My advice to others looking into using Check Point DDoS Protector is to conduct a proper network assessment to size the solution correctly, enable continuous monitoring to quickly detect and respond to attacks, and leverage Check Point support during initial setup for smooth deployment. I rate this solution seven out of ten.
Network Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Feb 13, 2023
I'd recommend going for Radware DDoS than Check Point. My company has moved from Check Point DDoS to Radware DDoS because of lousy support. In my personal experience, it's much better and much easier to work with Radware support than Check Point support. Overall, I'd rate Check Point DDoS Protector an eight out of ten.
My advice for anybody who is considering this product is to evaluate based on the following points: * Where you want to place or installed your DDOS appliance. * What throughput mitigation is required. * Whether the device supports cloud signaling. * Determine whether the SSL decryption card is available with the box or needs to be purchased in addition. * License and port requirements in terms of whether you need copper or fiber.
Their support is very good. We don't have a lot of down time. Professional services are very knowledgable when it comes to the hardware. The management and using of your console is very easy also. Palo Alto is more difficult to use. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten because it's good but it's not perfect.
Modern DDoS attacks use new techniques to exploit areas that traditional security solutions are not equipped to protect. These attacks can cause serious network downtime to businesses who rely on networks and Web services to operate. DDoS Protector Security Appliances and Cloud DDoS Protection Services block destructive DDoS attacks before they cause damageLearn more about Ddos Protector.
My advice to others looking into using Check Point DDoS Protector is to conduct a proper network assessment to size the solution correctly, enable continuous monitoring to quickly detect and respond to attacks, and leverage Check Point support during initial setup for smooth deployment. I rate this solution seven out of ten.
Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
I'd recommend going for Radware DDoS than Check Point. My company has moved from Check Point DDoS to Radware DDoS because of lousy support. In my personal experience, it's much better and much easier to work with Radware support than Check Point support. Overall, I'd rate Check Point DDoS Protector an eight out of ten.
It is a great solution with very good features and provides excellent security.
It is an excellent tool for perimeter security.
My advice for anybody who is considering this product is to evaluate based on the following points: * Where you want to place or installed your DDOS appliance. * What throughput mitigation is required. * Whether the device supports cloud signaling. * Determine whether the SSL decryption card is available with the box or needs to be purchased in addition. * License and port requirements in terms of whether you need copper or fiber.
Their support is very good. We don't have a lot of down time. Professional services are very knowledgable when it comes to the hardware. The management and using of your console is very easy also. Palo Alto is more difficult to use. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten because it's good but it's not perfect.