We performed a comparison between Skyhigh Security and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Skyhigh Security provides strong URL spam filtering, automatic reports, and encrypted disk and endpoint protection. On the other hand, Trend Micro Cloud One offers excellent vulnerability protection, login inspection, and control over restrictions for server access and application installation. Skyhigh Security needs to enhance its virtual solution strength, local application integration, encrypted disk implementation, unsanctioned app support, API integration, UI, and technical support. On the other hand, Trend Micro Cloud One needs improvements in pricing, automation, robustness, alerts, and flexibility.
Service and Support: Skyhigh Security received mixed reviews with some users reporting unhelpful engineers and slow response times while Trend Micro Cloud One received generally positive reviews. Customers praised the knowledge, expertise, and responsiveness of the support team.
Ease of Deployment: Skyhigh Security's setup time differs depending on the user, with some finding it simple and others needing assistance, and it can take up to two weeks. On the other hand, Trend Micro Cloud One's setup time is influenced by technical expertise and can take up to a month, necessitating assistance from Trend Micro staff.
Pricing: Skyhigh Security has a higher setup cost than Trend Micro Cloud One, with expensive hardware. However, their licensing is reasonable and paid annually. Meanwhile, Trend Micro Cloud One's pricing is in the middle range and offers more flexibility with payment options. Additional services for Container Security may add up, but overall, the price is deemed good and has even decreased in recent years.
ROI: Skyhigh Security improves security, reduces data breach risk, increases visibility and control over cloud usage, and streamlines compliance. Meanwhile, Trend Micro Cloud One is flexible and easy to integrate, but the ROI is subjective.
Comparison Results: Trend Micro Cloud One is the preferred choice over Skyhigh Security according to user reviews. Excellent vulnerability protection, positive experiences with technical support, and reasonable pricing are all factors that contribute to this preference.
"The automation roles are essential because we ultimately want to do less work and automate more. The dashboards are easy to read and visually pleasing. You can understand things quickly, which makes it easy for our other teams. The network and infrastructure teams don't know as much about security as we do, so it helps to have a tool that's accessible and nice to look at."
"I like Wiz's reporting, and it's easy to do queries. For example, it's pretty simple to find out how many servers we have and the applications installed on each. I like Wiz's security graph because you can use it to see the whole organization even if you have multiple accounts."
"With Wiz, we get timely alerts for leaked data or any vulnerabilities already existing in our environment."
"Our most important features are those around entitlement, external exposure, vulnerabilities, and container security."
"The vulnerability management modules and the discovery and inventory are the most valuable features. Before using Wiz, it was a very manual process for both. After implementing it, we're able to get all of the analytics into a single platform that gives us visibility across all the systems in our cloud. We're able to correspond and understand what the vulnerability landscape looks like a lot faster."
"The solution is very user-friendly."
"The product supports out-of-the-box reporting with context about the asset and allows us to perform complex custom queries on UI."
"The CSPM module has been the most effective. It was easy to deploy and covered all our accounts through APIs, requiring no agents. Wiz provides instant visibility into high-level risks that we need to address."
"DLP policies and anomalies."
"The management is very good."
"It is easy to configure rules."
"Shadow IT reporting capabilities."
"The feature I found most valuable is the API."
"The most valuable features of MVISION Cloud are the automatic reports and modification incidents."
"User analytics."
"There is [a feature] called cloud registry where we can see a risk assessment for the cloud services being used. If we want to add a new cloud service or a new cloud application, we can check into it and do an assessment through the cloud registry."
"The stability is quite good."
"I really like Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's dashboard."
"The most valuable part of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is its dashboard, as it's simple. It's easy to manage, and you can better control the solution."
"The perfect package for all security platforms, providing more than any other endpoint solution."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security does not utilize a lot of resources which allows our users to keep working even during a scan."
"The storage and computing features are valuable."
"Virtual patching is one of the key features, which is executed with their IPS."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's best features are security analysis, remote access security, and driver security."
"Wiz's reporting capabilities could be refined a bit. They are making headway on that, but more executive-style dashboards would be nice. They just implemented a community aspect where you can share documents and feedback. This was something users had been requesting for a while. They are listening to customer feedback and making changes."
"We wish there were a way, beyond providing visibility and automated remediation, to wait on a given remediation, due to a critical aspect, such as the cost associated with a particular upgrade... We would like to see preventive controls that can be applied through Wiz to protect against vulnerabilities that we're not going to be able to remediate immediately."
"The remediation workflow within the Wiz could be improved."
"The only small pain point has been around some of the logging integrations. Some of the complexities of the script integrations aren't supported with some of the more automated infrastructure components. So, it's not as universal. For example, they have great support for cloud formation and other services, but if you're using another type of management utility or governance language for your infrastructure-as-code automation components, it becomes a little bit trickier to navigate that."
"Given the level of visibility into all the cloud environments Wiz provides, it would be nice if they could integrate some kind of mechanism to better manage tenants on multiple platforms. For example, let's say that some servers don't have an application they need, such as an antivirus. Wiz could include an API or something to push those applications out to the servers. It would be great if you could remedy these issues directly from the Wiz platform."
"One significant issue is that the searches are case-sensitive, so finding a misconfigured resource can become very challenging."
"The only thing that needs to be improved is the number of scans per day."
"We would like to see improvements to executive-level reporting and data reporting in general, which we understand is being rolled out to the platform."
"McAfee needs to add more products that could be managed from the cloud."
"The secure gateway could be improved."
"You can integrate Skyhigh's rules with Active Directory groups. For example, you can allow access to a specific website for a defined set of users. I can do that, but the rules are not straightforward. It can look up the group in Active Directory. However, it doesn't always find the proper group name. The rule configuration should be simpler and more granular. The admin should be able to map 80 groups in the rules quickly."
"The Skyhigh for Google Drive interface and policy engine is a bit confusing and limited when compared against other Google Drive CASB capabilities."
"The pricing of the solution could be adjusted to make it more reasonable."
"Skyhigh Security, as a product, is excellent, but in terms of the right services and support, those are lagging very much, for example, in Trellix. From one hundred, its score has gone down to ten, so ten out of one hundred, otherwise, it's the number one product."
"The cloud needs improvement with respect to DLP."
"SkyHigh has the ability to place users or groups on a ‘Watchlist’; which allows you to see certain views with these Watchlists users/groups in them. This is great when you are looking at live data but if I wanted to generate a report on "only" the watchlists."
"The local agent should be able to show more logs. At present, the logs are only available from the web console and not from the local agent."
"The initial setup is easy for someone who operates container platforms on a daily basis. However, it could be difficult for those coming purely from informational security or another field of an IT."
"The firewall configuration should have been automated based on the understanding of the application, utilities, and protocols."
"The product could use a little bit of automation."
"The dashboard should be a bit more intuitive."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security could improve connections with different types of authentication and user groups concerning cloud services."
"Securing S3 using Trend Vision One - Cloud Security can cost too much. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has a tool that requires lots of privileges. From my understanding, it's only for static application testing, so they need to add dynamic application testing, and there should be more collaboration with the application testing tools on the market. We have not used this product, and I don't know if they plan to decommission it or something. They should focus on application security because this tool's unique feature is multi-cloud support. However, they should improve integration with tools for these kinds of use cases, especially application security and dynamic scanning. For example, I would like it to support Dell SecureOps. I'd also like to see some enhancements to API gateway security."
"The workbook insights generate a massive list, making it inconvenient to review."
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Skyhigh Security is ranked 14th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 51 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 5th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 17 reviews. Skyhigh Security is rated 8.4, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Skyhigh Security writes "Good scalability, but the technical support service needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". Skyhigh Security is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Netskope , Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Symantec Proxy and Zscaler CASB, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and AWS Security Hub. See our Skyhigh Security vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors and best Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
