The vendor should market the solution more. The solution can be managed by one person. I would recommend this solution to others. I rate Ixia BreakingPoint a seven out of ten
I would recommend Ixia BreakingPoint to potential users. I can recommend this solution for personal use cases. For others, the price might be too high. On a scale from one to ten, I would give Ixia BreakingPoint a nine.
Director at a aerospace/defense firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Nov 13, 2019
We use the on-premises deployment model. I'd recommend the solution to others. We don't use all of its features, but it gives us what we need. I'd rate it nine out of ten.
Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Jun 23, 2019
I would recommend not to use the OpenStack solution. It's hard to implement. If you have a choice, choose VMware. If you want high-performance, use recommended hardware with DPDK and Intel support. Use new hardware with PCI Express 3.0/3.1. Use multiple network cards for multiple blades. On a scale of 1 to 10, I would rate Ixia BreakingPoint a nine.
SDWAN Architect at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
May 30, 2019
Make sure that you can heavily test the product before purchasing. Testing will tell you if it works as expected with your lab setup. The breaking point UI is little bit fuzzy compare to the Spirent Cyberflood. On a scale of 1-10, I would rate this product a 7.
Find out what your peers are saying about Keysight Technologies, OWASP, Appvance and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: May 2026.
Static Application Security Testing provides tools to identify vulnerabilities in code early in the development cycle, improving security and minimizing risk exposure.SAST focuses on analyzing source code, binaries, or bytecode to detect issues like SQL injection, buffer overflows, and cross-site scripting. This proactive approach enables developers to remediate potential security flaws before applications are deployed. The solution integrates seamlessly with existing CI/CD pipelines,...
The vendor should market the solution more. The solution can be managed by one person. I would recommend this solution to others. I rate Ixia BreakingPoint a seven out of ten
I would recommend Ixia BreakingPoint to potential users. I can recommend this solution for personal use cases. For others, the price might be too high. On a scale from one to ten, I would give Ixia BreakingPoint a nine.
We use the on-premises deployment model. I'd recommend the solution to others. We don't use all of its features, but it gives us what we need. I'd rate it nine out of ten.
I would recommend not to use the OpenStack solution. It's hard to implement. If you have a choice, choose VMware. If you want high-performance, use recommended hardware with DPDK and Intel support. Use new hardware with PCI Express 3.0/3.1. Use multiple network cards for multiple blades. On a scale of 1 to 10, I would rate Ixia BreakingPoint a nine.
Make sure that you can heavily test the product before purchasing. Testing will tell you if it works as expected with your lab setup. The breaking point UI is little bit fuzzy compare to the Spirent Cyberflood. On a scale of 1-10, I would rate this product a 7.
If you want to deploy it on OpenStack, you should start with the support question about how you should do it.