What advice do you have for others considering Tenable.sc?

It is very difficult to manage internal servers from the server team. You should go for the cloud if you want to manage any extra hardware or VM. We were able to integrate with other security solutions, like SIEM, and activate monitoring. There were no challenges in integrating it. However, it doesn't support all types of SIEMs except major SIEMs like IBM QRadar and Splunk. I recommend first configuring your alert monitoring system and doing the configuration with the advice of OEM support staff. It's very easy to use. If you want to compare it with other solutions, you can use the beta version or demo version, and you will be confident and strong and use it happily and without any pain. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

I rate Tenable Security Center a five out of ten.

I would rate the product a nine out of ten. I would advise to focus on partner relationship development and enablement. If your partner is not confident enough or they are not getting training or direct channel attachments, then it becomes difficult for System Integrator professionals.

The product helps with web application security. I advise others to use Tenable IO and NAS, especially in regions with specific data protection regulations like GDPR and PDPA. I rate it a nine out of ten.

We are satisfied with the solution. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

Two or three engineers in my company are involved in the maintenance of the solution. I recommend the solution to those planning to use it. I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.

I would suggest running a proof of concept to evaluate the product's suitability. Test it on a smaller scale over a period of one to two months to see how it works. It's essential to assess whether the solution aligns with the organization's specific needs. Our approach involves using agent-based scanning, but this varies based on individual requirements. Be aware of the network "noise" it might produce. Default scanning intensity might be too much and you might need to alter it in order to prevent network problems (DoS yourself). My advice would be to give it a trial run before committing. It's hard to tell if it fits without firsthand experience. Additionally, the fact that Nessus, the scanning component of the security center, has been around for decades and even had open-source iterations in the early 2000s provides some confidence in its longevity and reliability. However, for newcomers, I would recommend testing it out on a smaller scale before making a decision. Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten.

I am dealing with the latest version of the solution. It's a very good product to use. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

My recommendation is to stick with the data scanning tool and not worry about downloading the other features. I rate this solution nine out of 10.

I would rate the tool an eight out of ten. The tool has community support. From my experience of using the solution, I would recommend it to anyone looking to use it.

I rate Tenable.sc seven out of 10. I typically recommend Tenable.io instead, but Tenable.sc is an option if data regulations require you to use a private cloud or on-prem infrastructure.

I would give Tenable.sc a rating of eight out of ten.

We sell Tenable. I'm using something around version five. I have installed the demo version of it in my Docker. The product really stands out in comparison to the competition. However, the price tag is a bit on the higher. I would advise new users to scan all assets and grab the results and set up all security postures and do stats for mitigating those attacks which are critical. For the first time, I would recommend they go for the critical and high vulnerabilities first in order to mitigate effectively very early on. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

For anyone considering implementing Tenable.sc into their organization, I would recommend that they have the proper design of the solution and the proper placement of the scanners before implementing the solution. Tenable is a good product, I have no concerns with it as a solution. I rate this product a nine out of ten overall.

I would rate Tenable eight out of ten.

I would give the product an overall rating of nine out of 10. The product is a very good solution. I would advise potential users to look at other solutions. The product is our second solution, and we are happy that it meets our requirements.

The rule is always garbage in, garbage out. Be sure to configure the solution well and take advantage of technical support to understand how things should work. Mistakes are made when people assume they know how to do things. I believe in using technical support to confirm the process and ensure everything is done correctly. I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

I rate Tenable.sc nine out of ten.

I would recommend this solution to others. I rate Tenable SC an eight out of ten.

Tenable SC is suitable for medium and large companies, but it's not feasible for small ones. If you're in the US, I advise buying services from Tenable to implement the system instead of trying to implement it yourself. There are always some tricks that come with knowledge of the product that will make for a faster and better installation. Similarly, if you're in EMEA or Asia, please choose a good integrator. I would give Tenable SC a rating of nine out of ten.

I like this tool a lot but I work in the security area, so my concerns are always about security and how we can increase the security of everything that we have. It's important to be cautious about who gets access to what. I rate this solution eight out of 10.

I rate Tenable SC nine out of 10. It needs some improvements in the reporting engine and training. For example, I need the ability to easily check what happened on Tenable specific dates.

I rate Tenable SC an eight out of ten.

I would rate the solution as a nine out of ten.

This is a good solution for what I use it for. I would recommend it to others. I rate Tenable SC a seven out of ten.

I would say there are approximately 30 users in our organization using the Tenable SC product.

It has been good so far. I would rate it an eight out of 10.

I would rate it a seven out of ten.

Tenable SC is without a doubt a good choice. I would rate Tenable SC a nine out of ten.

The size of our customers run the gamut, from small medium to large, in certain cases exceeding 5,000 IPs. I would definitely recommend the solution. I rate Tenable SC as an eight-plus out of ten.

It is a much better solution than other competitors. It provides almost everything that is required in terms of vulnerability management. If you are looking for overall enterprise security in terms of integrations and vulnerability management, you should go for Tenable SC or Tenable SCCV. I would rate Tenable SC a nine out of ten.

We are just customers and end-users of the product. If a company does decide to implement the solution, I'd advise working with Tenable engineers during the process, and even afterward, in order to ensure everything is set up appropriately. I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten We've had a largely very positive experience with the solution so far.

I can easily recommend Tenable SecurityCenter, and I have nothing really bad to say about it. I think it's a great tool for what it does. I enjoy the webinars, and the people that run the company seem very engaged with what's going on when you're into current events and the overall security climate, and they're continuously looking to improve. I can't speak to every option that they have, but I have no reservations recommending them. I would rate Tenable SecurityCenter an eight out of ten.