Fast data transfer and quick setup for new servers
Product version discussed: Hitachi Thin Image Advanced
Summary
I use Hitachi Thin Image to efficiently image and test new servers. Its fast data transfer capabilities are beneficial, though improvements in the management software, especially Ops Center, are needed. Previously, I worked with Dell EMC for similar tasks.
Pros
"The most beneficial feature is its fast data transfer capabilities."
Cons
"Hitachi needs to improve their management software, especially the Ops Center. "
What is our primary use case?
We use Thin Image to image new test servers, create new development servers, and test new servers. It is also used for fast data transfer to new servers.
How has it helped my organization?
Hitachi Thin Image allows us to quickly create new data snapshots. It speeds up synchronization and setup tasks significantly, which is essential when making new services and transferring data to new servers. For big databases, we rely on Thin Image.
What is most valuable?
The most beneficial feature is its fast data transfer capabilities.
What needs improvement?
Hitachi needs to improve their management software, especially the Ops Center. Better management could enhance the overall experience.
How are customer service and support?
Their technical support could be improved to be quicker, especially the first level of support.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before Hitachi Thin Image, I worked with Dell EMC.
How was the initial setup?
The implementation of Thin Image is fast and straightforward. It typically takes about fifteen minutes to set up, which is quicker than other solutions like Shadow Image that take a longer time.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Hitachi Thin Image is not cheap, yet the price is competitive compared to other companies like Dell.
What other advice do I have?
Thin Image is suitable for both small and big companies. It is highly recommended for its fast performance.
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.