I give IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog a seven out of ten. We have three people using the solution and we don't have plans to increase the usage. I recommend IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog.
I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it. I would rate IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog an eight out of ten.
In my company, ten to fifteen people use IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog, but in the companies of clients, more people use the product. My advice to others planning to start using IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is that it's a very good product, but the primary concern is the missing connectors. IBM is working hard on that area and trying to come up with new connectors with every release, so it's a good product to use for the purpose of data governance, though you can find better solutions for the same purpose. My rating for IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is eight out of ten. My company is a partner of IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog.
Data Architect at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
2022-07-11T22:31:00Z
Jul 11, 2022
InfoSphere requires a lot of direct coding. It's important to invest in the tools, in the environment, as well as in the time to do the coding. There are various versions, but the channels are basically the same. The cloud version has a lot of restrictions because they have matrix code. And when you are looking to do something outside the logic require a lot time and effort from Engineering team, I rate this solution six out of 10.
Anonymous at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 20
2022-06-22T17:23:00Z
Jun 22, 2022
My company aimed to have about two hundred users of IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog, but only about five people tried to use it. If you're looking into using the product, my advice is to ensure that your infrastructure and security requirements are in line with IBM's recommendations. This is a product that houses sensitive information, yet on Linux, there's this requirement of certain security features needing to be disabled, which doesn't make much sense. I'm rating IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog three out of ten.
Learn what your peers think about IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
Information governance is a next-gen comprehensive process of administering, enhancing, and collating information to strengthen an organization’s trust and belief that its decision and business processes are the best for the organization’s overall health and continued progress. IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is an intuitive, progressive web-based tool that empowers users to discover, comprehend, and dissect information. Users are able to design, administer, and collaborate to...
I give IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog a seven out of ten. We have three people using the solution and we don't have plans to increase the usage. I recommend IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog.
I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it. I would rate IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog an eight out of ten.
In my company, ten to fifteen people use IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog, but in the companies of clients, more people use the product. My advice to others planning to start using IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is that it's a very good product, but the primary concern is the missing connectors. IBM is working hard on that area and trying to come up with new connectors with every release, so it's a good product to use for the purpose of data governance, though you can find better solutions for the same purpose. My rating for IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is eight out of ten. My company is a partner of IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog.
InfoSphere requires a lot of direct coding. It's important to invest in the tools, in the environment, as well as in the time to do the coding. There are various versions, but the channels are basically the same. The cloud version has a lot of restrictions because they have matrix code. And when you are looking to do something outside the logic require a lot time and effort from Engineering team, I rate this solution six out of 10.
My company aimed to have about two hundred users of IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog, but only about five people tried to use it. If you're looking into using the product, my advice is to ensure that your infrastructure and security requirements are in line with IBM's recommendations. This is a product that houses sensitive information, yet on Linux, there's this requirement of certain security features needing to be disabled, which doesn't make much sense. I'm rating IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog three out of ten.
We're a customer and end-user. I would rate the solution nine out of ten.