We performed a comparison between Proofpoint Threat Response and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response."It has reduced our manual efforts to remove emails from each user's inbox, and in this case we do not have to ask our IT department or users to do so."
"The best part of Proofpoint Threat Response is the Auto-Pull feature. Being able to pull an email back from a user's mailbox is very useful, yet I have noticed that not a lot of organizations use this kind of feature."
"Support is very responsive."
"There's lots of very useful documentation online to help troubleshoot and learn about the product."
"VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is a highly stable solution."
"The visibility provided has been great."
"The product allows us to focus on endpoint and antivirus protection."
"Carbon Black has very good market strategies."
"The new feature that we're deploying, the new offering from Carbon Black, is MDR, which stands for manage, detect, and response. It's the most valuable feature because Carbon Black will be continuously checking the logs, and they will be advising us on how to improve some of the policies as well as review the logs. If there are any nefarious agents or things happening on the end points, they will know."
"Carbon Black Cb Defense improved our endpoint level security. It helped to identify endpoint and infrastructure loopholes."
"I found it very valuable as a whole. It is good at detecting anything and has kept us very safe. It is also very easy to use."
"The interface within Threat Response could be made simpler."
"If the reporting gets improved then it would be better, but the product is running amazing as it is."
"Has some quirks."
"Based on all the security roles and the release privilege, it could take time for an application to be whitelisted and approved for use."
"The solution has to mature on container security and a lot of cloud environment security."
"The support is poor."
"Carbon Black has limited capability to integrate with Rapid7."
"There could be more knowledge. I think they made a mistake when they took away the Check Point integration, because it provides more automation and also more threat intelligence."
"Adding an application and a device control feature would be a great help for this solution."
"The local technical support is very poor, but the support from headquarters is very nice."
"The application control can be improved. It should also have an automatic update of the agents."
Proofpoint Threat Response is ranked 5th in Security Incident Response with 3 reviews while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is ranked 1st in Security Incident Response with 61 reviews. Proofpoint Threat Response is rated 8.4, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Proofpoint Threat Response writes "Tracks and mitigates email security incidents with Auto-Pull, and has good stability and performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Carbon Black Endpoint writes "Centralization via the cloud allows us to protect and control people working from home". Proofpoint Threat Response is most compared with Cofense Triage and ServiceNow Security Operations, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Micro Deep Security, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Symantec Endpoint Security.
See our list of best Security Incident Response vendors.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
