Meraki Location Analytics delivers sophisticated trend monitoring and geofencing capabilities, aiding sectors like retail and airlines in network management and device location. Though expensive for mid-sized enterprises, its operational advantages are significant for many environments.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Meraki Location Analytics | 0.8% |
| Microsoft Power BI | 7.5% |
| Tableau Enterprise | 5.8% |
| Other | 85.9% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | BI (Business Intelligence) Tools | Jun 22, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Jun 22, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Meraki Location Analytics vs Microsoft Power BI | Jun 22, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Meraki Location Analytics vs Tableau Enterprise | Jun 22, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Meraki Location Analytics vs SAP Business Data Cloud | Jun 22, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Power BI | 4.0 | 7.5% | 93% | 331 interviewsAdd to research |
| Tableau Enterprise | 4.2 | 5.8% | 90% | 309 interviewsAdd to research |
With comprehensive tools for trend analysis, Meraki Location Analytics provides insights that support efficient network management. It proves essential for industries that rely on accurate device tracking and interference identification. While beneficial, improvements in pricing and technical support are desired by users. The platform plays a substantial role in diverse sectors, enabling the identification of traffic patterns, locating equipment, and managing network services effectively.
What are the top features of Meraki Location Analytics?Meraki Location Analytics finds applications in settings like retail, airlines, college campuses, and retirement businesses. It enables the analysis of traffic trends and locating devices, which is crucial in manufacturing facilities. Users deploying a full Meraki stack benefit from comprehensive data insights, supporting the management of missing devices and hotspot detection.
Ladbrokes, Neinver, Westwind School Division, The Salvation Army, Queensland Airports Limited
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Senior Analyst at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | We use Meraki Location Analytics to locate equipment in our manufacturing facilities. Its ease of use is valuable but lacks back-end visibility, requiring support for tasks. We switched due to issues with previous Cisco APs. |
| Director of Technology at a educational organization with 51-200 employees | 5.0 | I occasionally use Meraki Location Analytics to identify rogue hotspots and locate missing devices within a building. It works well with no specific areas needing improvement. Previously, I used Zorus, which was less capable than the current technology. |
| Network Engineer at a computer software company with 1-10 employees | 4.5 | I highly recommend Meraki Location Analytics. Its geofencing and easy device management are valuable, and it's stable and scalable. Setup is easy, though price negotiation can be tricky. It’s money well spent. |
| SR Solutions Engineer - Wireline at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | No summary available |
| Presales Engineer at Sencinet | 5.0 | I have used Meraki Location Analytics for five years. While initial setup is easy and it's less expensive for gold partners, technical support before implementation needs improvement. I rate it an eight out of ten. |
| President at www.virtualtechsolutionsusa.com | 5.0 | I find this solution excellent for trend monitoring, stability, scalability, and technical support, even outperforming competitors. However, my main concern is that the pricing is a significant pain point as it is quite expensive. |
Neutral
I use Location Analytics occasionally to identify a rogue hotspot or to find the last location of a missing device. In some cases, if there is an interference issue, I might be able to determine the location. However, such instances are unusual.
I use Location Analytics to identify rogue hotspots and find the last location of missing devices. It helps me in locating something within a building where it was last observed. In unusual cases of interference, it is potentially useful in identifying problem areas.
There are no specific areas for improvement as everything is working very well. I am happy with the current features.
Location Analytics is scalable. If I cover more buildings, I can increase connectivity in areas with weak connections.
Cisco support is good, but sometimes I have to wait to talk to someone compared to Cambium, where support is very responsive.
Neutral
I previously used Zorus, but the technology was replaced after six years. The older equipment was not as capable as the newer products.
As long as the building maps are laid out, setting up Location Analytics is easy, around an eight on a scale of one to ten.
The pricing and licensing for Meraki are good, and I would rate it as a nine out of ten.
I would advise that Meraki Location Analytics receives an overall rating of eight out of ten.
It is safe to say Cisco support could improve in terms of responsiveness compared to Cambium.
Location Analytics helps us identify sites' traffic patterns, the number of clients served, whether it's a public venue or not, etc. Location Analytics is a hybrid situation. With MDM, you have a dashboard on the cloud and an agent on each machine.
The MX has a mixture of cloud-based and onsite solutions. It depends on which product you're talking about, but it's a hybrid solution on the MDM. Location Analytics requires a full Meraki stack with firewall switches, which will give you full location analytics.
I like Location Analytics' geofencing features for devices. You can manage thousands of devices with just a push of a button and deploy applications in seconds. For example, in schools, you can deploy an app update for thousands of iPads in just two clicks.
I've been using Location Analytics for nine-plus years.
I've never had downtime.
Meraki Location Analytics is scalable.
The support team responds fast.
Deploying Location Analytics is super easy. The vendor handles the maintenance. You set the schedule for updates, and let them know if you want to automatically deploy firmware updates. It manages the device downtime, so everything doesn't go down at the same time. It does the update device by device to minimize downtime.
The biggest issue is negotiating the price with a client. That's the most complicated part, but the product is worth it. I'm not sure how much it costs, and it depends on how many licenses you need for the devices.
I rate Meraki Location analytics nine out of 10. I recommend it. It's money well spent.
We are a solution provider and as part of our offering, we resell Meraki products. The Meraki Location Analytics solution is one of the products that we offer to our customers. We do a fully managed solution.
My specific role is in design and our customers have a variety of use cases. For example, this can be used on a college campus where the equipment is installed in dorms for students to use. We have also worked on retirement businesses that have residents from all stages of life that live in different types of buildings. One of the features is a location service, where certain people can be easily located.
The most valuable feature depends on the use case and who is making use of the services. In general, it is helpful because it allows administrators to see where the Wi-Fi and network services are being most used.
This product is easy to maintain. This is a fix it and forget it solution.
I would like to see all of the features included in a single package. As it is now, the only downfall is that if a customer doesn't buy everything, and they only buy the best parts of it, then they are missing out. This means that later, they have to invest in add-ons.
I have been working with Meraki products since Cisco took them over, several years ago. I took the training just before the merger and I've been certified since that time.
This is a very stable product.
This is a really good solution for both small and mid-sized customers.
When it comes to scalability, you have capacity versus coverage. Capacity is where, when a person walks into a building a uses the Wi-Fi network, all of their devices connect. Capacity in this context refers to how many devices a person uses. This includes devices like iPhones, tablets, other cell phones, laptops, and others. This has to be sized properly and Meraki does a good job of that.
I have dealt with Cisco technical support during design, but we have an entire management team that deals with support when it comes to fixing problems.
We have sold other similar solutions in the past.
This product is very straightforward to set up.
This solution has some equipment that has to be installed on-site but the gateways are on the cloud.
Our team usually works with one on-site individual.
Meraki products are very affordable. They have different tiers of pricing including one-year, three-year, five-year, seven-year, and ten-year. The licensing is flexible and depends on what it is that the customer wants.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
The product's technical support services need improvement.
The technical support before implementation could be better for premium partners.
The initial setup process is easy.
The product is less expensive compared to other vendors for gold partners.
We primarily use the solution for analysis and trend monitoring.
The trend monitoring has been a very useful aspect for us. That's the most key feature, depending on what industry you're in. If you're in retail or you're into airlines and stuff like that, where trends matter, then this is a big, big deal It does it well, and it does it better than anybody else in the industry.
Everything's updated, all of it, quite well. It updates just like your computer system will update. If you have a cloud solution, everything's going to be updated in the cloud. You've actually got people sitting there, professional people that are patching, updating, and monitoring, doing all these types of things so you don't have any downtime.
The solution scales very, very well.
Technical support has always been very good.
The pricing is a pain point for us. It's a bit expensive. I would like to still see it come down, as many companies just don't have the budgets for it right now. Mid-sized companies in particular just don't have that kind of money sometimes. If it comes down a little bit, they're going to hit a lot more companies and take a bigger market share.
The stability has been very good overall. It's regularly updated and there are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. It's been quite reliable and the performance is good.
The solution scales extremely well. If a company needs to expand, it's not a problem. They can do so with ease.
Technical support is rock-solid. They are very helpful and responsive. We are quite satisfied with the level of attention we get when we need their help.
We've used different BI tools such as Power BI.
There are major differences between the two solutions as they just don't have some of the features. For instance, the trending and things like that, it's entirely different. It doesn't do any of those things as well as Cisco does. There are a lot of little things, that just aren't as good.
The pricing could be less expensive. They should work on their price points. However, since it is such a well-polished system, you can see why they charge what they do.
The pricing is different for each company, it depends on a few factors, including the number of users, for example. It's hard to give an exact price as it moves around and changes according to variables. That said, it is possible to work with them to get a reasonable price in some cases.
We're Cisco partners and resellers.
When Meraki came out, it was kind of like Cisco routers and stuff, however, they went to the air. Device Management just came out not that long ago. We've been using its analytics pretty much with every deal now. Since lockdown, everybody's got to either bring their own devices or the company has to give them phones.
If you can afford this solution, it's worth every dime in terms of what you get out of it.
Companies, if they decide to implement the solution, are going to have to make a lot of choices. Do they have the people they feel that they can do this with? Do they need to use part of the analytics? Or not? If they do, then do they know what they're looking for - for example, what trends are they trying to spot? It can get overwhelming.
That said, at the end of the day, a company will have a dashboard that they can go into and manipulate if they want to and can change things or just monitor on their own.
With the dashboard, you can see what's going on. If you do on-premises, you're also going to have to focus on going to patch and fix and do all the things that need to be done to keep it running smoothly, and you'll need to follow alerts to see if something's up or something like that. The advantage of the cloud is that a lot of this is done for you and you won't have to worry about manual patching, et cetera.
I'd rate the solution at a ten out of ten overall. We've been quite happy with the product.
