RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle aids efficient identity management, offering synchronization with Active Directory for seamless setups and enhancing security with two-factor authentication.


| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle | 1.1% |
| SailPoint Identity Security Cloud | 10.0% |
| Microsoft Entra ID | 6.9% |
| Other | 82.0% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity Management (IM) | May 5, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | May 5, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle vs One Identity Manager | May 5, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle vs Microsoft Entra ID | May 5, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle vs SailPoint Identity Security Cloud | May 5, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Entra ID | 4.3 | 6.9% | 95% | 277 interviewsAdd to research |
| SailPoint Identity Security Cloud | 4.1 | 10.0% | 97% | 72 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 49 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 30 |
| Large Enterprise | 42 |
RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle streamlines identity management from initiation to off-boarding, focusing on role-based access control and application integration. Despite requiring on-premise deployment, it provides advanced policy features for segregation of duties and access management. Performance issues arise with large file sizes, and there is limited integration with some third-party applications. Users benefit from custom forms, workflows, and an intuitive portal that eases the user's experience. While improvements are needed in database integration and multi-tenant capabilities, the solution remains popular for its auditing and certification support.
What are the key features of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is utilized in sectors managing digital identities, with deployment options on AWS, either on the cloud or on-premise. It assists organizations in handling joiner, mover, and leaver processes, adapting to business-specific needs while adding authentication layers to network access.
RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle was previously known as SecurID.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Senior Project Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I've used RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle for eight years; it's intuitive, strong in identity lifecycle management and policies, though performance lags with scale, and cloud adoption remains limited, but overall it's stable, scalable, and has excellent support. |
| Identity and Access Management at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is valuable for providing easy access based on roles through on-prem application connectors. However, it requires custom-built connectors, leading to high consultancy costs. We preferred SailPoint due to its existing connectors and global support. |
| Senior Project Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees | 2.5 | I like RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle for access certification, but it needs better out-of-the-box customization and multi-tenant cloud capabilities. Stability, costly non-multi-tenant setup, and poor customer service are significant drawbacks. |
| Manager at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.0 | I value the easy data collection, but the product misses key features, lacks customization, and requires Oracle. Support was inefficient, causing delays. It's best for smaller environments without advanced integration needs. |
| Senior Network Engineer at Arwentech | 3.5 | I use RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle for network authentication, valuing its OTP security and easy setup. It's stable and scalable. While I recommend it, database integration and Pakistani technical support need improvement. I rate it 7/10. |
| Identity and Access Management Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 2.5 | I find this solution beneficial for small organizations, as its role management and connectors aid user access governance. However, I believe its UI, workflow, and scalability, particularly the appliance version for large volumes, require significant improvement. |
| Contractor - Technical Support Specialist at a recruiting/HR firm with 501-1,000 employees | 4.0 | I've used this stable solution for basic two-factor authentication for over 10 years, which improved our security. Initial deployment was difficult, a mistake done in-house. It was expensive upfront, so I recommend vendor assistance for implementation. |
| Help Desk Manager with 51-200 employees | 5.0 | I find this 2FA solution highly stable and scalable, streamlining authentication and reducing support calls. Setup is straightforward, and customer service is excellent, despite minor installation flexibility limitations. |