Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo

Top 10 Lacework FortiCNAPP Alternatives

Vendor: Fortinet
4.3 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Lacework FortiCNAPP Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Lacework FortiCNAPP based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Cloudflare, Wiz, and Microsoft Defender for Cloud. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Lacework FortiCNAPP surpasses its competitors by offering advanced cloud security and compliance automation, providing unparalleled scalability and insight into complex environments that ensure robust protection while optimizing operational efficiency for businesses.

Fortinet Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Fortinet, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Cloudflare
4.3 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Cloudflare
4.3 out of 5
Cloudflare enhances performance and security with extensive caching, DDoS protection, flexible SSL, and CDN capabilities. In comparison, Lacework FortiCNAPP excels in security compliance, offering insights into threats and vulnerabilities. Cloudflare’s flexible deployment contrasts with Lacework’s focus on detailed security and compliance features.
Download Cloudflare vs. Lacework FortiCNAPP Report
Cloudflare offers a cost-effective setup, while Lacework FortiCNAPP requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Cloudflare offers a cost-effective setup, while Lacework FortiCNAPP requires a higher initial investment.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP excels in compliance reporting and user-friendly setup. In comparison, Wiz focuses on deep risk analysis through its Security Graph. A tech buyer might choose Lacework FortiCNAPP for its straightforward pricing, while Wiz offers long-term cloud management benefits.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Wiz Report
Lacework FortiCNAPP involves moderate setup costs, while Wiz impresses with lower initial expenses, highlighting a cost-effective choice.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP involves moderate setup costs, while Wiz impresses with lower initial expenses, highlighting a cost-effective choice.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
4.0 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP excels in ease of use and compliance automation. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud integrates seamlessly with Microsoft products. Lacework's alert filtering could improve, while Microsoft Defender's pricing can be complex, though it offers strong ROI with Microsoft's suite.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Lacework FortiCNAPP has a more straightforward setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, which offers additional complexity and flexibility, highlighting a key difference in their initial investment requirements.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP has a more straightforward setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, which offers additional complexity and flexibility, highlighting a key difference in their initial investment requirements.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Prisma Cloud's strengths include seamless multi-cloud security integration and comprehensive vulnerability management. In comparison, Lacework FortiCNAPP excels with anomaly detection and efficient security log processing. A tech buyer might choose Prisma for its robust security features and Lacework for its proactive threat detection capabilities.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers competitive setup costs, while Lacework FortiCNAPP is recognized for potentially higher initial investments.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers competitive setup costs, while Lacework FortiCNAPP is recognized for potentially higher initial investments.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Darktrace offers advanced AI-driven threat detection, making it ideal for enhancing visibility and preventing threats. In comparison, Lacework FortiCNAPP focuses on anomaly detection and security compliance, providing streamlined alert management beneficial for organizations prioritizing efficient resource allocation.
Download Darktrace vs. Lacework FortiCNAPP Report
Darktrace requires moderate setup costs known for efficient deployment, while Lacework FortiCNAPP offers a budget-friendly setup emphasizing ease of use, making them distinct in initial cost expectations for users considering these cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Darktrace requires moderate setup costs known for efficient deployment, while Lacework FortiCNAPP offers a budget-friendly setup emphasizing ease of use, making them distinct in initial cost expectations for users considering these cybersecurity solutions.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
4.4 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP excels in comprehensive compliance and data ingestion for security, appealing to those needing machine learning for anomaly detection. In comparison, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers real-time detection and automated responses, ideal for tech buyers seeking advanced threat detection and integration.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Report
Lacework FortiCNAPP involves a streamlined setup process, whereas SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security features a more comprehensive initial configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP involves a streamlined setup process, whereas SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security features a more comprehensive initial configuration.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Snyk
4.0 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Snyk
4.0 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP excels in anomaly detection, cloud security, and compliance integration. In comparison, Snyk emphasizes vulnerability detection and simplicity. For buyers, FortiCNAPP is ideal for security insights, while Snyk suits developers needing code integration and notifications.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Snyk Report
Lacework FortiCNAPP involves lower setup costs, while Snyk's initial configuration requires a more significant investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP involves lower setup costs, while Snyk's initial configuration requires a more significant investment.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Veracode
4.1 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Veracode
4.1 out of 5
Veracode offers comprehensive security scans and compliance, making it suitable for companies needing robust analysis. In comparison, Lacework FortiCNAPP focuses on simplifying cloud security management and anomaly detection, appealing to those prioritizing streamlined cloud protection and actionable insights.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Veracode Report
Veracode has a straightforward setup cost that appeals to businesses with tight budgets, while Lacework FortiCNAPP presents a higher upfront investment, offering advanced features for enterprises prioritizing security management.
View comparison
Pricing
Veracode has a straightforward setup cost that appeals to businesses with tight budgets, while Lacework FortiCNAPP presents a higher upfront investment, offering advanced features for enterprises prioritizing security management.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Qualys VMDR
4.1 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Qualys VMDR
4.1 out of 5
Qualys VMDR offers extensive vulnerability management with reliable scanning and patching, appealing to diverse environments. In comparison, Lacework FortiCNAPP targets cloud security, emphasizing anomaly detection and compliance, suitable for organizations focusing on public cloud services. Each solution presents unique strengths for specific security needs.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Qualys VMDR Report
Qualys VMDR offers a predictable setup cost, whereas Lacework FortiCNAPP has a variable setup cost influenced by custom configurations and requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR offers a predictable setup cost, whereas Lacework FortiCNAPP has a variable setup cost influenced by custom configurations and requirements.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Tenable Nessus
4.2 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Tenable Nessus
4.2 out of 5
Tenable Nessus is noted for its comprehensive vulnerability scanning and cost-effectiveness, ideal for budget-conscious organizations. In comparison, Lacework FortiCNAPP excels in multi-cloud support and anomaly detection, making it suitable for cloud-centric security needs. Each solution caters to specific security requirements.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Tenable Nessus Report
Tenable Nessus offers a cost-effective setup, while Lacework FortiCNAPP has a higher initial setup cost. The disparity in setup expenses highlights their differing approaches to pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable Nessus offers a cost-effective setup, while Lacework FortiCNAPP has a higher initial setup cost. The disparity in setup expenses highlights their differing approaches to pricing.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform
4.2 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP appeals with ease of use, machine learning-based security features, and cost-efficiency through automation. In comparison, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange entices with seamless VPN, private access, and comprehensive cloud-based protection, offering distinct advantages and some high costs for extensive feature sets.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Report
Lacework FortiCNAPP may have a higher setup cost, ideal for those seeking comprehensive coverage, while the Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform offers competitive setup pricing, appealing to those prioritizing cost-effectiveness.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP may have a higher setup cost, ideal for those seeking comprehensive coverage, while the Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform offers competitive setup pricing, appealing to those prioritizing cost-effectiveness.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Tenable Security Center
4.1 out of 5
Tenable Security Center prioritizes vulnerability scanning with detailed dashboards, asset discovery, and vulnerability prioritization. In comparison, Lacework FortiCNAPP focuses on anomaly detection, security compliance, and continuous cloud monitoring, making it suitable for cloud-centric organizations seeking insights into compliance posture.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Tenable Security Center Report
Tenable Security Center offers a straightforward setup with minimal cost, whereas Lacework FortiCNAPP involves more complex and potentially higher setup expenses, highlighting distinct differences in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable Security Center offers a straightforward setup with minimal cost, whereas Lacework FortiCNAPP involves more complex and potentially higher setup expenses, highlighting distinct differences in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
AWS Security Hub
3.8 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
AWS Security Hub
3.8 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP excels in machine learning anomaly detection and seamless integration with tools like Slack, while AWS Security Hub provides excellent AWS and third-party integrations. In comparison, AWS Security Hub offers budget-friendly pricing, and Lacework ensures strong support and flexible cloud deployments.
Download AWS Security Hub vs. Lacework FortiCNAPP Report
Lacework FortiCNAPP exhibits a straightforward setup process, while AWS Security Hub often involves higher initial configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP exhibits a straightforward setup process, while AWS Security Hub often involves higher initial configuration.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
4.1 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP is sought for its ease of use and compliance reporting. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security provides unmatched threat detection. Buyers might prefer Lacework for its comprehensive compliance features or choose CrowdStrike for its premium threat management capabilities.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs. Lacework FortiCNAPP Report
Lacework FortiCNAPP offers straightforward initial setup costs, while CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security provides more competitive startup pricing. FortiCNAPP emphasizes simplicity, whereas Falcon Cloud Security focuses on cost-effectiveness.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP offers straightforward initial setup costs, while CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security provides more competitive startup pricing. FortiCNAPP emphasizes simplicity, whereas Falcon Cloud Security focuses on cost-effectiveness.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
AWS GuardDuty
4.1 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
AWS GuardDuty
4.1 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP emphasizes ease of use and multi-cloud vulnerability monitoring. In comparison, Amazon GuardDuty excels with AWS integration and threat detection capabilities. Lacework users benefit from comprehensive compliance reporting while GuardDuty's automated protection aids those prioritizing AWS-native solutions.
Download AWS GuardDuty vs. Lacework FortiCNAPP Report
Lacework FortiCNAPP offers a competitive setup cost, while AWS GuardDuty provides a straightforward approach with easier initial expenses. The difference lies in the balance between features and affordability that each platform presents.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP offers a competitive setup cost, while AWS GuardDuty provides a straightforward approach with easier initial expenses. The difference lies in the balance between features and affordability that each platform presents.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Illumio
4.0 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Illumio
4.0 out of 5
Illumio offers intuitive configuration and segmentation to minimize lateral threat movement. In comparison, Lacework FortiCNAPP delivers advanced threat detection and comprehensive visibility, making it ideal for proactive threat management. Tech buyers might choose Illumio for quick deployment and competitive pricing, while prioritizing robust threat management may favor Lacework FortiCNAPP.
Download Illumio vs. Lacework FortiCNAPP Report
Illumio has a straightforward setup cost with minimal initial investment, providing simplicity. In contrast, Lacework FortiCNAPP demands higher upfront fees, reflecting its comprehensive features and robust security capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Illumio has a straightforward setup cost with minimal initial investment, providing simplicity. In contrast, Lacework FortiCNAPP demands higher upfront fees, reflecting its comprehensive features and robust security capabilities.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Orca Security
4.5 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Orca Security
4.5 out of 5
Lacework provides superior compliance reports and machine learning detection, appealing to organizations prioritizing detailed alerts. In comparison, Orca Security's agentless deployment and cloud visibility attract those seeking simplified setup and comprehensive insights, while its strategic pricing benefits larger scale operations.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Orca Security Report
Lacework FortiCNAPP has a higher setup cost, whereas Orca Security offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to cost-conscious customers.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP has a higher setup cost, whereas Orca Security offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to cost-conscious customers.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
JFrog Xray
4.0 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
JFrog Xray
4.0 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP offers automated compliance checks and straightforward deployment, attracting cloud-native businesses with competitive pricing. In comparison, JFrog Xray provides deep vulnerability scanning and flexible configurations, appealing to DevOps environments despite potentially higher initial costs due to its extensive features.
Download JFrog Xray vs. Lacework FortiCNAPP Report
Lacework FortiCNAPP often requires a higher initial setup cost, whereas JFrog Xray offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a key difference in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP often requires a higher initial setup cost, whereas JFrog Xray offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a key difference in initial investment.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Aqua Cloud Security Platform
4.0 out of 5
Aqua Cloud Security Platform offers comprehensive vulnerability management and container security, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Lacework FortiCNAPP features superior anomaly detection and automated threat protection, justifying its higher cost for those prioritizing advanced security and integration capabilities.
Download Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs. Lacework FortiCNAPP Report
Aqua Cloud Security Platform has a notably lower setup cost compared to Lacework FortiCNAPP, which offers advanced features but comes with higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Aqua Cloud Security Platform has a notably lower setup cost compared to Lacework FortiCNAPP, which offers advanced features but comes with higher initial expenses.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP
4.3 out of 5
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP emphasizes centralized firewall management and compliance, with comprehensive IAM roles, while Lacework FortiCNAPP excels in customizable alerts and real-time anomaly detection. In comparison, CloudGuard is ideal for seamless security management, and Lacework provides strong insights into compliance status.
Download Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. Lacework FortiCNAPP Report
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP focuses on flexible initial setup costs while Lacework FortiCNAPP offers a more streamlined pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP focuses on flexible initial setup costs while Lacework FortiCNAPP offers a more streamlined pricing structure.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Trivy
4.3 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Trivy
4.3 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP excels in compliance and anomaly detection, offering comprehensive security management with high customization. In comparison, Trivy, as a free open-source tool, prioritizes simplicity, making it ideal for easy integration and deployment, favoring organizations seeking cost-effective vulnerability scanning solutions.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Trivy Report
Lacework FortiCNAPP requires more setup cost, while Trivy offers a cost-efficient setup option, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP requires more setup cost, while Trivy offers a cost-efficient setup option, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Trend Vision One - Cloud Security
4.3 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP excels in multi-cloud integration, leveraging ease of use and machine learning for anomaly detection. In comparison, Trend Vision One - Cloud Security focuses on comprehensive dashboards and AWS support. Both cater to different needs, enabling tech buyers to choose based on priority features.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Report
Lacework FortiCNAPP involves higher initial setup costs compared to Trend Vision One - Cloud Security, which offers a more affordable setup, positioning each solution distinctly in terms of budgetary requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP involves higher initial setup costs compared to Trend Vision One - Cloud Security, which offers a more affordable setup, positioning each solution distinctly in terms of budgetary requirements.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
SUSE NeuVector
3.9 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
SUSE NeuVector
3.9 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP excels in automation, compliance, and multi-cloud adaptation, appealing to those prioritizing ease of use and adaptable monitoring. In comparison, SUSE NeuVector offers robust runtime security and malware protection, ideal for tech buyers focusing on comprehensive container security.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. SUSE NeuVector Report
Lacework FortiCNAPP has a setup cost noted for scalability, while SUSE NeuVector is characterized by its straightforward deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP has a setup cost noted for scalability, while SUSE NeuVector is characterized by its straightforward deployment.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Sysdig Secure
4.1 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Sysdig Secure
4.1 out of 5
Sysdig Secure offers competitive pricing and strong support, appealing to cost-focused firms. In comparison, Lacework FortiCNAPP excels in automation and analytics, justifying its higher cost for businesses prioritizing adaptive security measures. Each solution caters to distinct organizational security needs effectively.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Sysdig Secure Report
Sysdig Secure has a straightforward setup cost, while Lacework FortiCNAPP incurs higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Sysdig Secure has a straightforward setup cost, while Lacework FortiCNAPP incurs higher initial expenses.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
4.1 out of 5
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security focuses on vulnerability management and compliance automation, providing control over Kubernetes clusters. In comparison, Lacework FortiCNAPP emphasizes runtime protection and anomaly detection, appealing to those prioritizing multi-cloud integration and advanced security functionalities.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes Report
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes has a high setup cost, while Lacework FortiCNAPP offers a more economical setup cost, highlighting a significant price distinction between these two Kubernetes security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes has a high setup cost, while Lacework FortiCNAPP offers a more economical setup cost, highlighting a significant price distinction between these two Kubernetes security solutions.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Amazon Inspector
4.1 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Amazon Inspector
4.1 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP offers ease of use and machine learning for threat prioritization. In comparison, Amazon Inspector provides automated vulnerability assessments with strong AWS integration. Lacework supports private cloud deployments, whereas Amazon Inspector is praised for affordable tiered pricing.
Download Amazon Inspector vs. Lacework FortiCNAPP Report
Lacework FortiCNAPP has a higher setup cost compared to Amazon Inspector, which offers a more budget-friendly option. This cost difference may influence selection based on the initial budget allocation for security tool setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP has a higher setup cost compared to Amazon Inspector, which offers a more budget-friendly option. This cost difference may influence selection based on the initial budget allocation for security tool setup.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Tenable Cloud Security
4.2 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP excels in seamless integration and automation, appealing to buyers prioritizing efficiency. In comparison, Tenable Cloud Security offers comprehensive vulnerability management, attracting those who value detailed risk analysis. Lacework ensures quick deployment, whereas Tenable provides asset visualization and extensive tool integration.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Tenable Cloud Security Report
Lacework FortiCNAPP setup cost is lower, accommodating smaller budgets, whereas Tenable Cloud Security offers more comprehensive setup features, justifying a higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP setup cost is lower, accommodating smaller budgets, whereas Tenable Cloud Security offers more comprehensive setup features, justifying a higher initial expense.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
Morphisec offers robust endpoint protection with deterministic attack prevention and memory morphing, ensuring efficient threat management through its signatureless operation. In comparison, Lacework FortiCNAPP excels in compliance and anomaly detection, delivering context-rich alerts and continuous monitoring for comprehensive cloud security.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Morphisec Report
Morphisec's setup cost is minimal and straightforward, while Lacework FortiCNAPP presents a more complex and higher setup cost, highlighting a significant difference in implementation effort and initial financial investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Morphisec's setup cost is minimal and straightforward, while Lacework FortiCNAPP presents a more complex and higher setup cost, highlighting a significant difference in implementation effort and initial financial investment between the two solutions.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management
4.6 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP offers robust anomaly detection and integration with Jira, ideal for public cloud deployment. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management excels in asset management and comprehensive tool integration, benefiting hybrid environments. Tech buyers should consider their specific needs and deployment preferences.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Lacework FortiCNAPP offers a straightforward setup process with competitive costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides an extensive configuration requiring higher initial investment, making Lacework's simplicity a notable differentiator.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP offers a straightforward setup process with competitive costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides an extensive configuration requiring higher initial investment, making Lacework's simplicity a notable differentiator.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Wiz Code
1 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Wiz Code
1 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP provides strong cloud security and competitive pricing, appealing with integration benefits. In comparison, Wiz Code’s extensive features and deep analytics make it an attractive option for those prioritizing broad security coverage despite higher initial costs.
Lacework FortiCNAPP has an upfront setup cost, while Wiz Code offers a more streamlined approach without initial fees. The difference in setup costs highlights contrasting budget considerations for businesses evaluating these security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP has an upfront setup cost, while Wiz Code offers a more streamlined approach without initial fees. The difference in setup costs highlights contrasting budget considerations for businesses evaluating these security solutions.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Qualys TotalCloud
4.4 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Qualys TotalCloud
4.4 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP offers user-friendly anomaly detection and strong compliance features, ideal for reducing alert noise. In comparison, Qualys TotalCloud provides a comprehensive dashboard and asset management, suitable for managing risks in larger organizations.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Qualys TotalCloud Report
Lacework FortiCNAPP offers competitive setup costs compared to Qualys TotalCloud, which tends to have a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP offers competitive setup costs compared to Qualys TotalCloud, which tends to have a higher initial investment.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Fortra's Alert Logic MDR
4.0 out of 5
Fortra's Alert Logic MDR excels in customer support and pricing with real-time threat detection, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Lacework FortiCNAPP offers advanced cloud-native protection and extensive data visibility, attracting those requiring a robust feature set and long-term security investment.
Download Fortra's Alert Logic MDR vs. Lacework FortiCNAPP Report
Fortra's Alert Logic MDR involves a complex setup cost, while Lacework FortiCNAPP offers a more streamlined process, highlighting notable differences in implementation demands.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortra's Alert Logic MDR involves a complex setup cost, while Lacework FortiCNAPP offers a more streamlined process, highlighting notable differences in implementation demands.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Rapid7 InsightCloudSec
3.6 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP's security automation attracts buyers minimizing risks efficiently, offering straightforward deployment with cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Rapid7 InsightCloudSec appeals to those prioritizing compliance through its robust features, providing significant long-term value, albeit with a more complex deployment process and higher upfront costs.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Rapid7 InsightCloudSec Report
Lacework FortiCNAPP has a straightforward setup cost, while Rapid7 InsightCloudSec offers a more complex and variable pricing for setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP has a straightforward setup cost, while Rapid7 InsightCloudSec offers a more complex and variable pricing for setup.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Upwind
4.8 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Upwind
4.8 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP offers robust security analytics and cost-effective solutions with streamlined deployment and responsive support. In comparison, Upwind excels with advanced threat detection, seamless cloud integration, and substantial ROI for complex environments, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive functionalities despite higher costs.
Download Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. Upwind Report
Lacework FortiCNAPP incurs higher initial setup costs, while Upwind offers a more cost-effective setup. Lacework prioritizes advanced features, whereas Upwind emphasizes affordability in its pricing strategy.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP incurs higher initial setup costs, while Upwind offers a more cost-effective setup. Lacework prioritizes advanced features, whereas Upwind emphasizes affordability in its pricing strategy.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Google Cloud Security Command Center
3.7 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP attracts tech buyers with its cost-effectiveness and intuitive deployment. In comparison, Google Cloud Security Command Center appeals to those needing comprehensive features and deeper insights, aligning well with Google's ecosystem for a robust, integrated security experience.
Download Google Cloud Security Command Center vs. Lacework FortiCNAPP Report
Lacework FortiCNAPP offers a simpler setup with competitive pricing, while Google Cloud Security Command Center requires complex configuration, often resulting in higher initial setup costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP offers a simpler setup with competitive pricing, while Google Cloud Security Command Center requires complex configuration, often resulting in higher initial setup costs.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Uptycs
4.0 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Uptycs
4.0 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP offers robust integration features with intuitive deployment, appealing to those in complex environments. In comparison, Uptycs excels in threat detection and analytics, making it suitable for organizations prioritizing comprehensive security insights despite higher initial costs.
Lacework FortiCNAPP setup cost involves straightforward pricing, while Uptycs requires careful cost evaluation due to its varied packages.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP setup cost involves straightforward pricing, while Uptycs requires careful cost evaluation due to its varied packages.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
BMC Helix Cloud Security
4.0 out of 5
BMC Helix Cloud Security appeals with its emphasis on compliance and competitive pricing. In comparison, Lacework FortiCNAPP attracts with its advanced threat detection features. BMC's superior customer support contrasts with Lacework's robust analytics capabilities, catering to diverse organizational priorities.
Download BMC Helix Cloud Security vs. Lacework FortiCNAPP Report
BMC Helix Cloud Security offers competitive setup costs, while Lacework FortiCNAPP involves higher initial expenses, emphasizing affordability for BMC compared to the comprehensive setup pricing of Lacework.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC Helix Cloud Security offers competitive setup costs, while Lacework FortiCNAPP involves higher initial expenses, emphasizing affordability for BMC compared to the comprehensive setup pricing of Lacework.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Panoptica
1 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Panoptica
1 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP excels with advanced threat detection and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Panoptica offers extensive integration with third-party applications and flexible policy management. Lacework's pricing is customer-centric, while Panoptica's comprehensive features justify its higher investment for diverse environments.
Lacework FortiCNAPP has moderate setup costs, while Panoptica offers a more flexible pricing model.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP has moderate setup costs, while Panoptica offers a more flexible pricing model.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
AccuKnox Platform
3.0 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
AccuKnox Platform
3.0 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP excels in support and cost efficiency, offering strong security analytics and a quick setup. In comparison, AccuKnox Platform's robust feature set and real-time anomaly detection, paired with flexible deployment, make it appealing despite higher initial costs.
Lacework FortiCNAPP has an initial setup cost while AccuKnox Platform is free to set up. The significant cost difference positions Lacework FortiCNAPP as a higher upfront investment compared to the cost-efficient AccuKnox Platform.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP has an initial setup cost while AccuKnox Platform is free to set up. The significant cost difference positions Lacework FortiCNAPP as a higher upfront investment compared to the cost-efficient AccuKnox Platform.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Netskope Public Cloud Security
1 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP stands out for its scalable cloud workload protection and competitive pricing, ideal for those emphasizing compliance automation and customer service. In comparison, Netskope Public Cloud Security offers advanced threat prevention and deeper integrations, appealing to organizations prioritizing long-term security gains.
Lacework FortiCNAPP involves minimal setup costs, making it an economical option, while Netskope Public Cloud Security may incur higher initial expenses, highlighting a key differentiation in their pricing structures.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP involves minimal setup costs, making it an economical option, while Netskope Public Cloud Security may incur higher initial expenses, highlighting a key differentiation in their pricing structures.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Plerion
1 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Plerion
1 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP offers user-friendly design and comprehensive support, suited for those valuing ease of use. In comparison, Plerion provides advanced features and cutting-edge AI integration, ideal for tech buyers prioritizing robust capabilities and deeper functionality despite higher initial costs.
Lacework FortiCNAPP offers a straightforward setup process with minimal costs, while Plerion's setup involves a more complex and costlier approach, highlighting distinct differences in ease and affordability of implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP offers a straightforward setup process with minimal costs, while Plerion's setup involves a more complex and costlier approach, highlighting distinct differences in ease and affordability of implementation.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Lightspin
1 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Lightspin
1 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP's appeal lies in comprehensive threat detection and clear pricing, making it attractive for those prioritizing affordability and support. In comparison, Lightspin's strength is in advanced risk management and insightful security analysis, appealing to buyers seeking superior long-term security benefits.
Lacework FortiCNAPP's setup cost is significantly higher than Lightspin, impacting user considerations when comparing initial expenses for these security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP's setup cost is significantly higher than Lightspin, impacting user considerations when comparing initial expenses for these security solutions.
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Caveonix
1 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP Logo
Caveonix
1 out of 5
Lacework FortiCNAPP excels in pricing and support with robust threat detection, ideal for cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Caveonix provides detailed risk management and reporting, appealing to enterprises valuing comprehensive compliance. Lacework FortiCNAPP's easy deployment contrasts with Caveonix's dedicated customer service.
Lacework FortiCNAPP has initial setup costs that may be higher, focusing on robust security features, while Caveonix offers a more budget-friendly setup, concentrating on risk management.
View comparison
Pricing
Lacework FortiCNAPP has initial setup costs that may be higher, focusing on robust security features, while Caveonix offers a more budget-friendly setup, concentrating on risk management.

Related categories

Vulnerability Management
Container Security
Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)