Qualitia Automation Studio vs Telerik Test Studio comparison

Qualitia Software and Progress Software are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Qualitia Software is ranked #34, while Progress Software is ranked #26. Qualitia Software holds a 0.1% mindshare in TAt, compared to Progress Software’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Qualitia Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

Qualitia Automation Studio

Read 5 Qualitia Automation Studio reviews

205 Views
30 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

617 Views
137 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qualitia Automation Studio

Telerik Test Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Qualitia Automation Studio and Telerik Test Studio are competitive products in the automated testing tools category. Qualitia stands out for its cost-effectiveness and customer service, while Telerik offers advanced features that justify its higher price.

Features: Qualitia Automation Studio offers scriptless automation, facilitating test case implementation without extensive coding. It integrates well with enterprise applications and is known for its ease of use. Telerik Test Studio provides robust cross-browser testing, integration with CI/CD pipelines, and flexible test scheduling, highlighting its focus on comprehensive testing capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qualitia Automation Studio simplifies deployment and provides responsive customer support, making testing setup straightforward for teams. Telerik Test Studio, despite a more complex deployment model, offers strong customer support aimed at organizations with diverse requirements.

Pricing and ROI: Qualitia Automation Studio is recognized for its competitive pricing and high ROI with lower upfront costs, appealing to budget-conscious teams. Telerik Test Studio requires a higher investment but offers substantial ROI through extensive features and long-term benefits, especially for comprehensive testing needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Qualitia Automation Studio vs. Telerik Test Studio Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Qualitia Automation Studio vs. Telerik Test Studio

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qualitia Automation Studio

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

34th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (24th), Load Testing Tools (17th), Regression Testing Tools (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Qualitia Automation Studio is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 0.8%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Suvardhana Yathiraj

Head Of Solutions at Test Yantra Software Solutions

Testing automation solution that is scriptless and is competitively priced compared to other solutions

The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it. Within four weeks, my team was up and running. This was the shortest possible ramp-up that we completed in my entire career The integrations for this…

Read full review

Raghvendra Jyothi

Manager Project Management at Capgemini

Very good performance and load testing capabilities

There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test. When we use the solution instead of Microsoft Edge, more scripting is required. The reports for structure point or test management could be more compatible with other tools. For example, when I create an application I sometimes cannot generate a report.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

"The performance and load testing are very good."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

Cons

"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is on a higher end but the competition was even more expensive. With this considered, it is a competitive solution."

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Insurance Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

22%

Hospitality Company

Government

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Selenium HQ vs Qualitia Automation Studio

Compared 100% of the time

More Qualitia Automation Studio Competitors

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 36% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 18% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 15% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 12% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 7% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

May 2025

Download Qualitia Automation Studio product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

May 2025

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Overview

Qualitia gives you simple step wise approach to quickly build your test automation and handle complexities easily with its unique scriptless approach. Qualitia gives you smart alerts and analysis to adopt changes effectively, making it agile friendly.

Qualitia Software

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

Springer, PTC, ZS, Shaadi.com, JDA, Cbazaar

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Buyer's Guide

Qualitia Automation Studio vs. Telerik Test Studio

April 2025

Free Report: Qualitia Automation Studio vs. Telerik Test Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Qualitia Automation Studio vs. Telerik Test Studio and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qualitia Automation Studio vs. Telerik Test Studio report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.