Installation and deployment are easy. However, upgrading from one version to another can be challenging when clients are promised minus two upgrades. Cloud upgrades may become difficult, requiring on-site visits, and previous configurations might be lost during upgrades. The solution is easy to maintain. At the time of installation, there were no AI-related features, and I do not think AI is required for this solution. I rate Tenable OT Security a six out of ten.
Intrusion detection, configuration change detection, and inventory are the most compelling features for monitoring the OT environment. The main benefit is that it discovers vulnerabilities in the environment and network elements, such as switches, firewalls, and Windows and Linux servers. They have to look for a tool that covers the whole plant and can be integrated into the rest of the company's security systems. It reduces the risk of the ping attack and uncovers the vulnerabilities and misconfigurations present in the cell network. It's built in several parts. One is vulnerabilities, and the other is analyzing the attack path. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten. I recommend it. If clients need a solution for both IT and OT, I recommend Tenable OT Security. I suggest proceeding with Tenable OT Security if the client is small and needs IT and OT. However, I'll recommend Claroty Platform if the plant size is large and they need a more rigorous and detailed solution, including deep packet inspection.
I would suggest before implementing it, do your research. Before opting for OT Security, how the infrastructure and the information system security are strong enough? And after that, go for OT Security part of it because all are linked. And the information security is the basic part of it. If that is not properly implemented, then OT Security implementation and management will be a difficult task for them. Overall, I would rate Tenable OT Security a seven out of ten.
Operational Technology Security focuses on protecting hardware and software that controls industrial equipment and processes. This involves keeping industrial environments safe and compliant while maintaining efficient operations.Businesses increasingly adopt Operational Technology Security to protect industrial control systems from cyber threats. As these systems traditionally lack security measures, they require specialized solutions that integrate IT and OT networks. The growing concern...
Installation and deployment are easy. However, upgrading from one version to another can be challenging when clients are promised minus two upgrades. Cloud upgrades may become difficult, requiring on-site visits, and previous configurations might be lost during upgrades. The solution is easy to maintain. At the time of installation, there were no AI-related features, and I do not think AI is required for this solution. I rate Tenable OT Security a six out of ten.
I would recommend this platform due to its valuable features and benefits. Overall, I rate Tenable OT Security a nine out of ten.
Intrusion detection, configuration change detection, and inventory are the most compelling features for monitoring the OT environment. The main benefit is that it discovers vulnerabilities in the environment and network elements, such as switches, firewalls, and Windows and Linux servers. They have to look for a tool that covers the whole plant and can be integrated into the rest of the company's security systems. It reduces the risk of the ping attack and uncovers the vulnerabilities and misconfigurations present in the cell network. It's built in several parts. One is vulnerabilities, and the other is analyzing the attack path. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten. I recommend it. If clients need a solution for both IT and OT, I recommend Tenable OT Security. I suggest proceeding with Tenable OT Security if the client is small and needs IT and OT. However, I'll recommend Claroty Platform if the plant size is large and they need a more rigorous and detailed solution, including deep packet inspection.
I am a consultant. People wanting to use the product must check it before they buy. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
I would suggest before implementing it, do your research. Before opting for OT Security, how the infrastructure and the information system security are strong enough? And after that, go for OT Security part of it because all are linked. And the information security is the basic part of it. If that is not properly implemented, then OT Security implementation and management will be a difficult task for them. Overall, I would rate Tenable OT Security a seven out of ten.
It is a sufficient solution for threat detection. I recommend it to others and rate it a ten out of ten.