No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages vs Windows Server 2025 (Windows Server 2025) | Support by SupportedImages comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS...
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
466th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Windows Server 2025 (Window...
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
537th
Average Rating
7.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

AN
Platform Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Hosting python learning apps has become smooth and supports secure, low‑maintenance deployment
The best feature Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages offers is stability, which stands out to me the most. Stability is the main thing that stands out for me. Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages has positively impacted my organization. Earlier, when we were working in a startup, we deployed almost all the applications on Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages because it was stable. We mostly used Linux to host any application because it is easy to manage, and Linux is made for application deployment rather than Windows, making it much easier to deploy and manage all the deployed applications. It is user-friendly if somebody is into DevOps. Right now, I do not have any metrics to share, but as I said earlier, it gives very good stability and performance.
Jörg Köhler - PeerSpot reviewer
Owner at AvalisNT AG
Modern desktop delivery has become smoother and integration with current clients works reliably
In Switzerland, my clients, particularly in the banking sector, are cautious about moving data to the cloud due to legal concerns about US access. Therefore, some companies prefer keeping their data on premises to avoid compromising security.Currently, I primarily work on-premises, operating exclusively within shared hardware data centers and not utilizing cloud services such as Azure or AWS. We have experimented with Azure for some testing installations, but the overall costs associated with cloud services raise concerns. While we employ cloud solutions for backup, our infrastructure remains on-premises. For the product itself, Windows Server 2025 (Windows Server 2025) | Support by SupportedImages earns a solid rating of seven or eight from me because it is user-friendly to work with. My main frustration lies in the mandatory updates and newly introduced security features that complicate third-party software operations.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages is easy to learn, which is my favorite part about it, as the commands are very easy."
"The best feature Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages offers is stability, which stands out to me the most."
"Regarding value for money, organizations that provide services typically use Ubuntu as their primary OS, which is secure, compatible, and developer-friendly, allowing our DevOps team to utilize it effectively for daily deployments and configurations."
"The biggest advantage I find in Windows Server 2025 is that it is very user-friendly."
"What I appreciate about Windows Server 2025 (Windows Server 2025) | Support by SupportedImages is the full solution Microsoft provides, especially when it comes to the cloud part and security, with their Microsoft total solutions."
"A significant benefit of Windows Server 2025 is its smoother integration with Windows 11, particularly in network environments."
 

Cons

"Despite mentioning many advantages, an area for improvement in Ubuntu is its application support, as it lacks many GUI-friendly applications that are available on Windows or macOS, which limits usability for tasks requiring specific software."
"There are a few applications that are not easy to deploy on Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages, so we need to have some workarounds for that."
"Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages could be improved because most people are using Ubuntu 24 right now, as it is the latest version on the market and has fewer vulnerabilities compared to Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages."
"The main disadvantage of Windows Server 2025 (Windows Server 2025) | Support by SupportedImages is pricing, as customers choose some Linux versions, which are open-source editions."
"Regarding security, I do not agree with Windows Server 2025 (Windows Server 2025) | Support by SupportedImages because I believe Linux is the best for securing servers."
"The changes that Microsoft made with the introduction of Windows Server 2025 (Windows Server 2025) | Support by SupportedImages did not enhance our security; rather, they made it harder due to uncommunicated security features being activated."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages?
We are going with the open source version and are not purchasing Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages.
What needs improvement with Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages?
There are a few applications that are not easy to deploy on Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages, so we need to have some workarounds for that. For example, certain appli...
What needs improvement with Windows Server 2025 (Windows Server 2025) | Support by SupportedImages?
The main disadvantage of Windows Server 2025 (Windows Server 2025) | Support by SupportedImages is pricing, as customers choose some Linux versions, which are open-source editions. There are some c...
What is your primary use case for Windows Server 2025 (Windows Server 2025) | Support by SupportedImages?
Windows Server 2025 (Windows Server 2025) | Support by SupportedImages is mainly used by our client for application hosting. I don't work extensively with the identity management part, but I do...
What advice do you have for others considering Windows Server 2025 (Windows Server 2025) | Support by SupportedImages?
We are working as a partner with Microsoft. We have different customers with various deployment styles, but our focus is mainly on the cloud. We work in majority with enterprise customers as well a...
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Dice, Upbound, Tulip Interfaces and others in AWS Marketplace. Updated: October 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.