Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Trellix Network Detection and Response vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL] comparison

The compared Trellix and WatchGuard solutions aren't in the same category. Trellix is ranked #13 in ATP , with an average rating of 7.6, and holds a 5.1% mindshare in the category. Additionally, 97% of Trellix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.
Trellix Network Detection a...
Read 39 Trellix Network Detection and Response reviews
  • 2,070 Views
  • 973 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
WatchGuard XTM [EOL]
Read 34 WatchGuard XTM [EOL] reviews
    90% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive Summary
    We performed a comparison between Trellix Network Detection and Response and WatchGuard XTM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

    Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft, Fortinet and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP).

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Report (Updated: August 2025).
    Buyer's Guide
    Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
    August 2025
    Download the complete report
    Helped 867,497 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Trellix Network Detection a...
    Average Rating
    8.4
    Reviews Sentiment
    7.3
    Number of Reviews
    39
    Ranking in other categories
    Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (13th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (10th)
    WatchGuard XTM [EOL]
    Average Rating
    8.0
    Number of Reviews
    34
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    BiswabhanuPanda - PeerSpot reviewer
    Offers in-depth investigation capabilities, integrates well and smoothly transitioned from a lower-capacity appliance to a higher one
    The in-depth investigation capabilities are a major advantage. When the system flags something as malicious, it provides a packet capture of that activity within the environment. That helps my team quickly identify additional context that most other tools wouldn't offer – like source IP or base64 encoded data. We can also see DNS requests and other details that aren't readily available in solutions like Check Point or others that we've tried. The detection itself is solid, and their sandboxing is powerful. There's a learning curve – you need a strong grasp of OS-level changes, process forking, registry changes, and the potential impact of those. But with that knowledge, the level of information Trellix provides is far greater than what we've seen elsewhere. The real-time response capability of Trellix has been quite effective, although it's not very fast. The key is this solution's concept of 'preference zero.' They don't immediately act on a zero-day. For example, the solution has seen a piece of malware for the first time. It'll let it in, then do sandboxing. Maybe after four or five minutes, it identifies that specific file's DNX Secure Store as malicious. At that point, they update the static analysis engine, and it gets detected if anything else tries to download the same file. There is that initial 'preference zero' concept, like with Panda. You may not hold traffic in the network. That's standard in the industry; we don't do much about it. To address that, we also have endpoint solutions. We use SentinelOne in our environment, which helps us identify threats like Western Bureaus and others.
    Read full review
    Generalm4545 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Protects from attack software and hacking but it doesn't provide the reports in a readable format
    In my opinion, image clarity is very important, because I don't get the proper image product on reports. This means that functionality is not there. My engineer does not know how he can replace an order. We attach a log after any kind of keys using a utility instead. For the internet policies that we are implementing, the policy should be based on proper protocols. We use the default policies and there are a number of third-party protocols that appear here. Management with WatchGuard XTM means that out of policy is the problem from our side. In this way, we can not do effective services for people with this one. The policy definition with WatchGuard XTM is not proper for all use case requirements. I've got weekly business reports that I am expecting attachments with from WatchGuard XTM that display data for all kinds of consideration which should be required. Main User Functionality Level Order must adhere to using the admin functionality on the registry, or else our users publish their own name. Maybe these recommendations are irrelevant, but I say that the issue to improve most with WatchGuard XTM is the Main User Function.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement and that nothing else was infected. It helped us correlate the events and feel confident in our containment."
    "The most valuable feature is MVX, which tests all of the files that have been received in an email."
    "The installation phase was easy."
    "The product is very easy to configure."
    "Before FireEye, most of the times that an incident would happen nobody would be able to find out where or why the incident occurred and that the system is compromised. FireEye is a better product because if the incident already happened I know that the breach is there and that the system is compromised so we can take appropriate action to prevent anything from happening."
    "If we are receiving spam emails, or other types of malicious email coming from a particular email ID, then we are able to block them using this solution."
    "The sandbox feature of FireEye Network Security is very good. The operating system itself has many features and it supports our design."
    "The MVX Engine seems to be very capable against threats and the way it handles APTs is impressive."
    More Trellix Network Detection and Response pros
    "​Monitoring of network activity is included in the box.​"
    "Reputation Enabled Defense indicates that some websites are so infested that it's not even worth visiting them, and therefore saving the bandwidth of going through the detection process."
    "They have a reporting system which can store data over a very long period of time. Not many other firewall vendors provide a reporting system, but if they do, like Fortinet does, then you've got buy that as an additional product and that can be more than twice as expensive as the initial investment in the firewall. And without reporting over a long-term period, you're just about wasting your time."
    "It is stable and does not require you to reboot all the time.​"
    "WatchGuard XTM is fairly basic. We use it as the perimeter firewall. The main point is to protect from attack software and hacking."
    "After installing the product, we achieved awareness of our data protection needs and email misuse."
    "I like the hostwatch because I can see what traffic uses the most bandwidth and I can block that site."
    "SNMP status monitoring and the Central Management Software."
    More WatchGuard XTM [EOL] pros
     

    Cons

    "Improvements could be achieved through greater integration capabilities with different firewall solutions. Integrating with the dashboard itself for different firewalls so users can also pull tags into their firewall dashboard."
    "There is a lot of room for Improvement in the offering, from cost to functionality. It is pretty straightforward to implement which is an advantage. However, it falls short in pricing, detection capabilities, and, most importantly, reporting and policy management."
    "If you want to search the hashes in the environment, you need to put in IOCs one by one, making it a very hectic job."
    "Management of the appliance could be greatly improved."
    "We'd like the potential for better scaling."
    "The solution's support needs to improve their support."
    "Cybersecurity posture has room for improvement."
    "Its documentation can be improved. The main problem that I see with FireEye is the documentation. We are an official distributor and partner of FireEye, and we have access to complete documentation about how to configure or implement this technology, but for customers, very limited documentation is available openly. This is the area in which FireEye should evolve. All documents should be easily available for everyone."
    More Trellix Network Detection and Response cons
    "The initial setup is neither simple nor complex. If you know the base in networking and how the firewall works, you will be able to figure it out.​"
    "WatchGuard doesn't have a product that allows them to get into the data center. And that's just because there is no hardware to do the job. The software could do it, but there's no hardware that allows that to happen at the moment. So it doesn't scale as well as some other products, that's for sure."
    "Sometimes we have had issues with stability of the product."
    "One huge issue with WatchGuard XTM is that I'm not getting reports in a readable format. Readable means, I don't want Excel online. We repeat auditing when we trigger the report or setup calendar. That functionality is what we are looking for from WatchGuard XTM here."
    "I would like them to improve the product's overall protections. This would be good for all product users."
    "The setting policies need improvement. It needs an easier way to do static NAT and check on what policy is being used for that specific traffic."
    "The VPN errors are not helpful when troubleshooting."
    "Syslog (Dimension) is focused on presentation, but needs more focus on utility like SonicWall syslog (GMS/Analyzer)."
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "Because of what the FireEye product does, it has significantly decreased our mean time in being able to identify and detect malicious threats. The company that I work with is a very mature organization, and we have seen the meantime to analysis decrease by at least tenfold."
    "When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."
    "There are some additional services that I understand the vendor provides, but our approach was to package all of the features that we were looking to use into the product."
    "The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."
    "It's an expensive solution."
    "The pricing is a little high."
    "The tool is a bit pricey."
    "The pricing is fair, a little expensive, but fair. We've evaluated other products, and they're similarly priced."
    More Trellix Network Detection and Response pricing and cost advice
    "Get at least a maintenance contract for the updates and take a larger WatchGuard than you need. A WatchGuard creates new ways to secure your network."
    "The licensing and renewal is very expensive."
    "It costs less than the SO works and others (like SonicWall, Cisco, and Barracuda) without increasing so much CPU use."
    "Like all other manufacturers, there are a lot of features and different pricing. The best is to talk to a representative.​"
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Financial Services Firm
    13%
    Comms Service Provider
    12%
    Manufacturing Company
    10%
    Computer Software Company
    9%
    No data available
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business19
    Midsize Enterprise8
    Large Enterprise19
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business24
    Midsize Enterprise7
    Large Enterprise3
     

    Questions from the Community

    What do you like most about FireEye Network Security?
    We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement an...
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network Security?
    While I do not handle pricing directly, it is known that there is a variety of customers with different licensing needs, which depends on the organization's size and policy.
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?
    The Trellix solution could be improved by enhancing the Central Management Console for faster visibility, which would help in network detection response. Networking often involves complexity that c...
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
    Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
    Compared 13% of the time
    Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
    Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
    Compared 10% of the time
    Trend Micro Deep Discovery vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
    Trend Micro Deep Discovery vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
    Compared 8% of the time
    Darktrace vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
    Darktrace vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
    Compared 7% of the time
    Zabbix vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
    Zabbix vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
    Compared 6% of the time
    More Trellix Network Detection and Response Competitors
    No data available
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Trellix Network Detection and Response
    August 2025
    Trellix Network Detection and Response reportDownload Trellix Network Detection and Response product report
    Buyer's Guide
    WatchGuard XTM [EOL]
    August 2025
    WatchGuard XTM [EOL] reportDownload WatchGuard XTM [EOL] product report
     

    Also Known As

    FireEye Network Security, FireEye
    No data available
     

    Overview

    Detect the undetectable and stop evasive attacks. Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) helps your team focus on real attacks, contain intrusions with speed and intelligence, and eliminate your cybersecurity weak points.

    Trellix

    Small businesses need big security, too, and the WatchGuard XTM Series firewall/VPN appliances deliver that strong protection, but without the hefty price tag. Enterprise-grade security includes full HTTPS content inspection, VoIP support, and optional security subscriptions like Application Control and Intrusion Prevention Service.

    WatchGuard
     

    Sample Customers

    FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems
    AVG, Cyren, Kaspersky Lab, Lastline, NCP engineering, Trend Micro, Websense
    Buyer's Guide
    Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
    August 2025
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft, Fortinet and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Updated: August 2025.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.