Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
SingleStore Logo

Top 10 SingleStore Alternatives

Vendor: SingleStore
4.4 out of 5
Leave a review

Top SingleStore Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to SingleStore based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include PostgreSQL, Redis, and Chroma. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

SingleStore surpasses its competitors by delivering high-speed analytics, a unified cloud-native architecture, and real-time data processing capabilities, empowering businesses to efficiently handle diverse workloads and unlock actionable insights from complex data sets.

SingleStore Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with SingleStore, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
SingleStore Logo
PostgreSQL
4.2 out of 5
SingleStore Logo
PostgreSQL
4.2 out of 5
PostgreSQL offers extensive scalability and ACID compliance, appealing to developers seeking open-source flexibility. In comparison, SingleStore excels in high concurrency and quick response times, making it suitable for environments needing efficient processing of heavy workloads and complex queries.
Download PostgreSQL vs. SingleStore Report
PostgreSQL has no setup costs, making it more cost-effective initially, while SingleStore's higher setup costs reflect its advanced features and scalability.
View comparison
Pricing
PostgreSQL has no setup costs, making it more cost-effective initially, while SingleStore's higher setup costs reflect its advanced features and scalability.
SingleStore Logo
Redis
4.4 out of 5
SingleStore Logo
Redis
4.4 out of 5
Redis offers fast in-memory storage and diverse data structures, ideal for real-time applications. In comparison, SingleStore provides MySQL compatibility and high concurrency, suiting complex analytics. Redis has cost-effective open-source options, while SingleStore offers competitive pricing models for enhanced analytical capabilities.
Download Redis vs. SingleStore Report
Redis has a lower setup cost compared to SingleStore, offering a budget-friendly option, while SingleStore provides more versatile setup features, which justifies its higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Redis has a lower setup cost compared to SingleStore, offering a budget-friendly option, while SingleStore provides more versatile setup features, which justifies its higher initial investment.
SingleStore Logo
Chroma
4.3 out of 5
SingleStore Logo
Chroma
4.3 out of 5
SingleStore is ideal for those seeking speed and scalability with favorable pricing and responsive support. In comparison, Chroma attracts with advanced analytics and tailored services, appealing to businesses needing deep insights and are willing to invest in higher setup costs for long-term benefits.
Download Chroma vs. SingleStore Report
SingleStore's setup cost is more significant compared to Chroma's low setup expenses, highlighting a financial distinction between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
SingleStore's setup cost is more significant compared to Chroma's low setup expenses, highlighting a financial distinction between the two solutions.
SingleStore Logo
Amazon RDS
4.2 out of 5
SingleStore Logo
Amazon RDS
4.2 out of 5
Amazon RDS offers cost-effectiveness and reliable customer service, ideal for tech buyers seeking affordability and support. In comparison, SingleStore provides real-time analytics and superior performance, catering to those prioritizing advanced features and higher ROI despite a higher price.
Download Amazon RDS vs. SingleStore Report
Amazon RDS incurs a higher setup cost compared to SingleStore's lower initial setup fees. SingleStore provides a cost-effective solution for initial setup, in contrast to Amazon RDS which is comparatively expensive upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon RDS incurs a higher setup cost compared to SingleStore's lower initial setup fees. SingleStore provides a cost-effective solution for initial setup, in contrast to Amazon RDS which is comparatively expensive upfront.
SingleStore Logo
Milvus
3.7 out of 5
SingleStore Logo
Milvus
3.7 out of 5
SingleStore's flexibility and high-speed analytics attract businesses with diverse data needs. In comparison, Milvus excels in vector database management, appealing to AI and machine learning applications. SingleStore offers seamless cloud integration, while Milvus requires expertise for optimal deployment.
Download Milvus vs. SingleStore Report
SingleStore requires a higher setup cost, while Milvus offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
SingleStore requires a higher setup cost, while Milvus offers a more cost-effective setup option.
SingleStore Logo
SingleStore Logo
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB simplifies global distribution and scalability with seamless Microsoft integration, appealing to those needing diverse data model support. In comparison, SingleStore offers speed and cost-effectiveness for real-time analytics, ideal for high-volume data processing and efficient query handling.
Download Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. SingleStore Report
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB typically incurs higher setup costs, while SingleStore offers more affordable initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB typically incurs higher setup costs, while SingleStore offers more affordable initial expenses.
SingleStore Logo
SingleStore Logo
Microsoft Azure SQL Database
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Azure SQL Database offers great scalability, integration with Microsoft services, and robust security. In comparison, SingleStore features high performance, real-time analytics, and operational flexibility. Microsoft Azure SQL Database faces pricing complexity, while SingleStore benefits from potentially higher ROI despite higher initial costs.
Download Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs. SingleStore Report
Microsoft Azure SQL Database has a higher setup cost, while SingleStore offers a more budget-friendly setup option. SingleStore's lower initial investment contrasts with Azure SQL Database's higher price, making cost a distinguishing factor for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Azure SQL Database has a higher setup cost, while SingleStore offers a more budget-friendly setup option. SingleStore's lower initial investment contrasts with Azure SQL Database's higher price, making cost a distinguishing factor for budget-conscious users.
SingleStore Logo
Pinecone
4.0 out of 5
SingleStore Logo
Pinecone
4.0 out of 5
SingleStore offers high-speed data processing and seamless integration, ideal for real-time analytics. In comparison, Pinecone focuses on vector data management, which benefits machine learning applications. SingleStore provides a customizable setup, while Pinecone simplifies deployment with a managed service model, aiding AI projects.
Download Pinecone vs. SingleStore Report
SingleStore presents a higher setup cost compared to Pinecone, giving it a distinct pricing edge. Pinecone users benefit from a more economical entry point, enhancing its appeal for cost-conscious customers.
View comparison
Pricing
SingleStore presents a higher setup cost compared to Pinecone, giving it a distinct pricing edge. Pinecone users benefit from a more economical entry point, enhancing its appeal for cost-conscious customers.
SingleStore Logo
Cassandra
4.0 out of 5
SingleStore Logo
Cassandra
4.0 out of 5
Cassandra efficiently manages vast data with high availability and partition tolerance. In comparison, SingleStore excels in real-time processing and advanced analytics. While Cassandra offers a cost-effective solution for scalability, SingleStore provides greater ROI through enhanced performance and user-friendly deployment.
Download Cassandra vs. SingleStore Report
Cassandra's setup cost is considered higher than SingleStore, which offers a more affordable initial investment for users.
View comparison
Pricing
Cassandra's setup cost is considered higher than SingleStore, which offers a more affordable initial investment for users.
SingleStore Logo
Supabase Vector
4.3 out of 5
SingleStore Logo
Supabase Vector
4.3 out of 5
SingleStore appeals to cost-conscious businesses through its competitive pricing and easy deployment with dedicated support. In comparison, Supabase Vector attracts those seeking rich functionality with integration capabilities, although it comes with a higher price point, suiting complex application needs.
Download SingleStore vs. Supabase Vector Report
SingleStore requires a higher initial setup cost compared to Supabase Vector, offering distinct pricing structures. Supabase Vector presents a more affordable setup option, appealing to cost-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
SingleStore requires a higher initial setup cost compared to Supabase Vector, offering distinct pricing structures. Supabase Vector presents a more affordable setup option, appealing to cost-conscious users.
SingleStore Logo
ClickHouse
4.4 out of 5
SingleStore Logo
ClickHouse
4.4 out of 5
SingleStore provides advanced support services and simplified deployments suitable for dynamic applications. In comparison, ClickHouse excels in high-speed data processing and cost-effectiveness, ideal for businesses needing immediate insights, emphasizing a hands-on approach and technical flexibility for efficient data performance and minimal maintenance.
Download ClickHouse vs. SingleStore Report
SingleStore's setup cost tends to be higher, reflecting robust enterprise features, while ClickHouse offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
SingleStore's setup cost tends to be higher, reflecting robust enterprise features, while ClickHouse offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to budget-conscious users.
SingleStore Logo
SingleStore Logo
Google Cloud Spanner
4.5 out of 5
Google Cloud Spanner users appreciate strong transaction processing and scalability. In comparison, SingleStore users value rapid query execution and analytical capabilities. Spanner requires minimal setup effort with reliable support, while SingleStore offers quicker deployment. For higher upfront costs, Spanner provides long-term ROI; SingleStore ensures quicker returns.
Download Google Cloud Spanner vs. SingleStore Report
Google Cloud Spanner has higher setup costs compared to SingleStore, which offers a more affordable initial setup solution. The cost difference in setup can significantly influence the total expenditure for businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Cloud Spanner has higher setup costs compared to SingleStore, which offers a more affordable initial setup solution. The cost difference in setup can significantly influence the total expenditure for businesses.
SingleStore Logo
SingleStore Logo
Yugabyte Platform
1 out of 5

For enterprises that want to use YugabyteDB in cloud-native environments at scale, Yugabyte Platform is an offering that delivers a streamlined operational experience, as well as comprehensive support and services.

View comparison
SingleStore Logo
Imply
4.0 out of 5
SingleStore Logo
Imply
4.0 out of 5
SingleStore impresses with its real-time data handling for swift transactional analytics, enticing enterprises looking for fast deployment. In comparison, Imply attracts those needing advanced visualization and flexible deployment, emphasizing detailed business intelligence at potentially higher costs due to its comprehensive analytics suite.
SingleStore offers a structured low-cost initial setup, while Imply presents a more customizable, though potentially higher, setup cost. SingleStore's pricing is straightforward, contrasting with Imply's flexible and possibly complex pricing model.
View comparison
Pricing
SingleStore offers a structured low-cost initial setup, while Imply presents a more customizable, though potentially higher, setup cost. SingleStore's pricing is straightforward, contrasting with Imply's flexible and possibly complex pricing model.

Related categories

Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Vector Databases
Open Source Databases