SpecFlow vs TestRail comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Tricentis Logo
466 views|195 comparisons
IDERA Logo
3,701 views|1,690 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SpecFlow and TestRail based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Test Management Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed SpecFlow vs. TestRail Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The initial setup is easy.""The most valuable feature of the solution is unit testing...It is also an easy-to-use and user-friendly product that can easily adapt to any framework.""SpecFlow's best feature is the ability to add additional layers to the programming.""One of the most valuable features of SpecFlow for us is its risk identification capabilities."

More SpecFlow Pros →

"Integration with Confluence and JIRA.""The most valuable features are the reporting in the dashboard and the general way in which we can create test runs is helpful.""From a testing perspective, the management is awesome. I am able to do testing and then add the reporting and the evidence. It is fair in terms of the price that you're paying. You get what you're paying for.""I use the product to create test cases and share them with my team and manager.""Reliable and stable. It is important that TestRail be up and running 24/7 as we have users around the world using it.""The most valuable features are the flexibility, ease of use for writing new test cases, the test plans, and the composition.""The product helps us create test cases and reports.""The solution is very stable. We've never had any issues with it."

More TestRail Pros →

Cons
"SpecFlow's installation and configuration can be a bit challenging due to its flexibility as an open-source tool.""Regarding improvement, it would be good if SpecFlow could provide chain testing, which it currently doesn't allow.""I'd prefer in TFS if we could be writing test cases, not in the old classical version. We should be writing in Gherkin and then automatically have it convert that Gherkin test case into SpecFlow feature files.""SpecFlow would be improved with the addition of functionality reporting, which would be really helpful for automation testing."

More SpecFlow Cons →

"This solution has room for improvement. For example, some particular projects need to adjust access or add additional members and this isn't always possible. Role-based access would improve this.""I do see room for lots of improvement in it. In terms of usability, duplication with test cases and constant creation of projects isn't easy. There is also too much API integration into automation tools, which is not there in ALM with UFT. Instead of setting it up as a project and using it, we set it up as a system for usability. It also lacks in the traceability aspect. For traceability, you need to use the JIRA plugin and drag traceability on JIRA, but the functionality is still quite limited. The biggest gap is mainframe testing. It would be good if I could start with mainframe testing. Manual granting of access is another issue. There is no API that I could use with another system where it is automated. There is an API for loading somebody to a project but not for adding to the application.""The TestRail API to integrate reporting of automated tests is complete, but requires many requests to identify the appropriate entry.""The test suite management has room for improvement as well as better reporting.""With TestRail, the APIs are there, but they may not be able to easily integrate with the Jenkins.""TestRail should improve its pricing.""It's not easy to create a custom report. It's not straightforward. A good improvement would be if there was a way to report and create a custom report without using a plugin or scripting language.""TestRail by Gurock could improve by adding a defect management module tool. It would add a lot of value if I want to install it and I don't have Jira or an isolating team. For example, if I am providing a service it's separated from the development team, it then would be better to have defect management included with the test management. However, as it is now I need to be integrated with Jira or another defect management tool to complete the testing process."

More TestRail Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "SpecFlow is open-source and free of charge."
  • "SpecFlow is an open-source product."
  • More SpecFlow Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Use TestRail Cloud (online TR hosted server) and don't worry about maintenance or scalability. It saves a lot of cash and time."
  • "My advice to others is to shop around for the best deal. Some options out there are free in cyberspace."
  • "Pricing for small teams seems correct with respect to competitors."
  • "Negotiate the best deal you can."
  • "Its price is definitely not more. If they introduce automation, they can charge more."
  • "The price of the solution is based on how many users you have per year. When you grow, it is segmented, For example, 10 to 25, you have a price, and more than 50, or 100, you need to take the enterprise license. I don't think we will reach this point."
  • "I give the price a five out of ten."
  • "The product is not much expensive."
  • More TestRail Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:One of the most valuable features of SpecFlow for us is its risk identification capabilities.
    Top Answer:SpecFlow is an open-source product. You just use SpecFlow's plugin capabilities or add it to your existing framework.
    Top Answer:In terms of improvement, SpecFlow's installation and configuration can be a bit challenging due to its flexibility as an open-source tool. While it offers a balanced flexibility, setting it up might… more »
    Top Answer:I use the solution for test management.
    Top Answer:The product has a reasonable price in terms of the features.
    Ranking
    9th
    Views
    466
    Comparisons
    195
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    609
    Rating
    7.3
    3rd
    Views
    3,701
    Comparisons
    1,690
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    309
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Zephyr Enterprise logo
    Compared 18% of the time.
    TFS logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    Tricentis qTest logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Sealights logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Jira logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    Also Known As
    SpecFlow+
    TestRail by Gurock
    Learn More
    Overview

    SpecFlow is a testing framework that supports Behaviour Driven Development (BDD). It lets us define application behavior in plain meaningful English text using a simple grammar defined by a language called Gherkin.

    TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

    Easily track and follow the status of individual tests, milestones and projects with dashboards and activity reports. Get real-time insights into your testing progress and boost productivity with personalized todo lists, filters and email notifications. Efficient test management, get started today!

    Sample Customers
    Microsoft, Caterpillar, Siemens, Charles Schwab, IBM, Deloitte, Accenture, Philips, Dell, Deutsche Bank
    Apple, Microsoft, Boeing, Intel, NASA, Amazon, HP, Samsung
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Healthcare Company12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company50%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm13%
    University13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise64%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business61%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise22%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise56%
    Buyer's Guide
    SpecFlow vs. TestRail
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about SpecFlow vs. TestRail and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    SpecFlow is ranked 9th in Test Management Tools with 4 reviews while TestRail is ranked 3rd in Test Management Tools with 21 reviews. SpecFlow is rated 7.2, while TestRail is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of SpecFlow writes "Ensures efficient testing and validation of both business and technical requirements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestRail writes "A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities". SpecFlow is most compared with Tricentis Tosca and Tricentis qTest, whereas TestRail is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, TFS, Tricentis qTest, Sealights and Jira. See our SpecFlow vs. TestRail report.

    See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.