Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Trellix Network Detection and Response vs WatchGuard XTM [EOL] comparison

The compared Trellix and WatchGuard solutions aren't in the same category. Trellix is ranked #12 in ATP , with an average rating of 7.6, and holds a 5.3% mindshare in the category. Additionally, 97% of Trellix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.
Trellix Network Detection a...
Read 39 Trellix Network Detection and Response reviews
  • 2,152 Views
  • 1,011 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
WatchGuard XTM [EOL]
Read 34 WatchGuard XTM [EOL] reviews
    90% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive Summary
    We performed a comparison between Trellix Network Detection and Response and WatchGuard XTM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

    Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft, Fortinet and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP).

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Report (Updated: July 2025).
    Buyer's Guide
    Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
    July 2025
    Download the complete report
    Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Trellix Network Detection a...
    Average Rating
    8.4
    Reviews Sentiment
    7.3
    Number of Reviews
    39
    Ranking in other categories
    Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (12th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (10th)
    WatchGuard XTM [EOL]
    Average Rating
    8.0
    Number of Reviews
    34
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    BiswabhanuPanda - PeerSpot reviewer
    Offers in-depth investigation capabilities, integrates well and smoothly transitioned from a lower-capacity appliance to a higher one
    The in-depth investigation capabilities are a major advantage. When the system flags something as malicious, it provides a packet capture of that activity within the environment. That helps my team quickly identify additional context that most other tools wouldn't offer – like source IP or base64 encoded data. We can also see DNS requests and other details that aren't readily available in solutions like Check Point or others that we've tried. The detection itself is solid, and their sandboxing is powerful. There's a learning curve – you need a strong grasp of OS-level changes, process forking, registry changes, and the potential impact of those. But with that knowledge, the level of information Trellix provides is far greater than what we've seen elsewhere. The real-time response capability of Trellix has been quite effective, although it's not very fast. The key is this solution's concept of 'preference zero.' They don't immediately act on a zero-day. For example, the solution has seen a piece of malware for the first time. It'll let it in, then do sandboxing. Maybe after four or five minutes, it identifies that specific file's DNX Secure Store as malicious. At that point, they update the static analysis engine, and it gets detected if anything else tries to download the same file. There is that initial 'preference zero' concept, like with Panda. You may not hold traffic in the network. That's standard in the industry; we don't do much about it. To address that, we also have endpoint solutions. We use SentinelOne in our environment, which helps us identify threats like Western Bureaus and others.
    Read full review
    Generalm4545 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Protects from attack software and hacking but it doesn't provide the reports in a readable format
    In my opinion, image clarity is very important, because I don't get the proper image product on reports. This means that functionality is not there. My engineer does not know how he can replace an order. We attach a log after any kind of keys using a utility instead. For the internet policies that we are implementing, the policy should be based on proper protocols. We use the default policies and there are a number of third-party protocols that appear here. Management with WatchGuard XTM means that out of policy is the problem from our side. In this way, we can not do effective services for people with this one. The policy definition with WatchGuard XTM is not proper for all use case requirements. I've got weekly business reports that I am expecting attachments with from WatchGuard XTM that display data for all kinds of consideration which should be required. Main User Functionality Level Order must adhere to using the admin functionality on the registry, or else our users publish their own name. Maybe these recommendations are irrelevant, but I say that the issue to improve most with WatchGuard XTM is the Main User Function.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "The features that I find most valuable are the MIR (Mandiant Incident Response) for checks on our inbound security."
    "I also like its logging method. Its logging is very powerful and useful for forensic purposes. You can see the traffic or a specific activity or how something entered your network and where it went."
    "The server appliance is good."
    "Very functional and good for detecting malicious traffic."
    "We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement and that nothing else was infected. It helped us correlate the events and feel confident in our containment."
    "The product has helped improve our organization by being easy to use and integrate. This saves time, trouble and money."
    "Application categorization is the most valuable feature for us. Application filtering is very interesting because other products don't give you full application filtering capabilities."
    "We see ROI in the sense that we don't have to react because it stops anything from hurting the network. We can stop it before we have a bigger mess to clean up."
    More Trellix Network Detection and Response pros
    "We have used technical support for WatchGuard many times and overall, we are satisfied with it. They are always listening and there is a good reaction time to our findings. When there are issues, they really try to resolve them."
    "Reputation Enabled Defense indicates that some websites are so infested that it's not even worth visiting them, and therefore saving the bandwidth of going through the detection process."
    "SNMP status monitoring and the Central Management Software."
    "They have a reporting system which can store data over a very long period of time. Not many other firewall vendors provide a reporting system, but if they do, like Fortinet does, then you've got buy that as an additional product and that can be more than twice as expensive as the initial investment in the firewall. And without reporting over a long-term period, you're just about wasting your time."
    "There is a site-to-site VPN configuration between others people."
    "It is stable and does not require you to reboot all the time.​"
    "Application Control is fantastic with over 2,500 applications and the granularity that we can either allow people to view but not be able to log on to Facebook; or view it and log onto it if they're in the marketing department, but not play Facebook games. There are all sorts of different options like that. So it's highly granular."
    "After installing the product, we achieved awareness of our data protection needs and email misuse."
    More WatchGuard XTM [EOL] pros
     

    Cons

    "A better depth of view, being able to see deeper into the management process, is what I'd like to see."
    "It is very expensive, the price could be better."
    "Certain features in Trellix Network Detection and Response, such as using AL-type commands, may initially pose a challenge for those unfamiliar with such commands. However, once users become accustomed to the system, it becomes easier to use."
    "If you want to search the hashes in the environment, you need to put in IOCs one by one, making it a very hectic job."
    "Its documentation can be improved. The main problem that I see with FireEye is the documentation. We are an official distributor and partner of FireEye, and we have access to complete documentation about how to configure or implement this technology, but for customers, very limited documentation is available openly. This is the area in which FireEye should evolve. All documents should be easily available for everyone."
    "FireEye Network Security should have better integration with other vendors' firewalls or proxies, such as Palo Alto and Fortinet. Files that are being submitted should happen through the API or automatically."
    "It is not a very secure product."
    "It would be a good idea if we could get an option to block based upon the content of an email, or the content of a file attachment."
    More Trellix Network Detection and Response cons
    "The initial setup is neither simple nor complex. If you know the base in networking and how the firewall works, you will be able to figure it out.​"
    "One huge issue with WatchGuard XTM is that I'm not getting reports in a readable format. Readable means, I don't want Excel online. We repeat auditing when we trigger the report or setup calendar. That functionality is what we are looking for from WatchGuard XTM here."
    "Syslog (Dimension) is focused on presentation, but needs more focus on utility like SonicWall syslog (GMS/Analyzer)."
    "Sometimes we have had issues with stability of the product."
    "WatchGuard doesn't have a product that allows them to get into the data center. And that's just because there is no hardware to do the job. The software could do it, but there's no hardware that allows that to happen at the moment. So it doesn't scale as well as some other products, that's for sure."
    "The setting policies need improvement. It needs an easier way to do static NAT and check on what policy is being used for that specific traffic."
    "I would like them to improve the product's overall protections. This would be good for all product users."
    "The VPN errors are not helpful when troubleshooting."
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."
    "When you purchase FireEye Network Security NX, will need to purchase a megabit per second package. You must know your needs from day one."
    "It's an expensive solution."
    "The pricing is a little high."
    "Pricing and licensing are reasonable compared to competitors."
    "Because of what the FireEye product does, it has significantly decreased our mean time in being able to identify and detect malicious threats. The company that I work with is a very mature organization, and we have seen the meantime to analysis decrease by at least tenfold."
    "Its price is a bit high. A small customer cannot buy it. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."
    "We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing."
    More Trellix Network Detection and Response pricing and cost advice
    "Get at least a maintenance contract for the updates and take a larger WatchGuard than you need. A WatchGuard creates new ways to secure your network."
    "It costs less than the SO works and others (like SonicWall, Cisco, and Barracuda) without increasing so much CPU use."
    "Like all other manufacturers, there are a lot of features and different pricing. The best is to talk to a representative.​"
    "The licensing and renewal is very expensive."
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Financial Services Firm
    13%
    Comms Service Provider
    12%
    Computer Software Company
    10%
    Government
    10%
    No data available
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
     

    Questions from the Community

    What do you like most about FireEye Network Security?
    We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement an...
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network Security?
    While I do not handle pricing directly, it is known that there is a variety of customers with different licensing needs, which depends on the organization's size and policy.
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?
    The Trellix solution could be improved by enhancing the Central Management Console for faster visibility, which would help in network detection response. Networking often involves complexity that c...
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
    Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
    Compared 14% of the time
    Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
    Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
    Compared 11% of the time
    Trend Micro Deep Discovery vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
    Trend Micro Deep Discovery vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
    Compared 8% of the time
    Darktrace vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
    Darktrace vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
    Compared 7% of the time
    Vectra AI vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
    Vectra AI vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
    Compared 6% of the time
    More Trellix Network Detection and Response Competitors
    No data available
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Trellix Network Detection and Response
    June 2025
    Trellix Network Detection and Response reportDownload Trellix Network Detection and Response product report
    Buyer's Guide
    WatchGuard XTM [EOL]
    June 2025
    WatchGuard XTM [EOL] reportDownload WatchGuard XTM [EOL] product report
     

    Also Known As

    FireEye Network Security, FireEye
    No data available
     

    Overview

    Detect the undetectable and stop evasive attacks. Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) helps your team focus on real attacks, contain intrusions with speed and intelligence, and eliminate your cybersecurity weak points.

    Trellix

    Small businesses need big security, too, and the WatchGuard XTM Series firewall/VPN appliances deliver that strong protection, but without the hefty price tag. Enterprise-grade security includes full HTTPS content inspection, VoIP support, and optional security subscriptions like Application Control and Intrusion Prevention Service.

    WatchGuard
     

    Sample Customers

    FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems
    AVG, Cyren, Kaspersky Lab, Lastline, NCP engineering, Trend Micro, Websense
    Buyer's Guide
    Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
    July 2025
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft, Fortinet and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Updated: July 2025.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.