We performed a comparison between Secureworks Red Cloak Threat Detection and Response [EOL] and Splunk SOAR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response."The features that I have found most valuable are that the search capabilities are easy to use. The dashboards are good. The reports are good. It is just simple from a deployment standpoint - that was easy."
More Secureworks Red Cloak Threat Detection and Response [EOL] Pros →
"Scalability is the best feature of the solution."
"The playbooks are valuable. They are the core component. Being able to implement and build a code process to work through and scale out what we want to do is valuable."
"The customization continues to be excellent."
"The solution allows us to customize playbooks and incorporate custom code, allowing us to drag and drop elements while still writing code to build the integrations we need."
"The most valuable feature of Splunk SOAR is the automated playbooks, which saves analysts time."
"It has definitely saved a decent amount of time for our analysts so they can focus on other tasks."
"The most valuable features of Splunk SOAR are the easy integration with other solutions, including other Splunk solutions. The most important playbooks we need on the market come already on the Frontend. However, nowadays, Splunk changed its name, it's not Frontend anymore, it's Splunk Store. This is a very strong point."
"So far, the interface is very easy to use."
"There are some automated network response portions that we want to turn up."
More Secureworks Red Cloak Threat Detection and Response [EOL] Cons →
"The scalability could be better."
"We've had trouble implementing the solution with Microsoft products. There seems to be an integration gap."
"The pricing could be a bit more reasonable. It would be great if it were feasible for smaller organizations."
"Splunk SOAR can improve IoT/OT security-related case studies or your use cases. Their integration with identity and access management (IAM) solutions is a bit shaky. They don't have good integration with a lot of IAM solutions. They do have good capability in terms of user access management internally, but even with privileged user access, they have a good module. However, if they have to integrate with solutions, such as CyberArk or IBM IAM solutions they are lacking, the visibility of user access is not that much."
"In my opinion, the focus should be on improving its simplicity, specifically the interface, and configuration."
"I haven't used it fully, but based on my usage, I could not find simulation tools and features. It currently lacks simulation features, which are important for me for creating a playbook. It is also very expensive for my region."
"The UI can be more customizable for the clients."
"Some of the training materials are on a basic level."
Earn 20 points
Secureworks Red Cloak Threat Detection and Response [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Security Incident Response while Splunk SOAR is ranked 3rd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 30 reviews. Secureworks Red Cloak Threat Detection and Response [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Splunk SOAR is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Secureworks Red Cloak Threat Detection and Response [EOL] writes "Simple deployment with good reports and dashboard". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk SOAR writes "Takes most of the work away, but the time they take to implement new features is a little bit of concern". Secureworks Red Cloak Threat Detection and Response [EOL] is most compared with VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, Cisco SecureX and VMware Carbon Black Cloud, whereas Splunk SOAR is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Cortex XSIAM, ServiceNow Security Operations, Torq and Swimlane.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.