While we use Codebeamer's risk management features, this is the least known feature for me. I know that they use it for risk, and sometimes I have to work with it, but it's quite isolated from the requirement management or test management, which I believe are much more important. I don't deal with prices regarding Codebeamer as it's not my business. I would recommend Codebeamer to other companies. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Codebeamer an eight.
Codebeamer has helped us gain insights into our project's performance and health by making it easier during our PI planning or sprint planning sessions. When we know what needs to be developed or tested, it is easy to assign tasks or input them into the backlog. However, when end users or customers raise new requests or tickets, it becomes challenging to estimate time or assignments. Codebeamer is helpful in this scenario because we can use the Kanban board to post tickets, allowing whoever has the capacity or knowledge to pull the ticket and work on it, which I feel is a good feature. I rate Codebeamer 8 out of 10.
I could benefit from AI integrations, such as using large language models for the documentation and providing an interactive chatbot for real-time help in the user interface. The overall rating for Codebeamer is seven out of ten.
The platform provided the flexibility to expand our business processes, accommodating or altering them to suit the requirements of a changing environment. Additionally, its flow management capabilities are really good. The out-of-the-box reporting feature is decent. I rate it a seven out of ten.
I recommend the product to those who plan to use it since it offers a system that is suitable for any kind of project. Though it is a good product, it is not something that new people can learn to use within a short amount of time. I rate the overall tool a seven out of ten.
Process Method and Tool Developer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
Mar 9, 2023
I'm an end-user. I'm not sure which version of the solution I am currently using. This solution isn't as mature as other options. I'd advise users to implement it if they want a fully integrated system. Stick to their philosophy. If you follow too closely with processes from old legacy products, you may run into trouble. It's best to instead lose your old habits and follow the codeBeamer approach. Don't handle the replacement of tools like Doors or Jira alone. This solution can cover more. That's the strength of the product. You need to dig into it a bit and see what else it can do. You need to embrace the complexity to a certain level. That might be a difficulty for some, however, that is the strength as well. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
codeBeamer is a great tool, but having said that, make sure that you have the proper expertise to understand the ALM. As there are around 1,000 plus advantages with codeBeamer, I'd recommend that you go to their website to fully understand just how beautiful that tool is. On a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of ten. one important aspect of codeBeamer is its overall capability in multifaceted domains and readily available templates. We talk mostly about it from the automotive aspect, but this tool is great for all industries, specifically the aerospace and pharmaceutical industries.
We're a reseller and a solution partner. We generally give the clients the latest version of the solution. Often, we convert a user from IBM DOORS. If they need to replace DOORS I need to get an ALM requirement to them. I'd recommend the solution. It's not an ideal solution for small companies or internet-based companies. However, it's perfect for industrial customers. Overall, the solution is quite good and we've really liked it. I'd rate it eight out of ten.
Overall, I have about 16 years of experience in Agile processes, and about 10 years of experience with ALM products. I am CSM/CSPO certified and work with Agile a lot, which has put in a good position to evaluate these products. My advice to anybody who is implementing codeBeamer is to make sure to understand what data is needed from multiple ends. You need to use the concept of data warehousing and BI reports. I find it very simple and easy to use, but there are several areas in need of improvement. I would rate this solution a six out of ten.
codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.
While we use Codebeamer's risk management features, this is the least known feature for me. I know that they use it for risk, and sometimes I have to work with it, but it's quite isolated from the requirement management or test management, which I believe are much more important. I don't deal with prices regarding Codebeamer as it's not my business. I would recommend Codebeamer to other companies. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Codebeamer an eight.
Codebeamer has helped us gain insights into our project's performance and health by making it easier during our PI planning or sprint planning sessions. When we know what needs to be developed or tested, it is easy to assign tasks or input them into the backlog. However, when end users or customers raise new requests or tickets, it becomes challenging to estimate time or assignments. Codebeamer is helpful in this scenario because we can use the Kanban board to post tickets, allowing whoever has the capacity or knowledge to pull the ticket and work on it, which I feel is a good feature. I rate Codebeamer 8 out of 10.
I would recommend Codebeamer to others. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the overall solution a nine.
I could benefit from AI integrations, such as using large language models for the documentation and providing an interactive chatbot for real-time help in the user interface. The overall rating for Codebeamer is seven out of ten.
I'd rate the solution six out of ten.
I recommend the solution. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
The platform provided the flexibility to expand our business processes, accommodating or altering them to suit the requirements of a changing environment. Additionally, its flow management capabilities are really good. The out-of-the-box reporting feature is decent. I rate it a seven out of ten.
I recommend the product to those who plan to use it since it offers a system that is suitable for any kind of project. Though it is a good product, it is not something that new people can learn to use within a short amount of time. I rate the overall tool a seven out of ten.
Overall, I would rate Codebeamer as an right out of ten.
I'm an end-user. I'm not sure which version of the solution I am currently using. This solution isn't as mature as other options. I'd advise users to implement it if they want a fully integrated system. Stick to their philosophy. If you follow too closely with processes from old legacy products, you may run into trouble. It's best to instead lose your old habits and follow the codeBeamer approach. Don't handle the replacement of tools like Doors or Jira alone. This solution can cover more. That's the strength of the product. You need to dig into it a bit and see what else it can do. You need to embrace the complexity to a certain level. That might be a difficulty for some, however, that is the strength as well. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
codeBeamer is a great tool, but having said that, make sure that you have the proper expertise to understand the ALM. As there are around 1,000 plus advantages with codeBeamer, I'd recommend that you go to their website to fully understand just how beautiful that tool is. On a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of ten. one important aspect of codeBeamer is its overall capability in multifaceted domains and readily available templates. We talk mostly about it from the automotive aspect, but this tool is great for all industries, specifically the aerospace and pharmaceutical industries.
We're a reseller and a solution partner. We generally give the clients the latest version of the solution. Often, we convert a user from IBM DOORS. If they need to replace DOORS I need to get an ALM requirement to them. I'd recommend the solution. It's not an ideal solution for small companies or internet-based companies. However, it's perfect for industrial customers. Overall, the solution is quite good and we've really liked it. I'd rate it eight out of ten.
Overall, I have about 16 years of experience in Agile processes, and about 10 years of experience with ALM products. I am CSM/CSPO certified and work with Agile a lot, which has put in a good position to evaluate these products. My advice to anybody who is implementing codeBeamer is to make sure to understand what data is needed from multiple ends. You need to use the concept of data warehousing and BI reports. I find it very simple and easy to use, but there are several areas in need of improvement. I would rate this solution a six out of ten.