No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages vs Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS...
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
466th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Windows Server 2016 (Window...
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
508th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

AN
Platform Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Hosting python learning apps has become smooth and supports secure, low‑maintenance deployment
The best feature Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages offers is stability, which stands out to me the most. Stability is the main thing that stands out for me. Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages has positively impacted my organization. Earlier, when we were working in a startup, we deployed almost all the applications on Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages because it was stable. We mostly used Linux to host any application because it is easy to manage, and Linux is made for application deployment rather than Windows, making it much easier to deploy and manage all the deployed applications. It is user-friendly if somebody is into DevOps. Right now, I do not have any metrics to share, but as I said earlier, it gives very good stability and performance.
RP
CEO at Ruby Mills Ltd
Familiar platform has supported reliable on-premise file sharing and directory services
I am not currently using virtual machines, but I intend to switch over from VMware, and if I do, I may use the Shielded Virtual Machines feature. I am not using the Nano Server product, so I cannot comment on its impact on reducing server footprint in my organization. I am not working with Windows Containers for managing application deployment. I do not know about the integration capability of Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages with Microsoft Azure, as I do not use the cloud. I would give Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages a rating of eight on a scale from zero to ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages is easy to learn, which is my favorite part about it, as the commands are very easy."
"The best feature Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages offers is stability, which stands out to me the most."
"Regarding value for money, organizations that provide services typically use Ubuntu as their primary OS, which is secure, compatible, and developer-friendly, allowing our DevOps team to utilize it effectively for daily deployments and configurations."
"The product is familiar to use, which is a positive aspect."
"I can state that I almost never see crashes or glitches in my experience."
 

Cons

"Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages could be improved because most people are using Ubuntu 24 right now, as it is the latest version on the market and has fewer vulnerabilities compared to Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages."
"There are a few applications that are not easy to deploy on Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages, so we need to have some workarounds for that."
"Despite mentioning many advantages, an area for improvement in Ubuntu is its application support, as it lacks many GUI-friendly applications that are available on Windows or macOS, which limits usability for tasks requiring specific software."
"I would not agree that Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages is 99% stable and reliable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages?
We are going with the open source version and are not purchasing Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages.
What needs improvement with Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages?
There are a few applications that are not easy to deploy on Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages, so we need to have some workarounds for that. For example, certain appli...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages?
Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages is reasonable in price, and I think the license is acceptable.
What needs improvement with Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages?
I am not certain what improvements could be made to Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages, but perhaps some built-in security features could help. Additional securi...
What is your primary use case for Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages?
I work for a company that supports a ServiceNow platform integrated with other platforms, so I cannot specify whether I am a user, partner, integrator, or consultant for Microsoft. Our client use c...
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages vs. Windows Server 2016 (Windows Server 2016) | Support by SupportedImages and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.