IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why
  • Home
  • Sugar Enterprise vs. Zendesk Sell

Sugar Enterprise vs Zendesk Sell comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SugarCRM Logo

Sugar Enterprise

Read 5 Sugar Enterprise reviews
159 views|102 comparisons
Zendesk Logo

Zendesk Sell

268 views|129 comparisons
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

    • More Sugar Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CRM solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    610,518 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Sugar Enterprise?
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of Sugar Enterprise are the exports of graphics, statuses, complaints, and tasks.
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sugar Enterprise?
    Top Answer:I don't know the exact pricing, however, I know that there is a standard fee for the setup and then you pay on a monthly basis per user.
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Sugar Enterprise?
    Top Answer:Sugar Enterprise could improve by removing bugs and glitches. For example, a comment was made but in the comment section, it was never displayed. However, the problems we faced might not be the fault… more »
    Read all 5 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    13th
    out of 69 in CRM
    Views
    159
    Comparisons
    102
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    317
    Rating
    7.8
    27th
    out of 69 in CRM
    Views
    268
    Comparisons
    129
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Base CRM
    Learn More
    SugarCRM
    Zendesk
    Overview
    Sugar is an affordable and easy to use CRM platform, designed to help your business communicate with prospects, share sales information, close deals & keep customers happy. Thousands of successful companies use Sugar everyday to manage sales, marketing and support. As an open-source, web-based CRM solution, Sugar is easy to customize & adapt to your changing needs. Ideal for small & medium-sized companies, large enterprises and government organizations, Sugar can run in the cloud or on-site.

    Zendesk Sell is simple and designed to keep reps selling. Sell removes the friction from deal updates so your team can always access, analyze, and collaborate on relevant deal data.

    Offer
    Learn more about Sugar Enterprise
    Learn More
    Learn more about Zendesk Sell
    Learn More
    Sample Customers
    Redglaze Group, TengoInternet, Hilco, Bancvue, Vet Adivsor
    Mailchimp, Tesco, Vimeo, Instacart, Mediaocean, Slack, Uber
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business67%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise17%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    CRM
    June 2022
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Salesforce, Microsoft, SAP and others in CRM. Updated: June 2022.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    610,518 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Sugar Enterprise is ranked 13th in CRM with 5 reviews while Zendesk Sell is ranked 27th in CRM. Sugar Enterprise is rated 7.8, while Zendesk Sell is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Sugar Enterprise writes "Customizable, easy to configure, and reliable". On the other hand, Sugar Enterprise is most compared with , whereas Zendesk Sell is most compared with Freshsales, Oracle Service Cloud and Pipedrive.

    See our list of best CRM vendors.

    We monitor all CRM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.