Exabeam and Logpoint is a standard submission of bank work, and I suggest the bank product that is the standard. Logpoint has an extra feature for analysis. The best product is a standard submission and is the most correlated to the product. I use the analysis for Logpoint, which I remember as the best. This is a tender. Logpoint's pricing is reasonable compared to Exabeam, and it is cost-efficient. The analytics feature, which is missing in Exabeam, needs improvement; two features are missing. Endpoint security EDR is not included; a third party is included here, and the Exabeam solution did not discuss this integration. The Bangladesh culture includes local training sessions, so Logpoint is the best here. I rate Logpoint ten out of ten.
CEO at a tech consulting company with 1-10 employees
Real User
Top 10
Mar 21, 2025
While I am working closely with Logpoint and could be considered a partner, I advise that improving cloud-native capabilities and introducing compliance mapping would enhance the product. Overall, I rate Logpoint as a seven out of ten.
I would not recommend Logpoint to US companies due to its lack of a US-based market focus. The platform offers necessary compliance at a reasonable price for European companies. rate the overall solution an eight on a scale of one to ten.
Overall, I would rate LogPoint an eight out of ten. I would say that if you want to start with a SIEM solution without having too much knowledge and don't want to spend too much time on day-to-day work, LogPoint would be an easy tool. The out-of-the-box capabilities are really good. It has lots of material insight that you can immediately start monitoring. However, to make it very effective with very few false positives and false negatives, it will take some time. For organizations (initial startups) that don't have too many security people and want to immediately start monitoring the system and start doing some kind of responses, LogPoint is going to be a good solution. Plus, on the pricing side, LogPoint's pricing is based on the number of log sources, not on events per second (EPS). This gives customers a good way to budget their expenses for the next year. They know that if they have a certain number of devices, this is the amount of money they are going to spend, whereas with EPS, you never know. EPS might go high, and their renewal prices will really go high. So that way, the pricing part is also good with LogPoint's log source-based pricing. The out-of-the-box capabilities are very good, so you can immediately start showing something on the screen and working on it. The technical team is very cooperative to get any kind of support that we need. But, the quality of the technical support team needs some improvement.
Senior Information Security Specialist at Growth Arbor
Real User
May 2, 2023
Integrations can be done using CSV files. My team is currently working on LogRhythm. The integration of LogRhythm is quite complicated. Most of the issues we faced while working on the solution were due to the customer’s system. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
SOC Analyst at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees
Real User
Nov 15, 2022
I have experience with IBM QRadar for more than three years. I also have experience with LogPoint. I've used LogRhythm as well for more than two years now. My company is a partner of LogPoint, but first, it was a vendor, then it became a partner that collectively collaborated with LogPoint, recommending LogPoint seminars to customers. Fifty percent of people in the organization use LogPoint, mostly security engineers. One person can handle the maintenance for LogPoint, specifically for a small organization. As I've not used LogPoint in the last four to six months, I'm no longer updated on what changes were made to the product. If LogPoint works much better for you, then I'd recommend it. Still, if you're considering the product commercially, it's better to go with another solution that works better, with fewer issues, at least from a smaller organization standpoint. My rating for LogPoint is four out of ten. I didn't give it a higher mark because it needs to improve in several areas, including the GUI, network hierarchy diagrams, and log optimization.
Security Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Aug 22, 2022
Knowing the market in 2022, I will not suggest on-premise implementations. I would rate it a 7 out of 10. It is doing its job, but there is always room for improvement.
My recommendation would be for others to try LogPoint out before making a decision, because it's a fairly new company, and you'll want to give them a try before you decide to purchase. I rate LogPoint a seven out of ten. There are some bugs that need to be fixed.
CEO at a tech consulting company with 1-10 employees
Real User
Top 10
May 16, 2022
I am just a customer and end-user. We use various versions of the solution. The latest version was the one I was using, however, I can't recall the exact version number. I'd rate the product eight out of ten. I'd advise potential new users to make sure that their use cases are designed beforehand. When you do a POC, then you need to have a success factor. People sometimes want to have a SIEM solution and then just look at the dashboard, which is total garbage. You need to know exactly what you want from that solution and if this is determined beforehand, then you can do a POC and then you will understand if the solution can deliver what you need - or not.
Chief Infrastructure & Security Office at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
Real User
Dec 8, 2021
It depends on what you're looking for. If you really want a full-blown SIEM with all the functionality and all the correlation analysis, you might be able to find products that have more sophisticated correlations, etc. If you just want to keep your logs and be able to find information quickly within your systems, LogPoint is more than capable. It is a good cost proposition, and it works extremely well and very fast. I would rate it an eight out of 10. It is a good cost proposition. It is a good value. It has all the functionality for what I wanted, which is my log management. I'm not using a lot of the feature sets that are very advanced. I don't need them, so I can't judge it based on those, but for my needs, it is an eight for sure.
It is highly recommended. It is a solid SIEM tool. It is very dependable and well-recognized. In terms of functionality, the queries work in the same way as Splunk. The only drawback is they are predominantly a European provider. Their headquarter is in Denmark and not in the US. Most of their market is in the European Union, but nonetheless, their customer service is excellent. You can get answers to any issue or question that you have related to the implementation right away. The learning curve is kind of on the medium side, and you need somebody on a full-time basis for UEBA. I would rate LogPoint a nine out of 10. It only needs better documentation.
Account Manager at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Reseller
Top 20
Feb 4, 2021
We do a combination of MSP and VAR services. We're a hybrid between the two. We are not a pure MSP. People don't seem to like having to pay a monthly fee whether or not people end up showing up or helping. We try to offer it as an "if you need it" basis, we can do it, but we don't have to charge you. We can sell them a bundle of hours, and that way they only use them when they need them, which is pretty popular with many of our clients, especially small to mid-size companies. We'll do a combination of, for instance, Sentinel One and Point Antivirus, which is an MSP service. It has 24-hour-a-day monitoring if they want. If they don't want that, we could do more of a typical kind of a semantic or any one of a number of Point Antiviruses that they want. We also have a Secure SIEM, it's our own product, www. securesiem.com. If they want to have a managed SIEM service, We also have, for those that have next-generation firewalls, we have a product called securengf.com. That basically shores up their next-generation firewall with our managed services. We use a help desk that lets them have 24-hour responsiveness to any issues instead of just having the firewall and having to go to look online. This will be somebody monitoring the firewall to make sure there are no breaches. If somebody needs wireless Wi-Fi, WLAN type of services, we can help them improve their signal strength and location of their access points. We're using QRadar as the engine. We are working as a partner with them to have our service use QRadar to achieve the best results for our customers. I believe we use some of their services of the monitoring itself. I would rate LogPoint an eight out of ten, because the technology seemed to be fairer to the customers, even with all the issues that I have indicated.
ICT Project Manager at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Jan 6, 2021
I would say that it's a good product. It's very stable, and the support is very good. We use it a lot. As I say, I'm looking to see whether or not it's still the product that we should be using or whether there's something out there now. I would rate LogPoint an eight out of ten.
Security Consultant at a government with 10,001+ employees
Consultant
Jun 4, 2020
I would advise people to be aware of their needs, and test some specific use cases, so that you get the benefits from the start, because you don't gain anything out of a SIEM system, if you don't have the right amount of data, from the right sources. I would rate this product an eight out of 10. I'm Danish so nobody gets a 10! There's always room for improvement.
We are moving away from this solution and are looking for something automated, like Darktrace. My advice for anybody who is implementing this solution is to first have a very clear understanding of the use cases, what you want to use it for, and what you want to report. Don't be afraid to look for a cloud-based solution, especially when it comes to SIEM products. It removes a lot of trouble related to internal servers and the complexity of accessing the SIEM from outside. If you have to implement your own MSA then I would suggest reconsidering any case of using an internal SIEM. Especially for smaller companies, this will provide much more value. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
Security Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Aug 21, 2019
We are a reseller, so we recommend a variety of solutions, including this one, to our clients. I really like the solution's licensing model. It's very useful. I would rate this solution eight out of ten. I would recommend it to others.
Manager Pre-sales Information Security at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Aug 4, 2019
We are a reseller of the solution. I would recommend the solution. Go with the trial version and evaluate it first, because individual tastes may differ. I'm not the end-user, I'm the reseller. We have managed to meet the customer's requirements for adhering to their compliance or getting the solution onboard to their satisfaction. In the end, however, when an end-user uses the solution, they will ultimately have a clearer idea about the pitfalls or upsides of it. I would rate the solution eight out of ten.
Logpoint offers a robust SIEM system tailored for compliance with regulations like PCI DSS and GDPR, enhancing security monitoring and enabling efficient incident response.Logpoint strengthens cybersecurity by offering essential tools for log collection, security monitoring, and forensic analysis. Its features include an intuitive dashboard, a powerful correlation engine, and extensive third-party integrations, making it a versatile asset for security operations centers. Despite its...
Exabeam and Logpoint is a standard submission of bank work, and I suggest the bank product that is the standard. Logpoint has an extra feature for analysis. The best product is a standard submission and is the most correlated to the product. I use the analysis for Logpoint, which I remember as the best. This is a tender. Logpoint's pricing is reasonable compared to Exabeam, and it is cost-efficient. The analytics feature, which is missing in Exabeam, needs improvement; two features are missing. Endpoint security EDR is not included; a third party is included here, and the Exabeam solution did not discuss this integration. The Bangladesh culture includes local training sessions, so Logpoint is the best here. I rate Logpoint ten out of ten.
While I am working closely with Logpoint and could be considered a partner, I advise that improving cloud-native capabilities and introducing compliance mapping would enhance the product. Overall, I rate Logpoint as a seven out of ten.
I would not recommend Logpoint to US companies due to its lack of a US-based market focus. The platform offers necessary compliance at a reasonable price for European companies. rate the overall solution an eight on a scale of one to ten.
Overall, I would rate LogPoint an eight out of ten. I would say that if you want to start with a SIEM solution without having too much knowledge and don't want to spend too much time on day-to-day work, LogPoint would be an easy tool. The out-of-the-box capabilities are really good. It has lots of material insight that you can immediately start monitoring. However, to make it very effective with very few false positives and false negatives, it will take some time. For organizations (initial startups) that don't have too many security people and want to immediately start monitoring the system and start doing some kind of responses, LogPoint is going to be a good solution. Plus, on the pricing side, LogPoint's pricing is based on the number of log sources, not on events per second (EPS). This gives customers a good way to budget their expenses for the next year. They know that if they have a certain number of devices, this is the amount of money they are going to spend, whereas with EPS, you never know. EPS might go high, and their renewal prices will really go high. So that way, the pricing part is also good with LogPoint's log source-based pricing. The out-of-the-box capabilities are very good, so you can immediately start showing something on the screen and working on it. The technical team is very cooperative to get any kind of support that we need. But, the quality of the technical support team needs some improvement.
I rate Logpoint an eight out of ten.
Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.
I rate Logpoint an eight out of ten.
Integrations can be done using CSV files. My team is currently working on LogRhythm. The integration of LogRhythm is quite complicated. Most of the issues we faced while working on the solution were due to the customer’s system. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
I'd rate LogPoint a seven out of ten. I haven't used many SIEM solutions, so I can't compare it with them, but it was good.
I rate this solution a nine out of ten. It is a good product, and while it has complex security, it has many features.
I have experience with IBM QRadar for more than three years. I also have experience with LogPoint. I've used LogRhythm as well for more than two years now. My company is a partner of LogPoint, but first, it was a vendor, then it became a partner that collectively collaborated with LogPoint, recommending LogPoint seminars to customers. Fifty percent of people in the organization use LogPoint, mostly security engineers. One person can handle the maintenance for LogPoint, specifically for a small organization. As I've not used LogPoint in the last four to six months, I'm no longer updated on what changes were made to the product. If LogPoint works much better for you, then I'd recommend it. Still, if you're considering the product commercially, it's better to go with another solution that works better, with fewer issues, at least from a smaller organization standpoint. My rating for LogPoint is four out of ten. I didn't give it a higher mark because it needs to improve in several areas, including the GUI, network hierarchy diagrams, and log optimization.
Knowing the market in 2022, I will not suggest on-premise implementations. I would rate it a 7 out of 10. It is doing its job, but there is always room for improvement.
My recommendation would be for others to try LogPoint out before making a decision, because it's a fairly new company, and you'll want to give them a try before you decide to purchase. I rate LogPoint a seven out of ten. There are some bugs that need to be fixed.
I am just a customer and end-user. We use various versions of the solution. The latest version was the one I was using, however, I can't recall the exact version number. I'd rate the product eight out of ten. I'd advise potential new users to make sure that their use cases are designed beforehand. When you do a POC, then you need to have a success factor. People sometimes want to have a SIEM solution and then just look at the dashboard, which is total garbage. You need to know exactly what you want from that solution and if this is determined beforehand, then you can do a POC and then you will understand if the solution can deliver what you need - or not.
I would rate it an eight out of ten.
It depends on what you're looking for. If you really want a full-blown SIEM with all the functionality and all the correlation analysis, you might be able to find products that have more sophisticated correlations, etc. If you just want to keep your logs and be able to find information quickly within your systems, LogPoint is more than capable. It is a good cost proposition, and it works extremely well and very fast. I would rate it an eight out of 10. It is a good cost proposition. It is a good value. It has all the functionality for what I wanted, which is my log management. I'm not using a lot of the feature sets that are very advanced. I don't need them, so I can't judge it based on those, but for my needs, it is an eight for sure.
It is highly recommended. It is a solid SIEM tool. It is very dependable and well-recognized. In terms of functionality, the queries work in the same way as Splunk. The only drawback is they are predominantly a European provider. Their headquarter is in Denmark and not in the US. Most of their market is in the European Union, but nonetheless, their customer service is excellent. You can get answers to any issue or question that you have related to the implementation right away. The learning curve is kind of on the medium side, and you need somebody on a full-time basis for UEBA. I would rate LogPoint a nine out of 10. It only needs better documentation.
We do a combination of MSP and VAR services. We're a hybrid between the two. We are not a pure MSP. People don't seem to like having to pay a monthly fee whether or not people end up showing up or helping. We try to offer it as an "if you need it" basis, we can do it, but we don't have to charge you. We can sell them a bundle of hours, and that way they only use them when they need them, which is pretty popular with many of our clients, especially small to mid-size companies. We'll do a combination of, for instance, Sentinel One and Point Antivirus, which is an MSP service. It has 24-hour-a-day monitoring if they want. If they don't want that, we could do more of a typical kind of a semantic or any one of a number of Point Antiviruses that they want. We also have a Secure SIEM, it's our own product, www. securesiem.com. If they want to have a managed SIEM service, We also have, for those that have next-generation firewalls, we have a product called securengf.com. That basically shores up their next-generation firewall with our managed services. We use a help desk that lets them have 24-hour responsiveness to any issues instead of just having the firewall and having to go to look online. This will be somebody monitoring the firewall to make sure there are no breaches. If somebody needs wireless Wi-Fi, WLAN type of services, we can help them improve their signal strength and location of their access points. We're using QRadar as the engine. We are working as a partner with them to have our service use QRadar to achieve the best results for our customers. I believe we use some of their services of the monitoring itself. I would rate LogPoint an eight out of ten, because the technology seemed to be fairer to the customers, even with all the issues that I have indicated.
I would say that it's a good product. It's very stable, and the support is very good. We use it a lot. As I say, I'm looking to see whether or not it's still the product that we should be using or whether there's something out there now. I would rate LogPoint an eight out of ten.
I would advise people to be aware of their needs, and test some specific use cases, so that you get the benefits from the start, because you don't gain anything out of a SIEM system, if you don't have the right amount of data, from the right sources. I would rate this product an eight out of 10. I'm Danish so nobody gets a 10! There's always room for improvement.
We are moving away from this solution and are looking for something automated, like Darktrace. My advice for anybody who is implementing this solution is to first have a very clear understanding of the use cases, what you want to use it for, and what you want to report. Don't be afraid to look for a cloud-based solution, especially when it comes to SIEM products. It removes a lot of trouble related to internal servers and the complexity of accessing the SIEM from outside. If you have to implement your own MSA then I would suggest reconsidering any case of using an internal SIEM. Especially for smaller companies, this will provide much more value. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
We are a reseller, so we recommend a variety of solutions, including this one, to our clients. I really like the solution's licensing model. It's very useful. I would rate this solution eight out of ten. I would recommend it to others.
We are a reseller of the solution. I would recommend the solution. Go with the trial version and evaluate it first, because individual tastes may differ. I'm not the end-user, I'm the reseller. We have managed to meet the customer's requirements for adhering to their compliance or getting the solution onboard to their satisfaction. In the end, however, when an end-user uses the solution, they will ultimately have a clearer idea about the pitfalls or upsides of it. I would rate the solution eight out of ten.