Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Virsec Security Platform comparison

"Blocking browser navigation is a feature of the solution with which we have experienced success."

"This is a stable product."

"The product and the services we have are quite good."

"The product provides a one-click recovery of encrypted files."

"The investigation and rule detection feature of the solution has proven most useful for our company"

"The most valuable features of the solution are the ability to isolate or quarantine devices and block or detect Ransomware and other well-known tools that are used to exploit vulnerabilities on devices."

"What we're using the most and what we found valuable in McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response are Web Control, Advanced Threat Protection, and Threat Prevention features."

"When Trellix detects some threats, the device is isolated in a quarantine zone for examination."

"We use the solution for Zero-day protection."

"Trellix needs to focus on gaining traction with partners and building trust among users."

"The alert feature of McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response needs improvement because for you to get the alerts, you have to log on to the portal. What my company needs is a tool that sends you alerts. For example, if it detects a threat on your machine, it should send you an alert. My company gets the alerts instead from the antivirus software rather than the EDR. If you want to see the alerts on McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response, you have to connect to the system manually. Another area for improvement in the tool is the reporting. My company needs weekly and monthly reports about the alerts, but you can't extract reports from McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response, so a decision was made to move to another EDR solution, particularly Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, next month. My company tested Microsoft Defender for Endpoint via a POC for one to three months. The resource usage of McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is also an area for improvement because it consumes a lot of memory. For example, during the on-demand scan, you can't work because of the high CPU usage. You need to schedule the scans. McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response has a lot of modules, but my company doesn't use all modules."

"The graphical view for nodes must be increased."

"The console has a lot of bugs, and it creates many issues."

"The solution lacks the ability to integrate with external platforms. In future releases of the solution, I would like to see the solution increase its integration capabilities with external platforms."

"I remember doing many tickets for Trellix support, and my EDR was not properly functioning. I didn't feel the detection or the real protection."

"The main drawbacks are resources and processing time, as it consumes a lot of CPU and RAM."

"The dashboard is split across different platforms. For example, if you want information on Incident Detection, you have to access one dashboard, and for DLP reporting, there's a separate platform. This fragmentation means you can't access everything from a single dashboard."

"The tool's dashboard needs to load since it is not responsive and takes time to load."

"Speaking about the price, you must use the product to find the product's cost for you."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is high, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The licensing costs attached to the solution are very easy to manage. There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs."

"The cost is okay, compared to other products."

"McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is reasonable in terms of cost. It's a tool my company has been using for a few years now. It costs $25,000 to $30,000 for six hundred users."

"The price is reasonable."

"Pricing is a problem in South Africa. It could be cheaper here. The rand-to-dollar exchange rate makes it expensive for us. A 25 dollar endpoint cost becomes quite significant when converted to rand."

"The pricing is always high."

"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."