DevOps Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
2024-11-11T16:18:01Z
Nov 11, 2024
I would recommend Harbor to others currently. It is necessary to consider the specific use case, as JFrog can be more advantageous if you develop your own applications. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
Senior System Administrator at Nucleus Software Exports Limited
Real User
2020-09-15T11:13:31Z
Sep 15, 2020
My advice to people looking into Harbor is that I think it is a good tool. There is no reason not to try and use it because it is a free solution for everyone. Everyone can give a try for that price. On a scale from one to ten (where one is the worst and ten is the best), I would rate Harbor as a seven-out-of-ten. The GUI interface can be better and more user-friendly. There may also be some opportunity to offer different options for storage. If we are working on AWS, we can store its data in the S3 (Simple Cloud Storage), but that is not very straightforward and complicates the processing. The storage means we mainly use right now is the EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud [Amazon]). We would normally make the storage in EC2, but we need to use Harbor with S3. Because of this, we need to do a lot of things manually. This complicates the processes. The solution is okay, but the issues with storage makes some things a more time-consuming process than they need to be.
Container Registry is a secure storage and management solution for container images, key for automating the Docker container lifecycle from development to production.Container Registry enables development teams to manage and deploy containers at scale. Offering integration with CI/CD pipelines, it supports efficient development workflows. By providing security features and version control, it streamlines the handling of containerized applications across environments.What are the essential...
I would recommend Harbor to others currently. It is necessary to consider the specific use case, as JFrog can be more advantageous if you develop your own applications. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
My advice to people looking into Harbor is that I think it is a good tool. There is no reason not to try and use it because it is a free solution for everyone. Everyone can give a try for that price. On a scale from one to ten (where one is the worst and ten is the best), I would rate Harbor as a seven-out-of-ten. The GUI interface can be better and more user-friendly. There may also be some opportunity to offer different options for storage. If we are working on AWS, we can store its data in the S3 (Simple Cloud Storage), but that is not very straightforward and complicates the processing. The storage means we mainly use right now is the EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud [Amazon]). We would normally make the storage in EC2, but we need to use Harbor with S3. Because of this, we need to do a lot of things manually. This complicates the processes. The solution is okay, but the issues with storage makes some things a more time-consuming process than they need to be.