SAP Signavio Process Manager vs TIBCO iProcess Suite comparison

"It is possible to do the whole drafting process at the same time in Sagnavio so you don't have a double effort of writing it once, arranging it and entering it again."

"This functionality ("invite anyone for feedback") has substantially increased visibility over work-in-progress when it comes to process modelling and overall process management and it decreased the time spent on giving and receiving feedback through emails and through sharing screenshots/.ppt files/Visio files etc."

"When comparing my experience with Celonis and Signavio, I can discern the distinctions between these two platforms. However, I'm unable to differentiate between ARAs and add-ons, as that falls outside my scope of familiarity. Regarding Celonis, it comes with its set of advantages and disadvantages. Notably, it boasts robust features like action flows, task mining, and seamless integration with AML programming. Conversely, Signavio lacks action flows and instead relies on action segments and tasks for interaction. This discrepancy is a significant factor setting Selenium and SecureView apart. In the context of Signavio, it offers a combination of BPMN and process discovery, a feature absent in Celonis. This tandem of BPMN and process insight contributes to Signavio’S potency. Meanwhile, Celonis primarily features the process miner tool, setting it apart from Signavio. These variations collectively outline the numerous differences existing between Celonis and Signavio."

"I rate this solution a ten out of ten."

"The most valuable feature of SAP Signavio Process Manager is the ability to do business process models."

"It is a scalable solution."

"It's way of handling is really an advantage. It's quite easy to use, without too much training . That's the main point for me."

"I like the collaboration and the real-time aspects of it."

"It's very simple to use and the integration features between Java and other services within the workflow are very easy."

"Being able to integrate the Workflow Accelerator with more products would be good."

"There are some small graphical bugs, but they are addressed immediately by Signavio to their product development team."

"The licensing model could be better."

"For me, given I've got a lot of experience working with BPMN and other process management tools, in terms of the interface, I think there's a little bit more that can be improved to match what the conventional BPMN offers. I've been constantly trying to give this feedback to Signavio, to let them know that it needs to be more coherent with the original BPMN version of the stencil."

"There is always room for improvement is the capability of integration with other solutions."

"From what I have experienced when I worked with a process team, we would like to work with dummy process diagrams. Right now, I don't know if I would set up a process as a dummy, since it very often gets mixed up with diagrams in production. There are many process diagrams linked to the production environment. I would like to have some kind of sandbox to work with. That would be very good. I don't even know if they already have it, but I would certainly like that."

"Customized reporting can be improved to make this a more versatile tool."

"There is room for improvement in analytics. People don't realize it, but the world has changed in the last six to eight months. Customers want to see AI like ChatGPT and ML capabilities in all aspects of business processes and reporting."

"Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing."

"Although Signavio is a feature-rich solution, it is expensive for companies who haven’t reached a certain maturity level in their process management initiatives."

"The solution is quite expensive compared to other vendors."

"SAP Signavio charges a lot of money."

"I rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"This solution provides really great value for the money."

"SAP is always more expensive. The per-user cost is hard to calculate and forecast for a big company."

"The solution is expensive."

"The price could definitely be lower."