It is a little bit pricey. The desktop version is cheaper, it is on a one year license. And, if you want to do anything on an enterprise name it is quite expensive. The current pricing model may get to be too much in three to four years time.
Opt for the three year subscription. It is 20% less than the yearly one. It is $4,000 a year, so it is cheap versus other solutions. It also accomplishes three times the volume on the job in the same time (as the other solutions).