Regarding the traceability feature, we don't use traceability to such a high level because, as I mentioned, we are not using any safety modules for our applications which are out-of-box. We use traceability at a very minimal level. We are using this ALM tool as a software development tool rather than an ALM tool. We are not exploiting the whole ALM features, but primarily we are using it as a module for our custom development. We are not using the analytics function of PTC Integrity. What we do is we export the XLS of Integrity and put it into a third-party tool such as C-level procurement analytics. We have a third-party vendor and they display all the dashboards and indicate which zone is making which amount of profit. We don't use PTC Integrity or PTC in our application for this. When we talk about collaboration, PTC Integrity is easy to integrate and collaborate with other solutions. Codebeamer has come because Integrity does not have AI-related features because it is a pretty old tool. PTC Integrity is causing us a headache. We have to install it in 3,000 different systems. You cannot install PTC Integrity through right-click and run as administrator. It has to come through iTunes or a LANDesk package from a central repository. What happens is that it uses Java. If there is a vulnerability in some Java, the LANDesk team or the central packaging team has to redeploy everything and push the new package when there is a vulnerability attack. This thick client is causing a lot of pain in the long run. We are looking for a thin client solution, but we have such a high level of customization that we cannot mirror it in a different tool. I want to mirror it in some Jama tool or a Codebeamer or IBM DOORS, but it is next to impossible because our customization is tied to this particular tool itself. I would rate this product overall as an eight out of ten.
Inspector General at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Sep 5, 2023
I rate PTC Integrity an eight out of ten. It was a good solution five years back. However, at the moment, it does not have the latest technology. I advise others to evaluate new products as well.
Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Mar 16, 2020
We have not integrated this solution with our PLM system, yet. Overall, we are not very happy with PTC Integrity. I would rate this solution a six out of ten.
My advice to someone considering this solution is to prepare yourself by having a good programming team that has good customization engineers. It requires a lot of programming skills. I would rate it a seven out of ten. In the next release, I would like for there to not be so many scripts and programs to do workflow customization. It should be easily customizable.
Software Developer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Sep 15, 2019
I would rate this as five out of ten. You can use it for things from the previous decade. After 2010, whatever you want to do in terms of programming is very unusable.
The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products.
Regarding the traceability feature, we don't use traceability to such a high level because, as I mentioned, we are not using any safety modules for our applications which are out-of-box. We use traceability at a very minimal level. We are using this ALM tool as a software development tool rather than an ALM tool. We are not exploiting the whole ALM features, but primarily we are using it as a module for our custom development. We are not using the analytics function of PTC Integrity. What we do is we export the XLS of Integrity and put it into a third-party tool such as C-level procurement analytics. We have a third-party vendor and they display all the dashboards and indicate which zone is making which amount of profit. We don't use PTC Integrity or PTC in our application for this. When we talk about collaboration, PTC Integrity is easy to integrate and collaborate with other solutions. Codebeamer has come because Integrity does not have AI-related features because it is a pretty old tool. PTC Integrity is causing us a headache. We have to install it in 3,000 different systems. You cannot install PTC Integrity through right-click and run as administrator. It has to come through iTunes or a LANDesk package from a central repository. What happens is that it uses Java. If there is a vulnerability in some Java, the LANDesk team or the central packaging team has to redeploy everything and push the new package when there is a vulnerability attack. This thick client is causing a lot of pain in the long run. We are looking for a thin client solution, but we have such a high level of customization that we cannot mirror it in a different tool. I want to mirror it in some Jama tool or a Codebeamer or IBM DOORS, but it is next to impossible because our customization is tied to this particular tool itself. I would rate this product overall as an eight out of ten.
Our company currently rates PTC Integrity as seven out of ten. The overall product rating is 7.
The solution can be difficult for beginners but will become easy with continuous work. I rate it a nine out of ten.
I rate PTC Integrity an eight out of ten. It was a good solution five years back. However, at the moment, it does not have the latest technology. I advise others to evaluate new products as well.
I would rate the solution a seven out of ten.
I would rate it a six out of ten. To make it a ten they should improve the interface.
We have not integrated this solution with our PLM system, yet. Overall, we are not very happy with PTC Integrity. I would rate this solution a six out of ten.
In general, PTC Integrity is a good tool, although from a system perspective it is somewhat lacking. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
I would rate the product an eight out of 10.
My advice to someone considering this solution is to prepare yourself by having a good programming team that has good customization engineers. It requires a lot of programming skills. I would rate it a seven out of ten. In the next release, I would like for there to not be so many scripts and programs to do workflow customization. It should be easily customizable.
I would rate this as five out of ten. You can use it for things from the previous decade. After 2010, whatever you want to do in terms of programming is very unusable.