No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages vs Visual Studio Professional 2022 comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 ...
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
512th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Visual Studio Professional ...
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
436th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2920476 - PeerSpot reviewer
Development Engineer at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Containerization with automation has improved deployment speed and supports efficient DevOps work
One area for improvement would be longer security support and more frequent updates. Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages is stable, but as technology evolves, compatibility with newer versions of Docker, Kubernetes, and other DevOps tools can become a challenge. I would also want to see more lightweight and optimized official Docker images to reduce image size, improve build times, and minimize security vulnerabilities. Better documentation and smoother dependency management could also be more helpful. I would like Canonical to focus more on security updates, vulnerability scanning, and compatibility with modern DevOps tools. For example, smaller or more optimized Docker images would help reduce build time and improve container startup performance. It would also be helpful to have regular updates for commonly used packages and better compatibility with newer Docker and Kubernetes versions. Another important area is clear documentation for upgrading older Ubuntu versions to newer LTS releases without disrupting existing applications. These improvements would make Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages more secure, efficient, and easier to maintain in production. The main areas of improvement that kept my rating at eight instead of a nine or ten would be that there are some newer technologies and dependencies that might have compatibility issues with older packages. Additionally, security maintenance and upgrading to newer LTS versions require additional effort. Overall, it is a good platform, but there is room for improvement in modern tool compatibility, security, and container optimization. A small improvement would be better built-in monitoring and diagnostic tools, making it easier to identify performance issues, memory usage, and resource bottlenecks. It would also be helpful to have similar security patch management, clear upgrade notifications, and more detailed documentation for Docker and Kubernetes compatibility. These small improvements could significantly ease day-to-day system administration and reduce troubleshooting efforts.
Nishant Thakkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Analyst at WTW
Building AI-assisted disposable research tools has transformed how I automate data gathering
I believe IntelliSense is a good tool to work with, but I wish it could be strengthened in terms of auto suggestions and code rectification. It is efficient at this moment but has room for improvement. Firstly, there is room for improvement in IntelliSense auto suggestion and auto compilation. Although it is very good and robust, it can be improved. Secondly, I have noticed that it sometimes takes a little time to start up and can be a bit slow, perhaps because it consumes lots of RAM or CPU resources. If that can be improved, it would be beneficial. Regarding Visual Studio Professional 2022's AI capabilities, I believe it needs some improvement in accuracy and reliability. At the moment, while AI provides suggestions, I have to review and edit them. Although it has its concerns, it is good in that AI now gives a first draft, whereas in the past, humans had to write everything from scratch.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"What I like about the product is the license cost and security, as there is no license cost for Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages."
"Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages provides a reliable and flexible environment for our day-to-day activities."
"Visual Studio Professional 2022 is a fully functional IDE with advanced capabilities that provide an edge over other platforms."
"Capability in Visual Studio Professional 2022 means it is supporting all things like testing for my testing purpose, as well as the development; everything is integrated in Visual Studio Professional 2022."
"Visual Studio has pretty good support for Git conflict resolving features."
"The benefits that Visual Studio Professional 2022 provides combined with the pricing makes it a good choice."
 

Cons

"The main areas of improvement that kept my rating at eight instead of a nine or ten would be that there are some newer technologies and dependencies that might have compatibility issues with older packages."
"Using open-source, Excel-based tools is not very user-friendly."
"One area I could suggest regarding improvements in deployment efficiency using Visual Studio Professional 2022 is that the context-aware code suggestion should be more tailored."
"Currently, Visual Studio Professional 2022 is not supporting the .TS, TypeScript code, which is a disadvantage, because with Playwright, we can do that in C#, but having Playwright code with TypeScript, I am not able to see any project or any suggestion about the .TS code."
"Regarding Visual Studio Professional 2022's AI capabilities, I believe it needs some improvement in accuracy and reliability."
"Apart from the editing feature, I would like to see improvement in Visual Studio Professional 2022 because performance has dropped significantly, making it currently about 100 times slower than Qt Creator, which is unreasonable to use in a multi-core environment such as the 128 cores that I use."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages?
What I like about the product is the license cost and security, as there is no license cost for Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages.
What needs improvement with Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages?
Using open-source, Excel-based tools is not very user-friendly. The complexity comes from using full access Microsoft Excel. I believe that I have not found it very friendly to use Microsoft Excel....
What is your primary use case for Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages?
Our major use case for Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages is that our ERP is on Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Professional 2022?
I am using the free version of Visual Studio Professional 2022. I find the price of Visual Studio Professional 2022 to be affordable.
What needs improvement with Visual Studio Professional 2022?
Currently, Visual Studio Professional 2022 is not supporting the .TS, TypeScript code, which is a disadvantage, because with Playwright, we can do that in C#, but having Playwright code with TypeSc...
What is your primary use case for Visual Studio Professional 2022?
I am using Visual Studio Professional 2022 for test automation. For test automation, I use only Visual Studio and VS Code; I use VS Code for my Playwright and Visual Studio for my Selenium C#.
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Dice, Upbound, Tulip Interfaces and others in AWS Marketplace. Updated: October 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.