No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 8 with support by ProComputers vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 (redhat 9) | Support by SupportedImages comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 ...
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
457th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (R...
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
330th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Md Al-Amin - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior System Analyst at Thakral
Bank projects have gained strong security and reliable performance for critical applications
From my experience as a partner, the biggest advantage of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 (redhat 9) | Support by SupportedImages is that it is a stable and reliable product. It is a reliable OS when I am using it for applications because we run middleware software upon the OS, which means if there are problems or security holes in the OS, my applications also face those issues. In that scenario, the stability and security of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 (redhat 9) | Support by SupportedImages is commendable. The security policy of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 (redhat 9) | Support by SupportedImages is improved, but security measures must still be implemented. After we install the operating system, the customer's bank security team will harden the OS to block any potential breaches or malicious activities. To measure performance with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 (redhat 9) | Support by SupportedImages, I assess how much RAM and CPU the background processes are consuming. I can restrict these processes to ensure that minimal background processes run, allowing my application server software and applications to operate better with the available memory and CPU resources.
reviewer2921154 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Daily operations have become smoother and troubleshooting is more efficient for critical servers
My experience with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 8 with support by ProComputers has been positive, but there are a few areas where it could be improved. More proactive technical support, faster response time for critical issues, and better documentation for troubleshooting common problems would be helpful. It would also be useful to have more guidance on security updates, patch management, and system optimization. A centralized dashboard for monitoring server health and identifying potential issues could further improve the experience. One additional improvement for Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 8 with support by ProComputers would be better integration with centralized monitoring and automation tools. A more user-friendly graphical interface for monitoring system health, resource utilization, and system security alerts would also be helpful, especially for teams managing multiple servers. Improved integration with ITSM platforms like ServiceNow and better automation for routine patching and maintenance tasks could save time and reduce manual effort.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Cloud integration is quite easy, and containerization support along with file system level enhancements has improved considerably."
"It is pricey, but our product requires a high level of security and performance, making it much better than Ubuntu and other Linux options."
"From my experience as a partner, the biggest advantage of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 (redhat 9) | Support by SupportedImages is that it is a stable and reliable product."
"Being able to individually allocate the kernels helps me get tasks done much easier and much quicker than what other systems would take."
"What I like the most about Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 8 with support by ProComputers is that it is easy to understand and to give commands easily."
"Ansible helps me automate repetitive administrative tasks across multiple servers, where I can install anything with a single click and manage packages, apply configurations, and verify compliance across a group of servers with a mix of both production and non-production environments, reducing manual effort and improving consistency."
"The best features Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 8 with support by ProComputers offers are that some services are already configured."
"Python 3 support and improved security features have helped me and my team significantly since Python was not supported on RHEL 7, which caused concerns for the application team."
"For example, when I use Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 8 with support by ProComputers in a cluster environment and sometimes have issues, the support immediately helps me remediate them, saving me time and research."
"Ansible Tower running on Red Hat 8 is a standout feature."
"I find the AI assistant script GitHub Copilot the most valuable and helpful in my daily work for troubleshooting errors in scripting or during any task."
 

Cons

"There is room for improvement regarding response time and first-level support quality."
"Maybe for the virtual machine management, we utilize Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 (redhat 9) | Support by SupportedImages because it is so powerful. We have a lower version of Red Hat for previous virtual machine management, and since we now have a new version, virtual machine management is more complicated."
"Regarding the technical team of Red Hat, I find the support to be a mixed bag. In my region during office hours, calls go to the Asia Pacific support team, which is not up to the mark."
"Sometimes, while using Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 8 with support by ProComputers, we encounter issues where some of the systems are not accepting certain commands, leading to command errors."
"More proactive technical support, faster response time for critical issues, and better documentation for troubleshooting common problems would be helpful."
"I rated Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 8 with support by ProComputers an 8 out of 10 because it is stable, secure, and reliable for my daily Linux administration, while I see room for improvement in technical support response time, troubleshooting documentation, and integration with newer automation tools."
"Faster response times and clearer guidance from ProComputers could further improve the entire experience."
"While I do not remember specifics at the moment, I require many features in the future for improvement."
"I choose 9 out of 10 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 8 with support by ProComputers because it needs improvement with DevOps tools and CI/CD pipelines and to improve the monitoring dashboard."
"Debian and Ubuntu are slightly ahead in terms of release frequency, but Red Hat releases are very quick."
"I would add that there could be improvements regarding the user interface, security, or performance."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 (redhat 9) | Support by SupportedImages?
To improve Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9, I suggest adding better features, patch management, and enhancing SELinux even further. Breaking SELinux is very difficult, but challenges still exist. Port m...
What is your primary use case for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 (redhat 9) | Support by SupportedImages?
I am ready to shift from a project I was focused on, and I took a break recently. I stopped working with Red Hat Enterprise Linux while I was working with Ericsson Global Services Private Limited i...
What advice do you have for others considering Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 (redhat 9) | Support by SupportedImages?
I did not use Podman in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 for container management, but I am aware it exists. I was using a VMware setup with OVF kind of images instead. We have yet to fully assess Red Ha...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 8 with support by ProComputers?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 8 with support by ProComputers has been around two years.
What needs improvement with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 8 with support by ProComputers?
I rated Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 8 with support by ProComputers an 8 out of 10 because it is stable, secure, and reliable for my daily Linux administration, while I see room for improvement ...
What is your primary use case for Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 8 with support by ProComputers?
My main use case for Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 8 with support by ProComputers is mainly for managing GitHub repos and connecting to a jump post with AKS servers. In my regular work, I use Red...
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 8 with support by ProComputers vs. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 (redhat 9) | Support by SupportedImages and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.