It depends on the licensing. It is scalable, I would say. The reason is that Qt supports testing on Java SWT, and HP probably did not. I conducted an evaluation, and at that moment, Qt was the best. The overall product rating is eight out of ten.
Test Automation Specialist at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
Mar 20, 2024
HMI testing with Squish is similar to testing normal software because both involve graphical user interfaces. The experience is largely the same. However, HMI systems are typically easier to test because their interfaces are usually more straightforward and less complex than other software, such as complex 3D applications. This simpler structure of HMI interfaces generally makes the testing process smoother and more manageable. Integrating behavior-driven development (BDD) within Squish is particularly beneficial in terms of enhancing testing efficiency. This feature allows for the creation of readable test descriptions or designs using BDD principles. It lets users write clear and understandable tests initially and then incrementally implement the necessary functions in programming code. The behavior-driven approach encourages the creation of reusable and well-structured test steps. When you carefully create the test scenarios, it becomes much easier to avoid writing unnecessary code, enhancing the reusability of the tests. I am very satisfied with how the product handles desktop and embedded HMI testing. I appreciate its stability and wide range of functions, which allow it to tackle various testing challenges effectively. It is a powerful and reliable testing tool, but it is also expensive. I recommend Squish for automated GUI testing, provided the user has the necessary budget. I rate it an eight out of ten.
froglogic Squish does not have a lot of competition. If somebody is specifically working in a Qt environment and they're looking for a GUI regression, this is one of the tools that they have to look into. It's recommended not only by Qt, but it is also one of the best available tools in the market. I would rate froglogic Squish a nine out of ten.
Sr. Software Solution Engineer at Meteonic Innovation Pvt Ltd at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.
Real User
Jan 9, 2019
Squish requires the executable application and not the source code. So using Squish will be simple, and I am sure anybody can handle Squish very easily. Squish provides free evaluation with professional support. I would say, take up an evaluation and try it on your application. Squish is the best GUI testing tool for me.
Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.
It depends on the licensing. It is scalable, I would say. The reason is that Qt supports testing on Java SWT, and HP probably did not. I conducted an evaluation, and at that moment, Qt was the best. The overall product rating is eight out of ten.
I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
HMI testing with Squish is similar to testing normal software because both involve graphical user interfaces. The experience is largely the same. However, HMI systems are typically easier to test because their interfaces are usually more straightforward and less complex than other software, such as complex 3D applications. This simpler structure of HMI interfaces generally makes the testing process smoother and more manageable. Integrating behavior-driven development (BDD) within Squish is particularly beneficial in terms of enhancing testing efficiency. This feature allows for the creation of readable test descriptions or designs using BDD principles. It lets users write clear and understandable tests initially and then incrementally implement the necessary functions in programming code. The behavior-driven approach encourages the creation of reusable and well-structured test steps. When you carefully create the test scenarios, it becomes much easier to avoid writing unnecessary code, enhancing the reusability of the tests. I am very satisfied with how the product handles desktop and embedded HMI testing. I appreciate its stability and wide range of functions, which allow it to tackle various testing challenges effectively. It is a powerful and reliable testing tool, but it is also expensive. I recommend Squish for automated GUI testing, provided the user has the necessary budget. I rate it an eight out of ten.
Certainly, I would recommend Squish. I would rate it around eight to nine.
I would recommend this solution to new users. On a scale from one to ten, I would give froglogic Squish an eight.
froglogic Squish does not have a lot of competition. If somebody is specifically working in a Qt environment and they're looking for a GUI regression, this is one of the tools that they have to look into. It's recommended not only by Qt, but it is also one of the best available tools in the market. I would rate froglogic Squish a nine out of ten.
I rate this solution an eight out of 10.
Best tool, and a must-try tool for everyone.
Squish requires the executable application and not the source code. So using Squish will be simple, and I am sure anybody can handle Squish very easily. Squish provides free evaluation with professional support. I would say, take up an evaluation and try it on your application. Squish is the best GUI testing tool for me.