Qlik Replicate vs SAS Access comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Qlik and SAS are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Qlik is ranked #25 with an average rating of 9.0, while SAS is ranked #61. Qlik holds a 1.3% mindshare in DI, compared to SAS’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Qlik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAS users who would recommend it.

Qlik Replicate

Read 18 Qlik Replicate reviews

5,390 Views
4,204 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAS Access

Read 3 SAS Access reviews

2,357 Views
1,862 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qlik Replicate

SAS Access

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

SAS Access and Qlik Replicate are both significant players in data management, specifically in data integration and transformation. While both tools have distinct strengths, Qlik Replicate seems to have an upper hand owing to its efficient real-time data replication capabilities.

Features: SAS Access offers robust data access, transformation capabilities, and comprehensive analytics for extracting data from diverse sources. Qlik Replicate provides real-time data replication, efficient data movement from databases to data lakes, and it facilitates real-time analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAS Access provides traditional deployment with strong support, ensuring seamless integration. Qlik Replicate focuses on ease and speed of setup, supported by excellent customer service, providing an edge for businesses seeking quick implementation.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Access involves a higher initial setup cost but offers substantial long-term ROI through its analytic depth. Qlik Replicate, with potentially lower upfront costs, ensures quicker ROI due to its streamlined data processes, appealing to organizations prioritizing real-time data handling.

To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Replicate vs. SAS Access Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate vs. SAS Access

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Replicate

Ranking in Data Integration

25th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAS Access

Ranking in Data Integration

61st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Replicate is 1.3%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Access is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qlik Replicate	1.3%
SAS Access	0.8%
Other	97.9%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Shraddha Waghulde

Solution Architect at Predoole Analytics

Real-time data synchronization faces challenges with monitoring and affordability

The user-friendly interface in Qlik Replicate simplifies configuration and management of replication tasks because it is based on GUI, and users don't have to write any scripts. It is entirely drag and drop functionality. Even with zero knowledge of scripting, users can effectively use Qlik Replicate. The most valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is their change data capture feature. As soon as data is entered into the source, it gets captured at target locations. This occurs in near real-time, with replication happening within seconds at the target location. Additionally, whatever operations are performed at the source, whether adding data, deleting data, or updating anything, it gets replicated at target locations. It functions as data injection from source to target, ensuring all operations performed on the source system are replicated on target systems.

Read full review

Robert Heck

Co Owner at Hecht und Heck GmbH

The solution is stable, scalable, and flexible

I rate the solution eight out of ten. The number of people required to maintain the solution is dependent on the other applications running. The solution in itself does not require a lot of maintenance. The solution is flexible and I recommend it when you have more complex applications with special requirements.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The system is basically user-driven, mostly operating as a local platform."

"It implements new real-time capabilities for data ingestion, works in hybrid mode that is a hybrid cloud, is very good, and it looks like it has very good performance, so we're quite happy."

"Low-priced reporting and analytics solution, with good scalability and stability. It has on-premises and cloud versions that are cohesive and can integrate well."

"Support has been great."

"The cost is under control with this solution, unlike other services where it's not."

"A valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is that you do not need ETL. It's easy to use—you choose two systems and it automatically replicates them. Even if there is no CDC available, if you insert it and update it, and there is nothing to find out, then you can use Qlik Replicate. It's a good product."

"A pretty good series of connectors is one of the best features of Qlik Replicate."

"It's very user-friendly when it comes to settings and configuration. It also offers very detailed logging about warnings and errors."

More Qlik Replicate pros

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ease of access to the data in those databases."

"The SAS/ACCESS ability to connect creates an elegant simplicity."

"The most valuable feature is you have native access to the external databases."

"The most valuable part of SAS/ACCESS is what it is made for: connecting to remote systems that are not part of your physical SAS environment."

Cons

"The solution's flexibility to work with APIs should also be improved since it is very weak in working with APIs."

"When you remote into it the Qlik Replicate UI a lot of times it just freezes."

"We would like to see more details in messages about errors with the system."

"The product should improve its licensing limitation."

"It's not possible to replicate the QVC files in data analytics."

"Support-wise, this solution is in need of improvement."

"This product could be improved by providing more insight regarding errors. One of our customers that uses Qlik Replicate has had an issue. We tried to debug it, but we could not trace the error message. The infrastructure site should give us more insight about errors. Qlik Replicate is not a business solution, it's an IT solution. The reporting tools and bug site should be improved."

"In various scenarios, an important consideration is when we encounter issues and Qlik Replicate suggests reloading a specific table. If we face any problems or encounter errors with that table, it becomes necessary to make a change in Qlik Replicate. Performing a full reload every time is not feasible or practical. Instead, we should identify the specific issues and address them without repeating the entire reloading process. Based on this approach, we can investigate and resolve the problem by performing targeted loads from the source itself. This change aligns with my perspective and is something I would like to implement."

More Qlik Replicate cons

"The pricing model needs to be reconsidered and adjusted."

"The primary way that this product can be improved is by adjusting their pricing model."

"The solution can provide access to the newer databases that come out sooner."

"I can't really recall any missing feature or general improvement that is needed. We don't really add too many new kinds of databases and therefore our needs are already met."

"The solution's pricing and licensing are expensive."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Unlike Azure, where you pay based on consumption, Qlik Replicate seems to charge per endpoint."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Qlik Replicate's pricing a nine out of ten."

"Pricing for this solution is very reasonable."

"Overall, Qlik is an expensive solution. You need to pay for all additional features that you would like to use."

"Qlik Replicate is not expensive, compared to GoldenGate."

"Qlik Replicate is mainly suited for large companies. However, it is too costly for small businesses. Its pricing is high."

"The pricing model is complex and is based on modular packages as well as the size of the applicable environment."

"The solution's pricing and licensing are expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

19%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Qlik Replicate?

In terms of handling diverse data sources, Qlik Replicate does exhibit certain shortcomings.Other areas of Qlik Replicate that could be improved include its ability to serve as a single point tool,...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qlik Replicate?

My usual use cases for Qlik Replicate involve my previous organization and my current organization. I can provide my current experience. As an Australian energy provider, we have a lot of operation...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Qlik Replicate?

The usefulness of the self-service interface of Qlik Replicate lies in its ability for users to independently access fresh data from the data lake or downstream SQL systems or ODS systems without n...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Oracle GoldenGate vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 6% of the time

Fivetran vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 4% of the time

SSIS vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 4% of the time

SharePlex vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 4% of the time

Qlik Compose vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 4% of the time

More Qlik Replicate Competitors

Informatica PowerCenter vs SAS Access

Compared 8% of the time

Toad Data Point vs SAS Access

Compared 8% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs SAS Access

Compared 5% of the time

Upsolver vs SAS Access

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate Cloud Service vs SAS Access

Compared 2% of the time

More SAS Access Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate

September 2026

Download Qlik Replicate product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

September 2026

Download SAS Access product report

Also Known As

Replicate, Qlik Replicate

SAS/Access

Overview

Qlik Replicate offers log-based change data capture, supporting real-time data updates without affecting source databases. It manages schema changes automatically and ensures seamless data distribution. The platform is user-friendly, enables late-stage transformation, and supports incremental replication and real-time analytics.

Qlik Replicate is known for efficiently capturing data changes with minimal impact on source databases. Its log-based change data capture capabilities ensure quick propagation of updates in real-time while automatically handling schema changes, facilitating ease in data management. The system's seamless integration across endpoints and a user-friendly interface make it an invaluable tool for incremental replication and real-time analytics. Despite some challenges like UI freezing, complex licensing, and error handling, it is instrumental in enhancing business growth and operational efficiency. Users continuously seek improvements in error insights, data compression, and expanded API integration to better serve diverse data sources and platforms.

What are the key features of Qlik Replicate?

Log-Based Change Data Capture: Captures data changes in real-time without heavy loads.
Automatic Schema Handling: Manages schema changes seamlessly.
Platform Integration: Integrates well with platforms like AWS and Snowflake.
User-Friendly Interface: Offers a simple and intuitive interface.
Real-Time Analytics: Enables immediate data insights for business growth.

What benefits should users expect from Qlik Replicate?

Improved Data Accessibility: Enhances access to data for decision-making.
Automation in Data Modeling: Automates repetitive tasks, saving time.
Efficient Change Data Capture: Reduces downtime and increases efficiency.
Streamlined Data Pipelines: Facilitates smoother data transfers.

Qlik Replicate is used across industries such as energy, banking, and semiconductors to modernize analytics environments and streamline data flows. It excels in data migration from systems like SAP HANA and Oracle to environments like AWS, significantly reducing downtime and boosting analytics capabilities. Organizations report advantages such as enhanced data accessibility and automated data modeling, which facilitates efficient change data capture and operational effectiveness.

Qlik

SAS Access connects users to data across platforms, enabling insights and analytics. It provides seamless access and integration for data processing and management, bridging the gap between extensive datasets and analytics capabilities.

SAS Access offers robust features that facilitate data access and integration, making it a preferred choice for organizations seeking to manage, manipulate, and analyze data spread across different storage systems. Users benefit from its ability to deliver comprehensive data access, enhancing efficiency and productivity. By reducing complexities in accessing distant or disparate data, SAS Access stands as a versatile tool for businesses that want to overcome data silos and drive analytics innovation.

What Are the Valuable Features of SAS Access?

Scalability: Efficient handling of large-scale data allows organizations to grow without data processing bottlenecks.
Compatibility: Offers compatibility with a wide range of data sources, including databases and third-party applications, facilitating seamless data integration.
Security: Ensures robust data security protocols to protect sensitive data and maintain compliance with industry standards.

What Benefits Should Be Considered in Reviews?

Improved Decision-Making: Access to diverse data sources bolsters decision-making with comprehensive insights.
Time Savings: Streamlined data access reduces time spent on data preparation, accelerating project timelines.
Cost Efficiency: Efficient data processing reduces infrastructure costs and optimizes resource usage.

In finance, SAS Access is used to streamline data reporting and analysis, providing essential insights for risk management. Retailers use it to merge customer data from disparate sources, enabling personalized marketing. Healthcare organizations utilize it to integrate patient data securely, improving care delivery and outcomes.

SAS

Sample Customers

American Cancer Society, Fanzz, SM Retail, Smart Modular, Tangerine Bank, Wellcare

Los Angeles County, West Midlands Police, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Canada Post, Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate vs. SAS Access

September 2026

Free Report: Qlik Replicate vs. SAS Access

Find out what your peers are saying about Qlik Replicate vs. SAS Access and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qlik Replicate vs. SAS Access report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.