I'm not sure that it's significantly impacted our training costs. We use it, but not specifically for training purposes. We did not notice any changes in application coverage percentages since implementing ThreatModeler since we already had 100% coverage with our applications. We're just more efficient now. I would recommend ThreatModeler Platform to other users, as it scales and it's the best one that I've seen out there. It just seems the tool that suits the needs of what people who are threat modeling want. I would rate ThreatModeler Platform an eight out of ten.
We aren't using the governance part yet. I need to look at that more and incorporate that. We aren't using it yet, but it's a good feature. I'd like to find a way to use it. Right now, we're doing governance outside of the tool using other platforms. Maybe we can do it more inside the tool. I would rate ThreatModeler Platform an eight out of ten.
I'm not sure that it's significantly impacted our training costs. We use it, but not specifically for training purposes. We did not notice any changes in application coverage percentages since implementing ThreatModeler since we already had 100% coverage with our applications. We're just more efficient now. I would recommend ThreatModeler Platform to other users, as it scales and it's the best one that I've seen out there. It just seems the tool that suits the needs of what people who are threat modeling want. I would rate ThreatModeler Platform an eight out of ten.
We aren't using the governance part yet. I need to look at that more and incorporate that. We aren't using it yet, but it's a good feature. I'd like to find a way to use it. Right now, we're doing governance outside of the tool using other platforms. Maybe we can do it more inside the tool. I would rate ThreatModeler Platform an eight out of ten.